1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

The Island & Product placement

  • FrieChamp
  • August 25, 2005 at 3:18 PM
  • FrieChamp
    • August 25, 2005 at 3:18 PM
    • #1

    I watched "The Island" with Ewan Mc Gregor and Scarlett Johannsson~ last night. Cool movie, nothing too extraordinary though. However I was surprised how much they blew up and trashed, didn't expect that. One thing which bothered me slightly was a distinct inconsistence in the design of the world, some parts looked very futuristic while others looked exactly like today. But I guess that is the compromise between "near" and "future".

    A different issue I noticed was the massive product placement in the movie. It started with X-Box logos in the virtual reality videogame arena, chevrolet cars, calvin klein advertisements, msn search and that futuristic boat which actually plays a role in the story IS a real boat! I don't know if videos of it have been posted here, but it's one of those f'kin expensive, high-end boats. Way to boost your sales ("Oooh look it's that cool boat from the island...").

    Anyone else here who watched the movie?

    Scarlett Johannsson was flamin' hot by the way, I didn't recognize her from "Lost in translation" at first. Amazing what losing a couple of pounds, a different haircut, makeup and tight clothes can do...

    [Blocked Image: http://www2.filmweb.no/multimedia/archive/00022/Lost_in_Translation_22243b.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://www.uncut.at/filme/lost-in-translation/b09.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://a.abclocal.go.com/images/012405_johansson.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://hollywood.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/scarlettjohansson4.jpg]

    [Blocked Image: http://www.nidwirkli.ch/pic/bg_island_1.jpg]

  • skdr
    • August 25, 2005 at 3:23 PM
    • #2

    whaaaa! Scarlett is hottttt

  • Kosmo
    • August 25, 2005 at 5:17 PM
    • #3

    Nice rack, I.Q. of a child, I'd say she is hot

  • Mazy
    • August 25, 2005 at 5:19 PM
    • #4

    It was better than I expected, but nothing special really. Even the action was kinda shallow, and thats usually the only good thing about Michael Bay movies.

    Anyway, you're forgetting Apple and Puma product placement as well. But yeah, it was horrible with all that product placement and it just made the movie worse instead of helping it.

    Also, Scarlett

  • jimius
    • August 25, 2005 at 5:34 PM
    • #5

    Anybody notice the giant Microsoft skyscraper?

  • Izuno
    • August 25, 2005 at 7:27 PM
    • #6

    yeah this movie started off very good with this cool and interesting premise. then it just became another Michael Bay glorified chase sequence over the second half. the only thing that saved it from that point was Scarlett flaming hotness that was just a pleasure to watch. Also, I think they gave her some crappy dialogue, but she managed to do a decent job with it. pants off to her...i mean...hats off to her for donig an okay job with crappy writing.

    the product placement was crazy. i don't mind it for some realisim sometimes, but in this movie it seemed sooooooooooooooo obvious and not in a fun kind of way like in the Back to the Future movies.

    i would give this a movie a thumbs up just to watch Scarlett in all her hotness, but that's about it.

  • DaanO
    • August 25, 2005 at 7:35 PM
    • #7

    1) Scarlett Johansson was hotter in Lost in Translation, by far. But still hot in this movie.

    2) Interesting premise indeed, but then it turned into a chaos of fights, explosions, plot holes and ...

    3) Brand names. Lots of them. IF YOU LIKE THIS MOVIE PLEASE BUY PUMA SHOES AS WELL KTHNXBAI

  • Mojo
    • August 25, 2005 at 7:41 PM
    • #8

    The Xbox was the worse, since this was obviously in the future and Xbox wouldn't be around any more. It would be like X-1000, Super Xbox, X64 or the X-Cube, or some fifth generation name.

  • GrayFox
    • August 25, 2005 at 7:50 PM
    • #9

    I couldn't care less about product placement. I agree with you guys about the movie itself, though.

  • Jezpuh
    • August 25, 2005 at 10:04 PM
    • #10

    What, scarlett isn't hot.

  • ginsengavenger
    • August 25, 2005 at 10:25 PM
    • #11

    much hawter as the girl next door.

  • Hipshot
    • August 25, 2005 at 11:16 PM
    • #12

    Scarlet looks a bit like my friends gf (she is also a actor, but swedish), just a bit though scarlet is probably taller.

  • The Postman
    • August 26, 2005 at 3:24 AM
    • #13

    Fuck that movie. Period.

    Worst and most blatantly pervasive product placement I've ever seen.

  • TomWithTheWeather
    • August 26, 2005 at 3:29 AM
    • #14

    I liked it for what it was. I could care less about the product placement. It wasn't like they'd pause, turn to the camera, and say "Drink Coke!". Shoot, I probably missed half the adverts.

    It wasn't the best movie or anything, but it entertained me and that's all that mattered.

  • Skjalg
    • August 26, 2005 at 8:04 AM
    • #15

    gotta remember that "product placements" or whatever you call it, actually (in a weird way) also adds to realism...

    What city wouldnt have giant posters with commercial in it?

  • FrieChamp
    • August 26, 2005 at 8:43 AM
    • #16

    The Calvin Klein advertisement and stuff was fine, you barely noticed it. But when the virtual reality videogame thing has a big "X-BOX" logo on it, or the information booth to look up residents' adresses is called "MSN SEARCH", then the motives are too blatantly obvious.

  • Alf-Life
    • August 26, 2005 at 6:22 PM
    • #17

    Yeah, I have to say, I don't usually mind product placement - especially in TV shows where advertisers have to find new ways in now people just TIVO out the ads... but having said that, the Puma and Xbox did annoy me.

    Things like the iPod being in War of the Worlds, I didn't even notice first time really - stuff like that is fine.

    It would've been better if, say, the Pumas hadn't had a sole shot dedicated to them to show us they were Pumas, but I guess they paid money and didn't want them half-cropped from the screen or in the background blurred... which imho would have been better.

  • JynxDaddy
    • August 27, 2005 at 3:51 AM
    • #18

    iPod in War of the Worlds?

  • Kosmo
    • August 27, 2005 at 2:34 PM
    • #19

    Well, I robot was the ultimate in product placement, every other word was some company name. It made me sick, and then healthy and then sick again. Besides, the movie sucked ass, so that makes it even worse.

  • Taylor Swift
    • August 28, 2005 at 3:31 PM
    • #20

    scarlett? She looks damn hot !!!

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Custom Gamemodes Contest

    Angel
    July 20, 2026 at 11:46 AM
  2. FAQ

    Angel
    July 20, 2026 at 10:14 AM
  3. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  4. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  5. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  6. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  7. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  8. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  9. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  10. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™