1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Creative Chat

Remake HL textures

  • DelaZ
  • August 31, 2004 at 8:05 PM
  • Bic-B@ll
    • September 9, 2004 at 8:10 PM
    • #261

    pfft, its easier for you to say bic, resize this for me in ps

  • Izuno
    • September 9, 2004 at 8:16 PM
    • #262

    Great work everyone. You have all us mappers out there drooling.

  • mikezilla
    • September 9, 2004 at 8:18 PM
    • #263

    well most hl2 textures are 512's. they didn't make the same trade off's that doom 3 did so they are able to use higher resolution textures when possible, they also use 512 normal maps.

  • zaphod
    • September 9, 2004 at 9:14 PM
    • #264

    hl2 goes for texture resolution, where doom 3 goes for having every texture bump mapped.

  • Izuno
    • September 9, 2004 at 9:17 PM
    • #265
    Quote from Zaphod

    hl2 goes for texture resolution, where doom 3 goes for having every texture bump mapped.

    yes that was one of the first things i noticed about D3 textures...the bump mapping. The looked cool, but i started to realize the resulution was less than HL2 (from what i've seen) or Stalker.

    Um...so what about high res textures with bump mapping or normal mapping or whatever? (reminder...i consider myself a "texture engineer" rather than "texture artist"...ahem)

  • mikezilla
    • September 9, 2004 at 9:53 PM
    • #266

    hl2 has textures with normal maps as well on most surfaces, and spec maps.

  • Tisky
    • September 9, 2004 at 9:54 PM
    • #267

    Where are all the textures guys, work work work work.. im gonna make one now.

  • kleinluka
    • September 9, 2004 at 9:55 PM
    • #268

    doom 3 also uses like 3 original textures in the whole game.

    floor, wall, ceiling.

  • Izuno
    • September 9, 2004 at 9:58 PM
    • #269
    Quote from kleinluka

    doom 3 also uses like 3 original textures in the whole game.

    floor, wall, ceiling.

    Doom 3 seemed more about the lighting and animation. i liked the skinning on some of the monsters, but mostly cause of the bumpage/normalage...didn't really notice the highressnessage.

  • Term
    • September 9, 2004 at 10:09 PM
    • #270

    Personally I don't see normal maps as such a "next big thing" like everyone usually does after playing D3. Sure, the amount of normal textured planes and the resulting display quality is stunning... but when you consider that 99% of D3's surfaces are metal or polished plastic, one starts to wonder what other games should actually do with all that glossyness (is that a word?). For HL2, take a plain sandy desert surface or a dirty asphalt road - these surfaces wouldn't reflect any light in the way normal maps work.

    What I want to say is: for corridor crawlers like D3, set in some futuristic tech environment, normal maps come in very handy... but a game with open organic environments like HL2 could as well do with only a couple of those on the more reflective materials (even if Mikey's right and they have normal maps for most surfaces).

  • mikezilla
    • September 9, 2004 at 10:16 PM
    • #271

    i'm right.

    they actually use them very much to their advantage.. dimly lit corrider with shimmering tiles, wet looking cobble stones... free ledge information on a flat building...

    what they dont use them on is surfaces like brick and things that are dry. That would appear plasticy. But there are probably more normal mapped surfaces than you think.

  • The Postman
    • September 9, 2004 at 10:19 PM
    • #272
    Quote from kleinluka

    doom 3 also uses like 3 original textures in the whole game.

    floor, wall, ceiling.

    :roll: x 1,000

  • Taylor
    • September 9, 2004 at 10:39 PM
    • #273

    Doom 3 doesn't have any advantages over HL2 texture-wise. They both have normal maps and spec maps as far as I know. Dooms per-pixel lighting allows the normal maps to look sexier as light passes over them, which is not directly related to the textures themselves. It doesn't have bump-mapping, which creates real bumps on a surface opposed to the illusion of bumps IIRC.

    I see the point of scaling up a wall texture 2x to get nice detail, a 256x256 texture over a 128x128 brush seems fine. However, you're being silly when 128x128 walls and 64x64 crates end up at four or eight times their previous size. If someone sits by your wall and activates a sniper scope they probably deserve a few blurred pixels.

    Edit: I realise I'm digging myself a hole here, first and foremost: I'm not trying to put down the very talented work within this thread or saying it's wasteful. I'm merely posting my opinion that making everything giant is not going to fair too well. Zaphod obviously knows more about the engine than me and if HL2 IS jam-packed full of 256x256 and 512x512 textures scaled down to 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, etc. of their original size then disregard my ramblings altogether.

  • Tisky
    • September 9, 2004 at 10:56 PM
    • #274

    Last one for tonight:

    [Blocked Image: http://mapcore.org/halflife_jpg/generic_111d.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://server5.uploadit.org/files/Tiskaite-generic_door1.jpg]

  • Skjalg
    • September 9, 2004 at 11:40 PM
    • #275

    nice... but in my rarely serious oppinion that text font/color looks abit.. ugly

  • Splitta
    • September 9, 2004 at 11:40 PM
    • #276

    this one roxx0rs Tisky!

  • OL
    • September 9, 2004 at 11:56 PM
    • #277

    font looks the same to me, its kerning is a little different i guess

  • zaphod
    • September 10, 2004 at 12:55 AM
    • #278

    The reason the hl2 screenshots look better than the hl1 screenshots is becuase there is 4x the texture resolution. This is the biggest graphical improvement over hl1. The defualt texture resolution in hammer for source is .25. There are not bump-maps on most textures in the game, I would guess only on around 25-30% of them, where it would be very noticeable.

    But what do I know, I have only been working with the engine for two and a half years.

  • InsaneSingingBlender
    • September 10, 2004 at 2:14 AM
    • #279

    haha zaphod

    Tisky: i like that texture, it looks great, but those green things at the bottom look out of place

  • Term
    • September 10, 2004 at 6:45 AM
    • #280
    Quote from Zaphod

    There are not bump-maps on most textures in the game, I would guess only on around 25-30% of them, where it would be very noticeable.

    Heh, I love it when I've got something right without even knowing what I'm talking about

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  2. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  3. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  4. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  5. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  6. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  7. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  8. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  9. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  10. Classic Maps Reborn For CS2

    SillySpaceCat
    May 31, 2026 at 10:33 PM

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™