1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

Retouch

  • DelaZ
  • February 8, 2006 at 3:03 PM
  • DelaZ
    • February 8, 2006 at 3:03 PM
    • #1

    http://demo.fb.se/e/girlpower/retouch/

    It's sad...

  • Tequila
    • February 8, 2006 at 3:06 PM
    • #2

    Sad but almost as old as media itself.

    Everything has to be taken with at least a pinch of salt.

  • Nysuatro
    • February 8, 2006 at 3:06 PM
    • #3

    They make an illusion for the world. We get this everyday, so i am not shocked

  • jayrabbit
    • February 8, 2006 at 3:56 PM
    • #4

    fake cover girls, awesome game textures - made possible by

    [Blocked Image: http://www.joseph-computer.de/mac_onlineshop/images/image_ADOBEPHOTOCS1_0.jpg]

    :roll:

  • The Postman
    • February 8, 2006 at 5:27 PM
    • #5

    Am I the only one that thought she looked better without the retouch?

  • Thrik
    • February 8, 2006 at 5:49 PM
    • #6

    No, not at all. It's been proven that a lot of men have a distinct, genuine taste for girls of below average attractiveness due to various psychological issues relating to attainability and self-perception.

  • insta
    • February 8, 2006 at 5:51 PM
    • #7
    Quote from The Postman

    Am I the only one that thought she looked better without the retouch?

    Nope.

    Edit: damn, burned by thrik

  • The Postman
    • February 8, 2006 at 6:04 PM
    • #8
    Quote from Thrik

    No, not at all. It's been proven that a lot of men have a distinct, genuine taste for girls of below average attractiveness due to various psychological issues relating to attainability and self-perception.

    Or because I hate bleach blonde bimbos because my experience with them dictates that damned near 99.9% of them have nothing interesting to say and use their good looks to cover up for the fact that they have no personality or character. Nice jab at me though, really felt that one

  • Thrik
    • February 8, 2006 at 6:22 PM
    • #9

    Some would call that prejudicial profiling. xD

  • csharp
    • February 8, 2006 at 6:31 PM
    • #10

    when adobe makes a reallifephotoshopformen, im the betatester!

  • RD
    • February 8, 2006 at 6:57 PM
    • #11

    I think when she is not retouched and you are not blinded by her makeup you can literally see into her soul. That really is why below average women are more attractive

  • The Postman
    • February 8, 2006 at 7:20 PM
    • #12
    Quote from Thrik

    Some would call that prejudicial profiling. xD

    Some would call it accurate

    Quote from RD

    I think when she is not retouched and you are not blinded by her makeup you can literally see into her soul. That really is why below average women are more attractive

    The real point is that no women look like her. They either physically can't or the laws of physics don't allow light to react like that.

    She's touched up for a reason, to be larger than life, a symbol not a reality.

  • Zacker
    • February 8, 2006 at 7:41 PM
    • #13

    I am pretty sure I would hit it regardless.

  • Fletch
    • February 8, 2006 at 7:58 PM
    • #14

    Wow, thrik burned you. Bad.

  • ReNo
    • February 8, 2006 at 8:04 PM
    • #15

    You know, I was gonna comment on the fact I preferred her without, but then I noticed in the "why we did this" thing that she is only 14. Now I just feel like a god damn pervert. Great.

  • The Postman
    • February 8, 2006 at 8:27 PM
    • #16
    Quote from ReNo

    You know, I was gonna comment on the fact I preferred her without, but then I noticed in the "why we did this" thing that she is only 14. Now I just feel like a god damn pervert. Great.

    Ewwww, that's what I get for not reading the text. Now I feel icky

  • Minos
    • February 8, 2006 at 9:57 PM
    • #17

    Hah that's great. Some time ago the dudes at the brazilian playboy were retouching some pics but they accidentaly took away the chick's bellybutton:

    [Blocked Image: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/colunas/ooops/images/20051207-andreza.gif]

  • Thrik
    • February 8, 2006 at 9:58 PM
    • #18

    Hahaha, I didn't notice that. D:

    *undoes masturbation**

    * No.

  • Tequila
    • February 8, 2006 at 10:08 PM
    • #19
    Quote from RD

    I think when she is not retouched and you are not blinded by her makeup you can literally see into her soul. That really is why below average women are more attractive

    RD, your pearls of wisdom enlighten me every single day.

  • sensee
    • February 8, 2006 at 10:21 PM
    • #20
    Quote from DelaZ

    http://demo.fb.se/e/girlpower/retouch/It%27s sad...

    hehe I remember there was a thread where some mapcorians photoshoped pictures of ugly girls...

    http://www.mapcore.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2235

    and the starter was... DelaZ!!

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Custom Gamemodes Contest

    Angel
    July 20, 2026 at 11:46 AM
  2. FAQ

    Angel
    July 20, 2026 at 10:14 AM
  3. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  4. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  5. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  6. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  7. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  8. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  9. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  10. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™