1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Level Design

[WIP] de_canaveral

  • NihiL
  • February 28, 2016 at 11:34 AM
  • NihiL
    • February 28, 2016 at 11:34 AM
    • #1

    Hello everybody.

    This is it, after de_spice I'm back with my second CS:GO map: de_canaveral (working title) and it takes place in a building complex of a certain four-lettered space agency. Of course, the map is purely fictional and not based on any real building or anything.


    Settings, Story and Terrorist Motivation

    One of the core aspects I learned about from criticism of my first map was that a cohesive setting and story is very important to people. So this time around, it's all about a new alternative rocket propulsion prototype that this space agency is developing that shows promise of being much more potent than conventional solid or liquid rocket thrust. Serious environmental concerns have arisen and, after demonstrations and protests have not achieved government intervention, a group of people has formed that are willing to do whatever it takes to stop the project.

    This setting allows me to re-use the new de_nuke assets but I am prepared to supply custom textures and models as well. The general tone of these space agency facilities is very bright and clean making for great contrast against darker player models!


    Layout

    Let me show you the first version of the layout that I just finished:

    [Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/LFVVfVD.png]

    As you can tell, de_canaveral is a modern midless map as I was growing a little tired of Dust 2/Mirage rip-offs (which my first map de_spice certainly was guilty of as well). This is more in the vein of de_cbble or de_overpass as far as the layout is concerned. Ultimately, the map currently is very compact. I do think it has everything it needs for now but it still feels small. As far as design, I played with some interesting non-90 degree geometry. Essentially segments of the level (instances) are either grid aligned or 30 degrees rotated to the left. It will be a challenge to line these up in Hammer!

    Cover and other room objects are not in the sketch and will be added later. The lines between the pillars at the balcony near bombsite A are breakable glass windows. The curved wall near connector consists of boarded up windows which you can't see through but can wallbang and throw nades over to prepare an A take. Also, the long sight line from CT spawn through the bombsite B to outside will be blocked with cover at the bombsite, I don't want this to be a one-dimensional sniper shooting range!

    Another important goal for this design was to counter two trends that I see in new Operation maps and that I personally dislike (and I've seen this reflected on reddit a bit as well): Too many connectors (I want to resist the urge to add a connector from control room to A for example etc.) and angles that are very long range and heavily favor AWP usage. This is not meant as an insult to the highly talented mapmakers of Cruise, Tulip, Empire and so on, just my personal taste if you will.


    What's Next

    So that's where I'm at right now - a Photoshop sketch. I want to get this past you and some other players/testers that I know (essentially if Global Elites think it's okay then that's good haha) and then start with a Sasha Greybox. Then we'll test and refine that and start converting it into the full and final map.


    I'm very interested to hear your thoughts and concerns about the layout. Thanks ahead of time and cheers!

  • Freaky_Banana
    • February 28, 2016 at 5:24 PM
    • #2

    I already love the layout (I am currently working on a rather similar one myself concerning A) and I bet the style would make for an awesome visual appeal as well.

    My only concern looking at the layout, is that B may be T-sided since you will always have the possibility of a pinsirs movement by Ts from control room. You will have to make the entrances rather narrow and easy to defend for the defending CTs (if its intended to have three CTs there that wouldn't be a problem though). Also the map will probably play very rush-heavy, since the CTs do not really get any intell on what is going on before the Ts all blow into the site. To avoid this problem it will be very important that A main is so open that CTs can gain control of the way from connector to lobby with sniper rifles when they push to right beneath the curved glass wall at A.

    But as I said I love the theme and the layout in general and this is really some very hypothetical nitpicking and these problems are probably easy to avoid. Oh and block the sightline from balcony to CT spawn with something fat on the rocketpad please, so that CTs have a chance to retake from multiple positions.

    Keep up the great work! Cheers!

  • NihiL
    • February 28, 2016 at 8:38 PM
    • #3
    Quote from Freaky_Banana

    I already love the layout (I am currently working on a rather similar one myself concerning A) and I bet the style would make for an awesome visual appeal as well.

