Quote from The PostmanLike I said though, Klein, they won't because they can't. It'd be suicidal for them to. Not to mention it'd destroy their monuments and religiously significant areas as well. What muslim nation would support Iran's actions after they nuked the Dome of the Rock?
it's not worth the risk. a nation who openly makes statements like that shouldn't be given the power to develop and later, threaten us with nuclear weapons.
Agreed with Klein.
Oh, and I have no idea what I'm still doing here! Mabise and Kosmo: succes!
You two deserve each other. 
Its not the nations themselves that pose the serious risk where nuclear weapons are involved, the law of large numbers basically safe-guards us against nuclear apocalypse, no large legislative body is going to collectively decide to mutually assure their own destruction with another nation.
In fact nuclear weapons may well have saved millions of lives during the cold war by stabilizing both nations. Similarly for India - Pakistan
The risk is in the individuals. Clearly the USA is not going to arm some splinter faction with a nuclear weapon to go destroy Syria or North Korea.
But Iran, well that's a question isnt it. They support jihaddists, as do the majority of the middle eastern nations (though not nationally.)
Many experts have also speculated that Iran acquiring nuclear weapons would spark an arms race in the middle east that would incorporate Saudia Arabia Syria and Egypt into the list of nations with nukes.
I think if that happened we would end up in a very serious situation indeed. No more nuclear proliferation, it's irrelevant who already has weapons.
Whether or not Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the planet, every braincell in my head is saying that people in Iran are not stupid enough to use nuclear weapons against another nation.
Iran knows what will happen once they use a nuke (or even attempt to use one) on, let's say Israel.
->
the USA finally gets the green light they've been looking for on the Iran situation and...
*SNAP*
Iran turned into rubble.
I can't imagine how Iran wouldn't see this one coming. Religion can cause war , but attacking another country with nukes is suicide.
I wouldn't know about religion though, I don't believe in shit
Hmm i wonder what religion all those suicidebombers came from :roll:
Hmm i wonder what kind of skin color all those suicidebombers has :roll:
Why let a government who enjoy's the fact that israeli's are killed by suicide bombs have nukes? More to the point, why give a country who are led by fanatics have nukes when if they martyr themselves they get 50 virgins in heaven? They dont really care if they die do they? At least from the mass ammounts of suicide bombing happening in that region, I'd say they dont care very much if they live or die. Which leads me to believe they dont care if they die as long as they get rid of the infidels (US and Israel).
Quote from mawibseHmm i wonder what kind of skin color all those suicidebombers has :roll:
Congratulations, you are the 1000th customer of pointmissed 
The mullahs arent rational, it would be blasphemy. I think they would probably commit suicide believing its self defense.
Remember the cold war? None of those countries wanted to commit suicide, but it happened anyway.
Quote from RDRemember the cold war? None of those countries wanted to commit suicide, but it happened anyway.
Wait, what? Are you saying that the Cold War boiled over? Where was I during the nuclear holocaust?
One thing people seem to forget is that they suicide bomb, we shoot long range missiles and bomb them with fighter jets.
Now why is that?
Oh yeah, religious extremists don't have long range missiles and fighter jets, they have explosives and no time to plan the attack, means to deliver the bomb other than running there and blowing everything up is pretty much it.
Or do you honestly think that they would do it still if they had some Tomahawks?
Quote from RDCongratulations, you are the 1000th customer of pointmissed
The mullahs arent rational, it would be blasphemy. I think they would probably commit suicide believing its self defense.
Remember the cold war? None of those countries wanted to commit suicide, but it happened anyway.
Hehe not only did I miss it, it was so far off I didnt even think there was one.
... what was the point?
Quote from KosmoOne thing people seem to forget is that they suicide bomb, we shoot long range missiles and bomb them with fighter jets.Now why is that?
Oh yeah, religious extremists don't have long range missiles and fighter jets, they have explosives and no time to plan the attack, means to deliver the bomb other than running there and blowing everything up is pretty much it.
Or do you honestly think that they would do it still if they had some Tomahawks?
And why dont they have tomahawks? :roll:
Why didnt the British govenment give them tomahawks, or any government? Why werent they made generals in command of armies? Because theyre fruitcakes
Quote from RDAnd why dont they have tomahawks? :roll:Why didnt the British govenment give them tomahawks, or any government? Why werent they made generals in command of armies? Because theyre fruitcakes
And that has to do with something because?
Leaders of several nations are complete nutcases, they have Tomahawks.
Quote from KosmoAnd that has to do with something because?
Leaders of several nations are complete nutcases, they have Tomahawks.
You were saying the reason they suicidebomb is because they have no tomahawks. But the reason they have no tomahawks is because theyre fruitcakes.
Sooo the reason they suicidebomb is because theyre fruitcakes. What was your point anyway?
Quote from RDYou were saying the reason they suicidebomb is because they have no tomahawks. But the reason they have no tomahawks is because theyre fruitcakes. Sooo the reason they suicidebomb is because theyre fruitcakes. What was your point anyway?
The point that you completely missed was that they are not actually "ooh, scary fruitcake people who are completely different from us, making suicide bombing and eating babies" liek you are saying, I consider those in power to be equally insane who sit behind their desk and shoot innocent people with Tomahawks.
A perspective you seem to always completely ignore in every discussion.
Islamic nations are by definition opposed to western values, given the option between American imperialism, and islamic fascism, who in their right mind could choose islam. Theres absolutely no comparison between the degree of responsibility a country like the United States would excercise with those weapons versus iran or a comparable nation. Iran is ruled by a total maniac, read some of his press-conferences!!
As unsafe as I would feel in a world where the President of Iran would have some superweapons, is as unsafe as I feel now when a fundamental christian like Geroge Bush and his lying bunch of merry men is in charge of the most dangerous nation in the world.
I don't care what people say, what matters is what they DO, and USA has proven that it is the most dargerous nation in the face of the earth, it has killed innocent people and destroyed homes and hospitals in wars that it has started with no actual evidence at all.
It is as unjustified and unforgivable as actions that have taken place in Chechnya and Tibet.
Quote from KosmoThe point that you completely missed was that they are not actually "ooh, scary fruitcake people who are completely different from us, making suicide bombing and eating babies" liek you are saying, I consider those in power to be equally insane who sit behind their desk and shoot innocent people with Tomahawks.
A perspective you seem to always completely ignore in every discussion.
Quote me saying they are "ooh, scary fruitcake people who are completely different from us, making suicide bombing and eating babies".
This fantasy going off in your head must stop.
Anybody intentionally taking innocent life is screwed up. You dont have to explain that suicidebombers are humans, or how understandable beheadings are. They are fruitcakes.
It's basically what you are saying all the time, you were earlier so proud of your superior tolerance and the "widely known dutch tolerance" and now you come out like a racist.
You are all the time, implying that Muslims are evil by default, and that our moral is far superior to their, even though wars started by western countries has killed many more of them than their terrorist attacks, not to mention that we have turned homes, schools and hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan in to dust.
Quote from RDHmm i wonder what religion all those suicidebombers came from :roll:
Just face it, you have a problem in your brain, and that is racism, you are actually the worst kind of racist, you somehow justify your racism and don't admit that you are a racist.
Yeah, RD what where you trying to tell us with "Hmm i wonder what religion all those suicidebombers came from :roll: "??
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
