totally random texture thread

[teeluu]

Hah, scary shit. Great work.

[Xanthi]

awesome work

[D3ads]

Lovely.. if you can call jawless zombies lovely that is

[Defrag]

Hah, that's goddamn sick. Love it.

[nooba]

[TeddyBear]

Thanks everybody

Added some normal detail and the specular map:

[jaboo224]

nooba: Thats hawt as hell dude!!!!

Teddy: You shocked me with that zombie D:

[Tarky]

Originally designed at 1024x1024, just a crappy little tile that i did..

[TeddyBear]

A bit more zombie-like now...

(in the rain)

[st0lve]

needs more hair, facial and on the top. atleast a little sign of hair.

[Meotwister]

I don't agree necessarily. A bald zombie butcher sounds about right

As facial hair goes I'm cool with what you have right there, no qualms about it from me.

[dissonance]

wow. very nice.

now, how fast is this guy going to move? are we going to be able to sit back, appreciate the texturing/modeling, and /then/ kill him?

[TeddyBear]

wow. very nice.

now, how fast is this guy going to move? are we going to be able to sit back, appreciate the texturing/modeling, and /then/ kill him?

He's a fast motherf... you don't really want to do that ^^

Thanks all

st0lve, I agree it could look scarier with a few straws of hair indicating just recent hair loss due to zombiefication, we'll see

[TeddyBear]

Final height product from my first real-world computing experiment (an entirely unique personal invention):

It differs a bit from the other one posted earlier in the way that it contains 428 frames of footage instead of 38. The result is proof I can take any real world object and turn it into 3D (with height and normal information) with one digital camera recording and one click in Photoshop. This can save a great sum of money as the studios producing the same results today do it with terribly expensive and complex equipment. A patent application is in the works

Alright, I've optimised the computation with a more accurate stack opacity calculation; I realised that the previous one wasn't constant in its height increment. This and a few other additional overall improvements.

I'm thinking about starting a testing group for method improvements, would anyone be interested in this? Only requirements are a digital camera with a rec. function and fun ideas for objects to scan.

[SnipaMasta]

Well, I have a video camera which is the same thing (probably better since it's higher resolution) - so I'd be interested.