    My only concern looking at the layout, is that B may be T-sided since you will always have the possibility of a pinsirs movement by Ts from control room. You will have to make the entrances rather narrow and easy to defend for the defending CTs (if its intended to have three CTs there that wouldn't be a problem though). Also the map will probably play very rush-heavy, since the CTs do not really get any intell on what is going on before the Ts all blow into the site. To avoid this problem it will be very important that A main is so open that CTs can gain control of the way from connector to lobby with sniper rifles when they push to right beneath the curved glass wall at A.

    But as I said I love the theme and the layout in general and this is really some very hypothetical nitpicking and these problems are probably easy to avoid. Oh and block the sightline from balcony to CT spawn with something fat on the rocketpad please, so that CTs have a chance to retake from multiple positions.

    Keep up the great work! Cheers!

    Thank you very much for your positive words so far! I do hope it gives me a chance to make a great environment visually because it 'plays more into my cards' so to speak, my previous map was run-down and Dust-y and I don't think I can do that as well as I can do stylish clean architecture!

    The default CT setup I have in mind would have two on A (one for A main, one for balcony), two on B (exhibition hall/outside) and one for the dropdown. Alternatively one B player can double up in dropdown. This is exactly like in de_cbble pretty much.

    Good point with the sightline from balcony to CT spawn, that needs to be obstructed indeed! Aiming for something like ticket booth to palace on de_mirage probably!

    Thanks again for the kind words and suggestions, let me know if there's anything else!

  • Freaky_Banana
    • February 28, 2016 at 11:24 PM
    • #4

    The content cannot be displayed because it is no longer available. Ok so here is my concern (just to elaborate the idea; sightlines are in brown for Ts, pink for CTs; standard spots I'd expect brown for Ts and blue for CTs)

    1. Ts smoke off A main (in your standard setup Ts don't even have to do this! a flash ould probably be enough)

    - Option 1: surprise push the smoke with flashes while also pushing balcony

    - Option 2: 2. pull the ramp guy towards dropdown

    3. B guys push while simultaneously balcony pushes as a lurk. He can kill the CTs rotating from A through CT (and they cant really push A main because of the smoke)

    By doing this we have three CTs left in B against 4 Ts with one rotating CT (who wasn't killed by the lurk yet ) caught in a firefight with the lurk on A towards CT. The dropper Ts should be able to kill the one CT (even if that means losing one T) and therefore doing a pinsirs movement onto the two CTs remaining in B (who are fighting against the outside and the B main T). This should allow for Ts to get an easy advantage over the CTs in the site.

    What I am essentially saying here, is that CTs should get intell with a sightline from below balcony into A main- connector-Lobby area to be able to prepare pushes better.These are just my thoughts though and maybe I am just overexaggerating the power of A main/connector as a rotation path to B.

    Anyways, cheers!


    EDIT: Oh and another thing, make the main CT entrance to B so wide, that it is not smokeable with only one smoke, otherwise that's two incredibly strong smokes winning the round for Ts!!)

  • NihiL
    • February 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM
    • #5

    First of all, thank you very much for the in-depth post @Freaky_Banana, your drawing helped a lot for me to understand your point better. I do see what you're saying but I'm not sure if this problem you're describing isn't also present on other popular maps. Can you for example try and explain how the same scenario would work out on de_cbble?

    My first issue is that if Ts smoke A main they're just smoking themselves in pretty much? At that point they can only push the smoke (which has them at a big disadvantage) or go through balcony where at least one CT is looking. I see this situation identically on de_cache's A bombsite for example where balcony is squeaky door.

    As to your second point, the CT rotations post-plant, my logic was that every bombsite has three entrances which can be used for takes and retakes which seems to be the standard when I again think of any other map.

    I don't want to sound defensive and dismiss your criticism, hopefully my post doesn't come across as such, my main problem is really that I don't see how your described problem doesn't take place exactly the same on other popular midless maps! I'd love it if you could contrast my layout to de_cbble, as I said, and let me know what you think the differences are.

    Cheers! Working on a greybox now!

