1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

Wreck-It Ralph

  • -HP-
  • June 6, 2012 at 7:09 PM
  • -HP-
    • June 6, 2012 at 7:09 PM
    • #1

    http://disney.go.com/wreck-it-ralph/?cm ... eckitralph

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    "Will NPC in FPS 4 food!" xD Made me lol

    [Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/ekrzH.jpg]

  • Psy
    • June 6, 2012 at 9:33 PM
    • #2

    This is gonna be a total geekgasm.

  • Mazy
    • June 6, 2012 at 9:52 PM
    • #3

    Probably the first Disney CGI movie that I'd actually consider watching, looks like it could be fun~

  • Grinwhrl
    • June 6, 2012 at 11:14 PM
    • #4

    Looks good.

  • knj
    • June 6, 2012 at 11:18 PM
    • #5
    Quote

    Will NPC in FPS 4 food!

  • Marvin.Star
    • June 7, 2012 at 12:25 AM
    • #6

    I really like the concept! Its neat how it has a bit of a Monsters Inc. influence, with the 'fictional' hub world and what not. I hope it ends up being fantastic

  • 2d-chris
    • June 7, 2012 at 1:07 AM
    • #7

    Oh yeah baby, looks neato

  • cincinnati
    • June 7, 2012 at 1:15 AM
    • #8

    wonder why it's under the disney banner rather than pixar.

  • e-freak
    • June 7, 2012 at 2:42 AM
    • #9

    Because its a Disney movie, not Pixar. Two different studios.

  • Marvin.Star
    • June 7, 2012 at 6:11 AM
    • #10
    Quote from e-freak

    Because its a Disney movie, not Pixar. Two different studios.

    lol....

  • Puddy
    • June 7, 2012 at 6:12 AM
    • #11
    Quote from e-freak

    Because its a Disney movie, not Pixar. Two different studios.

  • knj
    • June 7, 2012 at 7:45 AM
    • #12

    hyhy

  • Thrik
    • June 7, 2012 at 10:27 AM
    • #13

    This looks great! I get a genuinely lovely vibe off the trailer and feel kind of nostalgic now, it's clearly something of a love letter to those of us who grew up with these kind of games in their prime. Hopefully they bring some of their CGI-meets-traditional-art techniques over from Tangled (actually a really good film that deserves to stand alongside all Disney's 'typical' princess films).

  • Sentura
    • June 7, 2012 at 11:25 AM
    • #14

    probably first animated movies ive been looking forward to in years

  • cincinnati
    • June 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM
    • #15
    Quote from e-freak

    Because its a Disney movie, not Pixar. Two different studios.

    that's not what i was getting at.

    disney owns pixar...it uses pixar tropes...just seems to fall more under pixar's brand.

  • 2d-chris
    • June 7, 2012 at 2:48 PM
    • #16

    Just because you own a studio or brand doesn't mean you can slap it on the product, people are smarter than that.

  • Thrik
    • June 7, 2012 at 3:10 PM
    • #17
    Quote from cincinnati

    that's not what i was getting at.

    disney owns pixar...it uses pixar tropes...just seems to fall more under pixar's brand.

    It's pretty funny how Pixar became the new Disney after Disney really dropped the ball during the 2000s and failed to put out many worthwhile films — the assumption of total quality people once had for Disney films became Pixar's thing instead.

    I think Disney is trying to undo the damage of their weak last decade (especially in comparison to the amazing stuff they put out in the 90s) by once again becoming a family film powerhouse in its own right. The last two I've seen are The Princess and the Frog and Tangled, and they're both splendid. This looks like it'll continue their new trend of quality films.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Di ... on_Studios

  • cincinnati
    • June 7, 2012 at 4:16 PM
    • #18
    Quote from 2d-chris

    Just because you own a studio or brand doesn't mean you can slap it on the product, people are smarter than that.

    not what i meant by that but i suppose i'm being lazy in my explanation.

    Quote from Thrik

    It's pretty funny how Pixar became the new Disney after Disney really dropped the ball during the 2000s and failed to put out many worthwhile films — the assumption of total quality people once had for Disney films became Pixar's thing instead.

    I think Disney is trying to undo the damage of their weak last decade (especially in comparison to the amazing stuff they put out in the 90s) by once again becoming a family film powerhouse in its own right. The last two I've seen are The Princess and the Frog and Tangled, and they're both splendid. This looks like it'll continue their new trend of quality films.

    this is more what i'm onto...it seems that disney is muddying the distinction between "brands" by taking a lot of lessons from pixar.. not content to rip almost exclusively from timeless fairy tales and sanitize them (which takes us right up to both princess and the frog and tangled (read:rapunzel)...but it is now creating a mythology around the accessories of (contemporary) childhood, ripping from pop culture, and throwing a bigger bone to the adults in the room (some of the things that put pixar where it is). usually, when a studio owns multiple brands, there is some default communication about what can be expected via that branding. not the best example, as it's not animation, but look at disney's touchstone, which says, "this is still family friendly, but it's darker." now look at the internet and see how many people are mistaking this for a pixar film. makes me wonder if disney is going to gobble up pixar's name, too.

  • e-freak
    • June 7, 2012 at 6:18 PM
    • #19

    Disney has a history of "porting" fairytales, but it's not the first time that they went with something more contemporary. Bolt, Dionsaurs, Lilo & Stitch and a couple more movies were done by Disney before which didn't have Fairytale backgrounds.

    I see your point, but keep in mind that Disney Animation Studios is not Disney Corp.. Disney is the head company and similar to Fox and other Networks in the US it's a Publisher for multiple studios. Disney Animation and Pixar are probably as close to each other as Dice and Respawn, both owned and published by EA but completely different technology and franchises. And both big enough within the Network structure to chose and create their own IPs, rather than being used as "of the mill"-studios.

  • selmitto
    • June 8, 2012 at 1:36 AM
    • #20

    There's a game right here: http://disney.go.com/wreck-it-ralph/

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Custom Gamemodes Contest

    Angel
    July 20, 2026 at 11:46 AM
  2. FAQ

    Angel
    July 20, 2026 at 10:14 AM
  3. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  4. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  5. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  6. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  7. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  8. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  9. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  10. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™