1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Creative Chat

More nature 56k heavy.

  • Spellbinder
  • October 18, 2006 at 5:50 AM
  • Spellbinder
    • October 18, 2006 at 5:50 AM
    • #1

    Here's some new shit, i tried out the macro which worked quite well when i found out how to use it. I know i have a lot more to learn about taking pictures and maybe also how to manage them. But im satisfied with these anyway. Also i have giving up imageshack because i can't upload bigger then 1.5 or it resize them and i think a lot is missed then. So if you want to see more then this visit http://%7boption%7d and don't mind my Profile, i dont like blog sites and such its just to have somewhere to put my pics etc.

    [Blocked Image: http://spellbinder.onesite.com/images/large/s5000368.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://spellbinder.onesite.com/images/large/s5000443.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://spellbinder.onesite.com/images/large/s5000441.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://spellbinder.onesite.com/images/large/s5000401.jpg]

  • e-freak
    • October 18, 2006 at 12:16 PM
    • #2

    why not scale down those pictures a little bit and higher contrast? would not have hurt...

  • Spellbinder
    • October 18, 2006 at 1:20 PM
    • #3

    It does.

  • TomWithTheWeather
    • October 18, 2006 at 5:58 PM
    • #4

    Besides making them easier to view, resizing them down would have improved the sharpness. As they are currently, they are somewhat out of focus. Resizing would have helped.

  • Belgarion
    • October 18, 2006 at 8:40 PM
    • #5

    you should avoid using flash in nature photos at all costs. get a tripod if you need. it's definitely worth it if you want to take your photos further. you should also learn about exposure and depth of field. those two things can take your photos those extra few feet towards awesome photos instead of "automatic mode point, shoot, flash" photos.

    I think they'd be good if you'd put more effort into them, but right now they're only average. the flash creates flat borring lighting, which is the most important aspect of photography. tweaked it can be good and very useful, but in nature photos as you have, avoid. I liked the first and last best. water shots are neat, and the last one is an interesting subject.

    the last in particular i think could improve with a little bit of technique on your part. if you could narrow the F stop (higher numbers. you shot at F/2.8, which is pretty fast, and provides shallow depth of field) you would get a much deeper depth of field, making more of the photo in focus. Try again with F/5.6 or 8.

  • e-freak
    • October 18, 2006 at 9:04 PM
    • #6

    he when would have higher the blendtime which may work with tripod but as those pics are taken with a flash so we can guess he shot from the hand it would'nt come out correct

    ImageDescription -

    Make - Samsung Techwin

    Model -

    Orientation - Top left

    XResolution - 96.00

    YResolution - 96.00

    ResolutionUnit - Inch

    Software - Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows <- What for?

    DateTime - 2006:10:18 06:27:43

    YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited

    Copyright - COPYRIGHT, 2006

    ExifOffset - 352

    ExposureTime - 1/6 seconds

    FNumber - 7.10

    ExposureProgram - Manual control

    ISOSpeedRatings - 50 <- ISO 50 O.O try out 200

    ExifVersion - 0220

    DateTimeOriginal - 2006:09:22 15:52:31 <- evening or morning (sunrise/fall) rocks more

    DateTimeDigitized - 2006:09:22 15:52:31

    ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr

    CompressedBitsPerPixel - 3.71 (bits/pixel)

    ShutterSpeedValue - 1/6 seconds <- Too slow for a quick fotography and to short for a real smooth water

    ApertureValue - F 7.09

    ExposureBiasValue - 0.00

    MaxApertureValue - F 2.80

    MeteringMode - Multi-segment

    LightSource - Auto <- There is an option i think which allows shadow or something like this - could be the wb as well

    Flash - Not fired, compulsory flash mode - Good one

    FocalLength - 5.80 mm - Try out, as previous has been said, 8 or 16

    FlashPixVersion - 0100

    ColorSpace - sRGB

    ExifImageWidth - 2048

    ExifImageHeight - 1419

    InteroperabilityOffset - 900

    ExposureIndex - 1

    SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor <- Can you adjust color range manually?

    FileSource - DSC - Digital still camera <- 8|

    SceneType - A directly photographed image <- Seems like you can switch something here?

    ExposureMode - Manual

    WhiteBalance - Auto <- Try out with some fine tuning

    DigitalZoomRatio - 1.00 x <- NEVER use digital zoom (you didn't in here )

    FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 35 mm

    SceneCaptureType - Standard <- WTF?

    Saturation - Normal <- try some greyscale for contrast learning

    Sharpness - Normal <- Whatershot maybe with a softer mode?

  • Belgarion
    • October 18, 2006 at 9:14 PM
    • #7

    I hope i translated that english properly.

    The last shot would actually have been just fine at 5.6. He shot it at 2.8 with a shutter of 400. even if we bring it down two-thirds of a stop to 250, he could still have attained a 1/60 shutter at F/5.6, nevermind the two-thirds overexposure. so he could even have had a 7.1 Fstop. minus the flash which is probably a stop or two, that's easily 1/60th at F2.8, or F/7.1 with the flash.

    Of course, he's already gotten the shot, and we can't just change the exposure and take a new one. I'm just trying to help him think about it a little so next time he's more prepared.

    :edit: freak, i was talking about the last shot, 401.

  • e-freak
    • October 18, 2006 at 9:16 PM
    • #8

    oops i was talking bout water picture so i didn't really got the flash -.- ok you are right

  • Spellbinder
    • October 19, 2006 at 3:46 AM
    • #9

    Nice guys! Thats a lot of info to get me going in the right direction. I never knew what that F was (well i still don't kind of.) I dont have a tripod . Maybe i look around for prices. I shoot at freehand and thats why i'm a bit scared about the shutter. The water picture has really long shutter to get those lines and stuff. I know the flash sucks, but since i dont have a tripod i couldn't have the shutter open to long so i could get in that extra lightning. In anyway i thank you all for the information and i start to read about digital photographing more.

  • Belgarion
    • October 20, 2006 at 6:53 PM
    • #10

    depending on how far you are zoomed, you should be just fine with shutter speeds between 1/60 and 1/250. Set your ISO to 100, maybe 200, and you can get a higher shutter speed, but I wouldn't go higher with a point and shoot cam. They use CCD sensors which produce a lot of noise.

  • BlackPanther
    • October 20, 2006 at 10:50 PM
    • #11

    k the 3rd pic creeps me out... looks like a small hand is reaching out to strangle me...

  • Spellbinder
    • October 31, 2006 at 6:46 AM
    • #12

    I should have done this a long time ago. But other stuff have occupied me. But here it is. e-freak helped me resize the picture, i didn't think it would turn out nice if i did. But its quite good so i post them here. Now i will go try by myself too.

    [Blocked Image: http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/8505/nm1at6.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://img289.imageshack.us/img289/8392/nm2fo8.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/5993/nm3ca5.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://img290.imageshack.us/img290/435/nm4ct1.jpg]

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  2. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  3. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  4. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  5. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  6. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  7. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  8. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  9. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  10. Classic Maps Reborn For CS2

    SillySpaceCat
    May 31, 2026 at 10:33 PM
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™