  • jackophant
    • February 29, 2016 at 5:31 PM
    • #6

    Honestly can't and don't want to say much about a sketch.

    I'd like to reserve judgement and feedback until the greybox is live!

  • Freaky_Banana
    • February 29, 2016 at 6:01 PM
    • #7
    Quote from jackophant

    Honestly can't and don't want to say much about a sketch.

    I'd like to reserve judgement and feedback until the greybox is live!

    Well probably this is true here ^^, but I'd yet like to answer Nihil in this case.

    Quote from NihiL

    First of all, thank you very much for the in-depth post @Freaky_Banana, your drawing helped a lot for me to understand your point better. I do see what you're saying but I'm not sure if this problem you're describing isn't also present on other popular maps. Can you for example try and explain how the same scenario would work out on de_cbble?

    Well, I am definitely not an expert on cobble (as well as midless maps so do not take my criticism for super intelligent ) and therefore I can not really explain this. I wouldn't even know where to look for a spot on which my criticism would apply as well .

    Quote from NihiL

    My first issue is that if Ts smoke A main they're just smoking themselves in pretty much? At that point they can only push the smoke (which has them at a big disadvantage) or go through balcony where at least one CT is looking. I see this situation identically on de_cache's A bombsite for example where balcony is squeaky door.

    For this one I think it's a lot about mindgames. Have one guy flashing into B about 5 or 10 seconds after smoking A main and one CT on A will probably start to rotate (this is of course dependant on skilllevel, but I think I am talking for the average GN matchmaking here and the map is supposed to play well for as many players as possible). It is supposedly the one who was looking A main before, since he is closer to B. This will leave one guy still watching actively for an A push from within the site, which should make for an easy time for Terrorists to flash themselves out of A main and get the moment of surprise (one CT has his back turned, the other is watching two entrances at once).

    Quote from NihiL

    As to your second point, the CT rotations post-plant, my logic was that every bombsite has three entrances which can be used for takes and retakes which seems to be the standard when I again think of any other map.

    I guess you are right here, To my disgrace I must admitt that I didn't think about the timings of the B take compared to CT rotations when writing the post...

    Then again I do think it may be hard to retake from lobby, if the way into B main is a stair, since the T in outside will always have a hardcore advantage over you as a CT pushing a (comparatively) narrow stair. But referring to Jackophant here, I guess we will just have to see how the playtest goes here.

    Quote from NihiL

    I don't want to sound defensive and dismiss your criticism, hopefully my post doesn't come across as such, my main problem is really that I don't see how your described problem doesn't take place exactly the same on other popular midless maps! [...]

    Cheers! Working on a greybox now!

    Don't worry you do not dismiss my criticism in any way. Even just taking the time to reply already shows me that you're thinking about it . And if anything then my criticism is extremely aggressive, really pushing strategies to the verge of what could ever happen in a normal game of CSGO .

    Last but not least: Wow I am hyped to see that greybox:dance: !

    Cheers!

  • baem123
    • February 29, 2016 at 9:45 PM
    • #8

    Hi Nihil,

    thats a neat setting. Great idea! I immediately started to imagine how this rocket launchpad area could look like.

    My eyes like this presentation and your layout a lot, but my gamesense says it would be boring for the CTs.
    Since A and B directly connect to the CT spawn, CTs could play around the area the whole game.
    Terrorists have much longer rotation times. If you are a T and you go to the "Exhibition Hall" or the "Outside" area, you already commited yourself to go to B.
    There is no easy way out. You cant reach the "control room", you could only go back to the lobby.

    Im pretty sure that you need to give both CTs and Ts more options, but ofc jackophant is right: we need a playtest asap.

  • Lykrast
    • March 1, 2016 at 9:08 PM
    • #9

    The setting seems interesting, and the layout seems nice. I'll look forward to this map once the first version is available.

  • NihiL
    • March 2, 2016 at 12:02 AM
    • #10

    Thank you @Lykrast!

