Quote from Skjalghaha, you must've be in a seriously bad mood when you wrote this and you just wanted to bash something, because this really doesn't make any sense. EVERY SEQUAL IN THE HISTORY OF GAMES AND MOVIES LOOKS LIKE THE ONE BEFORE IT. The point of a sequal is to add new shit to the old. I'll agree to that I was expecting a 4th race, but when thinking about it, starcraft doesn't need it. It would be too hard to balance properly.
And to those of you that whine about it not looking like crysis in terms of graphics. You really can't have studied Blizzard and their games pretty well. What Blizzard always have done is to take gurrent gen (NOT NEXT), and make it looks really awesome. This means that almost all current computers can run their game, and makes their game more popular. Releases like the new shooters where bad artists have to hide behind super-duper new shaders and high res stuff to make the game look cool brings the playerbase down. (sadly, this is a little true for crysis too, even though their artists are really good).
My point is, if you bash Blizzard for not making it look next-gen-super, you are just the kind of idiot that should gtfo of the games industry because its gameplay that draws players in the end. NOT GFX!
edit; if this doesnt get you in the mood you have no taste
alright. but if it indeed is gameplay that drives the train, why even bother making a sequel? i mean, wasnt the gameplay in starcraft awesome enough? why should i pay for something that i have already..?