hmmm what an odd conversation we're having
perhaps I should chime in and clear a few things up.
First of all, Taylor is right about counter strike. Counterstrike as a game is fun because of its mix of realism and total arcade insanity... I wouldn't change a damn thing about that game and that's why I don't play any of the other realistic tactical shooters... because they're far too realistic.
As far as BiA goes (and please don't argue with DD about this given his relative infancy with the project) realism is something we're using to tell a story. For example, some games make a bunch of things realistic for the sake of being so, but don't balance the game around it... like bleeding to death or breaking your leg or having to hold your breath underwater... yadda yadda yadda. If you add in gameplay mechanics you have to balance them out in the gameplay or you have a shitty game... With BiA we based the gameplay around squads and real guns and people... and I'm sure everyone's like real guns != fun. But they can if done correctly... you have to add nuance so when you pick up a bar as opposed to a thompson... there's a difference that's obvious and useful in terms of gameplay.
I'm rambling... the games gonna be fun. Not because we used realism... because it's fun.
now lets all have cake.