I don't know actually. I just liked the way it looked. ![]()
Do you know what it means?
I don't know actually. I just liked the way it looked. ![]()
Do you know what it means?
GOD IMAGESHACK
I wish I could see some of your screens but it feels like I am on dialup when I click imageshack links so I never let them load.
Has nobody else noticed that imageshack sucks shit? Nobody decided to use another host?
google is useful!
Quote from Sindwiller@ SomethingPretty nice looking map...
just..
http://img64.imageshack.us/my.php?image ... 010zl9.jpg
What's Prom5?
ferry 5?
Ah ok, thanks. I might want to change that.
just had to take some time off from grale so i made a new quake/unreal kinda map roughly 15 hours of work so far
lets say im just goofin around with geo again ![]()
texturing needs no mention i pressume... and uhm that also counts for the lighting.
pics are 1600x1200 and theyre *once again* pretty dark for some folks *yes i do know my monitor is a little bright ghehe*
[Blocked Image: http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/4875/dmxdiffector40004cq7.th.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/2446/dmxdiffector40005qb3.th.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/413/dmxdiffector40007yn1.th.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/6868/dmxdiffector40008py1.th.jpg]
also for those who know and/or are interested.
just to be clear im still working on grale but progress is very slow right now.
since i never actually finished a map before and a map at this scale takes a damn f*cking lot of work.
especially since im also working on my modeling and texturing skills *not that grale has any of my own currently* and i have a more than fulltime job right now.
ill show of some new stuff when its ready so really no saying when that will be
yes it's too dark for me! ![]()
But with that I can see, your structure seems good!
Now you must add some details, add more variation with your materials,put some mdls and work your lights! ![]()
lol yes it's a good start!
Yeah, way too dark there. Are you using a CRT perchance? One critical issue with CRTs that affects any kind of visual work is that over time they lose their tone gamut, which means darks become darker and eventually dark greys/colours merge into just black, and it gets increasingly worse. People usually pump up their brightness/contrast/etc to compensate but invariably end up making it look like a mess for people on properly calibrated monitors like mine.
LCDs don't suffer from this issue. If you're not using one, I suggest thinking about upgrading since you're a visual designer. If you are using an LCD, I suggest checking out some thorough calibration sites like this.
Can't see shit. ![]()
[Blocked Image: http://xs117.xs.to/xs117/07293/4l7o0gz.jpg]
Quote from ThrikYeah, way too dark there. Are you using a CRT perchance? One critical issue with CRTs that affects any kind of visual work is that over time they lose their tone gamut, which means darks become darker and eventually dark greys/colours merge into just black, and it gets increasingly worse. People usually pump up their brightness/contrast/etc to compensate but invariably end up making it look like a mess for people on properly calibrated monitors like mine.LCDs don't suffer from this issue. If you're not using one, I suggest thinking about upgrading since you're a visual designer. If you are using an LCD, I suggest checking out some thorough calibration sites like this.
tnx for the info never really heard about that before but yes im using an old 19" crt ill try to tweak it a little but i dont think it will really get better since i already tried a lot of things.
anyway my current planning is to upgrade my stuff by the end of the year so i geuss ill just have to hang in there for now
an editor shot is a little more apropiate for viewing then maybe ![]()
[Blocked Image: http://xs117.xs.to/xs117/07293/dmx_diffector_editorshot01.JPG.xs.jpg]
Quote from rockdude86an editor shot is a little more apropiate for viewing then maybe
[Blocked Image: http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/992/dmxdiffectoreditorshot0gt0.th.jpg]
you're using imageshack - so unless by viewing you mean watching a white loading page for 5 minutes before it eventually times out - then no, it's not better for viewing ![]()
Instead of bitching about Imageshack why not suggest a better image hosting site? Huh? HUH?
it's not like image hosts are rare and hard to come by. this is the internet we're talking about.
QuoteInstead of bitching about Imageshack why not suggest a better image hosting site? Huh? HUH?
He did though!
Quote from Rick_DHas nobody else noticed that imageshack sucks shit? Nobody decided to use another host?google is useful!
I recommend http://xs.to
well i havent really had problems with imageshack *apart from a minor popup :roll: * but ill use another if that pleases you ![]()
updated the pic with different host...
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!