I just played one game with bots (to get to know the map and layout), so I don't know how this plays out in a real match. What I can tell so far is (just a little bit of amateur analysis):
+ I like the layout: it gives a lot of opportunities for variation in round tactics and rotations
Why? You can flank almost every path on the map and change your intended target on the map.
/ 3 entrances to middle for Ts give the impression it's a tough ask for CTs to defend (they also arrive later there?)
This results in:
Ts can close out A with mid-control, while A already feels like it is easier to take/retake
Spot B has less benefit/impact from mid-control while it is already harder to take (presumably), although you have three entrance points for that as well
- There's a lot to check on B when attacking/retaking
All in all I like what I'm seeing. 
You should consider chainging map name before its too late,i have seen leaks of Valve made map called de_tvstation,
has a lot of potential make it as good as Ramis and it is sure going to get into Operation.
Quote from RAD23 hours ago, RAD said: You should consider chainging map name before its too late,i have seen leaks of Valve made map called de_tvstation,
has a lot of potential make it as good as Ramis and it is sure going to get into Operation.
Yea we've seen about TV_Station already and spoken to Valve if it would be an issue. Studio was the new name to diverge away from the TV station / Broadcast name as well as slightly modifying our theme to go with the new name.
Thanks for the concern though, I appreciate it.
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