    Okay I've sorta put your two points together @baem123 and @Freaky_Banana and came up with version 2 of the layout. I agree that previously having only one way from CT spawn to A and B just wasn't cutting it and absolutely agree that it's boring to have to go B from exhibition hall. So here it is:

    [Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/YZs5qEY.png]

    CTs can now go to B from Control Room or the left flank. And Ts can now go from the Exhibition Hall to A if they make it through instead of B.

    Is this better? Any further thoughts/ideas/concerns?

  • baem123
    • March 2, 2016 at 10:18 PM
    • #11

    Yes, this looks better.

    [Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/uAjJBqY.png]

    I dont know if you already wanted to block the view from the higher ground along the red lines? Id suggest it. Otherwise it could get really difficult to hold A.

    Maybe the yellow passage should be a one way passage from "ct spawn" to the "control room". The loss of this blue sniper line could make it easier for Ts.
    Depends on the way youd build it. One option could simply be a catwalk above the orange line in the control room. This catwalk could be connected to theCT spawn
    but not avaiable from the connector. Below the catwalk could be the big display board of the control room. im sure you had your own ideas for this room already.

    imho this is a good 2d layout. we can find more shortcomings in the greybox playtest.

  • El_Exodus
    • March 2, 2016 at 10:29 PM
    • #12

    It's time for a greybox. Basic feedback might be possible by looking at the radar, but for anything else it's not really good anymore. Just do it!

  • baem123
    • March 2, 2016 at 10:31 PM
    • #13

    hes doing it already

  • Sjonsson
    • March 3, 2016 at 8:17 AM
    • #14

    Does this topdown look like a PS1 disc casing on purpose? Haha!

    Edit: I was overwhelmed by the design that I forgot to say; looking forward to see the blockout!

  • laminutederire
    • March 3, 2016 at 8:42 AM
    • #15

    Let's hope we'll playtest it soon.

    However absolutely no rocket can be launched in a such a tight space, maybe say if is a museum with a real size rocket model :) but that's a detail!

  • Logic
    • March 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM
    • #16
    Quote from laminutederire

    Let's hope we'll playtest it soon.

    However absolutely no rocket can be launched in a such a tight space, maybe say if is a museum with a real size rocket model but that's a detail!

    This is true. Maybe it could be a rig where the engines are tested before the real launch? I'm sure they test them beforehand, but maybe check up on that fact

    Layout looks good, but as other people have stated, it needs to be built to see what works and what doesn't. Some angles looks long but in-game you'll spot this right away and can easily prevent them. :)

  • laminutederire
    • March 3, 2016 at 8:58 AM
    • #17
    Quote from Logic

    This is true. Maybe it could be a rig where the engines are tested before the real launch? I'm sure they test them beforehand, but maybe check up on that fact

    I've seen a video of nasa testing a combustion engine... the flame went on a few meters, that could be cool to see in a map ;)

  • Logic
    • March 3, 2016 at 9:12 AM
    • #18
    Quote from laminutederire

    I've seen a video of nasa testing a combustion engine... the flame went on a few meters, that could be cool to see in a map

    Confirmed map feature: CT's can push a button which fires the engines and engulfs the entire A-site in flames, killing any T's on the site ;)

  • laminutederire
    • March 3, 2016 at 9:16 AM
    • #19
    Quote from Logic

    Confirmed map feature: CT's can push a button which fires the engines and engulfs the entire A-site in flames, killing any T's on the site

    ahaha button is in CT spawn and re usable: easy retake

    but more Seriously, you can imagine putting the same smoke that firing that type of engine causes.

    you have a one-time smoke feature for 2 or 3 seconds !

  • baem123
    • March 3, 2016 at 12:10 PM
    • #20

    a more realistic option could be a photonic propulsion laser launchpad.

    this technique allows us to push a 100kg unit to mars within some days. and its feasible with the technology we have today.

    nasa video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCDuAiA6kX0

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  2. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  3. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  4. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  5. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  6. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  7. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  8. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  9. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  10. Classic Maps Reborn For CS2

    SillySpaceCat
    May 31, 2026 at 10:33 PM

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 3 Guests
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™