1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

10 Best Game Engines of This Generation

  • -HP-
  • July 16, 2009 at 1:59 PM
  • -HP-
    • July 16, 2009 at 1:59 PM
    • #1

    Dunno if I agree with the first place! But I definitely agree with the rest of the list. (or maybe UE3 should be a little bit up on the list)

    http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/100/1003728p1.html

  • Zyn
    • July 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM
    • #2

    And Source is nowhere to be found, heh.

  • -HP-
    • July 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM
    • #3

    Source is 2004 dude. (prepares to get flamed)

  • Steppenwolf
    • July 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM
    • #4

    Idiotic article, written by gamers for gamers.

  • Erratic
    • July 16, 2009 at 3:11 PM
    • #5
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    Idiotic article, written by gamers for gamers.

    Bingo.

  • -HP-
    • July 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM
    • #6

    Btw, I saw the page again and I don't think It's like the top 10, counting from 10 to 1. It's just a list of the 10 best, period.

  • Minos
    • July 16, 2009 at 3:36 PM
    • #7

    Teh article says GRAW uses Unreal 3 (360 version uses YETI, and the PC version uses Diesel)

  • Seldoon182
    • July 16, 2009 at 5:41 PM
    • #8
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    Idiotic article, written by gamers for gamers.

    So true!

  • Warby
    • July 16, 2009 at 5:55 PM
    • #9

    naughty dog engine > all !

    yeah i don't think its supposed to be in any particular order either !

    also isn't geomod only the whole "structural breaking down"-bit of the middle ware ?! and the 3d engine could be anything ?!

    also what had me giggling was the IW engine aka quake 3 ^^

  • dux
    • July 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM
    • #10

    Terrible list :[

  • Buddy
    • July 16, 2009 at 6:59 PM
    • #11
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    Idiotic article, written by gamers for gamers.

    Yes, purely judging by how the game looks leaving away most of the engine-related stuff pretty much.

    ps. lol @ iw engine and wheres id tech 5 btw

  • Deathy
    • July 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM
    • #12
    Quote from Buddy

    Yes, purely judging by how the game looks leaving away most of the engine-related stuff pretty much.

    ps. lol @ iw engine and wheres id tech 5 btw

    They listed it as Rage.

  • Minos
    • July 16, 2009 at 8:11 PM
    • #13
    Quote from Deathy

    Yes, purely judging by how the game looks leaving away most of the engine-related stuff pretty much.

    ps. lol @ iw engine and wheres id tech 5 btw

    They listed it as Rage.

    Nop, that's the rockstar engine

  • Buddy
    • July 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM
    • #14

    rockstar advanced game engine = rage

  • Deathy
    • July 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM
    • #15

    oh sorry, my bad.

    I got a little confused there..

  • ⌐■_■
    • July 16, 2009 at 8:28 PM
    • #16

    i miss my inhouse engine

  • mjens
    • July 16, 2009 at 10:10 PM
    • #17

    Here's a list of "Top 5" engines. Not so bad but still it's a "players list". Players don't know about a lot of details (cost, sdk support, performence, multiplatform) to get proper score.

    http://www.badassgamerblog.com/2009/07/ ... gines.html

  • Mazy
    • July 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM
    • #18

    I love COD4, but WTF is it doing on that list?

  • Jetsetlemming
    • July 24, 2009 at 12:36 AM
    • #19
    Quote

    ":3fzwsomo]Source is 2004 dude. (prepares to get flamed)

    The "This Generation" part of the article title is pretty much BS, considering they list Deus Ex under the Unreal Engine's games.

    Also Rockstar's RAGE looks like crap! All its good features are middleware from other companies!

  • Gloglebag
    • July 24, 2009 at 9:34 PM
    • #20

    Wait whats wrong with the Q3+++ engine, it runs great on all platforms, looks great. Though I don't like radiant, nor the fact that it apparently still doesn't have mouse look.

    Sure it's still q3 at the core, but why change what still works best, I'm sure other devs reuse good code, and IW added enough of their own.

    Can anyone explain that to me btw, why did/do so many engines lack a proper(hammer like) mouselook, even the popular UE3, or is that me just being so used to hammer.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. [cs2][WIP] De_digital (A side only) Looking for Feedback

    Howw3
    November 5, 2026 at 9:22 PM
  2. Hello from Normandy: Metin, working on a tactical FPS

    Thrik
    November 2, 2026 at 10:19 PM
  3. How do I setup CS1.6 mapping on linux?

    zlatan24
    November 2, 2026 at 6:43 AM
  4. CS:S | de_honor | Map creation process by D'artagnan

    Dartagnan
    November 1, 2026 at 5:41 PM
  5. Made a map maker for my indie game.

    daud2k7
    November 1, 2026 at 4:19 PM
  6. First CS2 Maps DM and Bomb Defusal

    zlatan24
    November 1, 2026 at 3:06 PM
  7. BELEK: turning Rouen into competitive FPS maps (Godot project, feedback wanted)

    MetinSaygin
    October 31, 2026 at 1:21 PM
  8. POLYSTRIKE - Finally Announced After Years of Development!

    MetinSaygin
    October 31, 2026 at 10:57 AM
  9. Hello guys I used to go by ''Dabu'' here

    Thrik
    October 27, 2026 at 6:47 PM
  10. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    -HP-
    October 20, 2026 at 11:37 PM

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™