1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

Quantum Of Solace

  • Ginger Lord
  • November 4, 2008 at 6:13 PM
  • Thrik
    • November 9, 2008 at 5:21 PM
    • #21
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    No Casino Royale is not much better then the Brosnan Bonds. Personaly i felt that when Bond reanimated his own heart in Casino Royale was one of the lowest points in the whole Bond franchise. Even Brosnan Bond firing a soviet tank while he drives it wasn't as ridiculous.

    While the realism of the self-defibrillation is arguable, it's not like stretching the limits of technology and such is exactly something new to the Bond series. To say it's one of the lowest points in the whole franchise seems absolutely ludicrous, especially considering the stuff we've seen in the Brosnan films (invisible car that also makes stuff behind it invisible) and the classics (MOONRAKER). I thought the whole scene leading up to and including the defibrillation was good and great drama.

    I'm going to reiterate that IMO Casino Royale was better than most of the Brosnan films, although I continue to think GoldenEye and Tomorrow Never Dies were great films. If you disagree, well fair enough — I don't mind if you're part of that minority.

  • Ginger Lord
    • November 9, 2008 at 5:53 PM
    • #22
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    No Casino Royale is not much better then the Brosnan Bonds. Personaly i felt that when Bond reanimated his own heart in Casino Royale was one of the lowest points in the whole Bond franchise. Even Brosnan Bond firing a soviet tank while he drives it wasn't as ridiculous.

    Self-Defibriliation isnt a ridiculous thing at all, have you any clue on what Pacemakers these days are capable of? The step from having one implanted inside the body auto-detecting heart problems to having an attachable one isnt very large.

    Saying Casino Royale is not much better than, for example Die Another Day, is absolutely ludicrous. Your allowed to have your own opinion but its a quite ridiculous one that I don't think I've ever come across, or know anyone that has vaguely the same opinion. Sure I know plenty of people that don't like Casino Royale, but they all agree its a much better film than the latter half of the Brosnan era which was downright awful.

  • Steppenwolf
    • November 9, 2008 at 8:00 PM
    • #23

    Whatever. No reason to go in angry fanboy mode...

    I basicly base my opinion on the fact that i dont remember much from all of the movies. They were all quite forgettable experiences to me so i dont see why i should rate one above the other.

    I know that the last two Bonds are a big thing for you brits because the main actor is british so dont mind me and just enjoy the movies.

  • -HP-
    • November 9, 2008 at 10:16 PM
    • #24

    lol, that makes me think about something, "realism". If you ask someone who don't like James Bond movies, why in the world they hate it so much, the answer will prolly be: "the stunts on the move are impossible, there's not a single bit of realism into it!" ... No fucking way?! that's the whole point, and 007 movie directors know that, they grab a small piece of "realism" and push it to the limits until it's fun to watch!

    Cos that's the whole point of watching a movie, pretty much like games, having a good time and having fun!

  • ctswin
    • November 10, 2008 at 12:12 AM
    • #25
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    I know that the last two Bonds are a big thing for you brits because the main actor is british so dont mind me and just enjoy the movies.

    wow

  • PogoP
    • November 10, 2008 at 2:20 AM
    • #26
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    I know that the last two Bonds are a big thing for you brits because the main actor is british so dont mind me and just enjoy the movies.

    Not forgetting the other 19 Bond films that had British actors playing Bond. :wink:

  • Steppenwolf
    • November 10, 2008 at 9:20 AM
    • #27

    My bad. Replace britain with english then and it makes more sense.

    I'm sure you guys are experts in german geography too.

  • Ginger Lord
    • November 10, 2008 at 10:30 AM
    • #28
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    My bad. Replace britain with english then and it makes more sense.

    Still leaves all the Moore,Dalton and Craig films German geography is easier because you simply have one country, not a collection of countries under various names.

    But thats besides the point.

    Anyone else seen the film? I saw some review in a paper over here gave it 1/5

  • Steppenwolf
    • November 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM
    • #29
    Quote from Ginger Lord

    German geography is easier because you simply have one country, not a collection of countries under various names.

    Actualy thats not true. Germany is a federation made of a shitload of former souvereign states and kingdoms. 1870/71 was the first time in german history that the german tribes got unified to one big country. Only Austria who lost the german war against prussia decided to stay away. Look at the mess it was before:

    http://%7Boption%7D[Blocked Image: http://www.zeno.org/Brockhaus-1911.images/I/bkklde12.jpg]

    These are the german states of today:

    http://%7Boption%7D[Blocked Image: http://home.mweb.co.za/el/elijo/graphics/o06map.jpg]

    Imagine each would have its own national team like the britains...

    Bet you didnt expect to learn something about german history in a James Bond thread

  • -HP-
    • November 10, 2008 at 11:58 AM
    • #30
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    Bet you didnt expect to learn something about german history in a James Bond thread

    Indeed, thanks man!

  • NormySan
    • November 11, 2008 at 12:41 PM
    • #31

    Saw the movie this past weekend. Liked it alot, the plot weren't the best but it definitely delivered solid movie value.

  • Punky
    • November 11, 2008 at 5:16 PM
    • #32
    Quote from NormySan

    Saw the movie this past weekend. Liked it alot, the plot weren't the best but it definitely delivered solid movie value.

    Exactly! I just saw it, and I loved it, it's a good movie, but yeah the plot wasn't perfect... It felt like the creators of the movie ran out of inspiration...

  • D3ads
    • November 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM
    • #33

    I liked it, it wasn't as good as Casino Royale but then I never expected it to be and I enjoyed what I saw, roll on Daniel Craig movie #3

  • dux
    • November 12, 2008 at 1:49 PM
    • #34

    I was sceptical when the cast Craig as bond but he gets better each time.

  • PogoP
    • November 12, 2008 at 2:33 PM
    • #35
    Quote from dux

    I was sceptical when the cast Craig as bond but he gets better each time.

    You're sceptical about everything

  • dux
    • November 12, 2008 at 2:51 PM
    • #36

    I'm British. It's my job to be.

  • Buddy
    • November 12, 2008 at 8:40 PM
    • #37

    There will be atleast 5 Craig-Bond movies (Thats what he's contracted to so far) and thats ubercool

  • Thrik
    • November 12, 2008 at 11:34 PM
    • #38

    Just saw and enjoyed it.

    The storytelling definitely wasn't as tidy as Casino Royale's, leaving little strands either unsatisfactorily closed or not closed at all. Although the overall story arc continues from Casino Royale, the aforementioned film still felt like a very complete story and in fact I didn't assume it'd be continued in Quantum of Solace until I saw the trailers.

    With Quantum of Solace, I feel like it's almost certainly going to be continued; it's one of those films where it ends and you think "FFS, they're ending it there?". But then, if they tried to cram it all into this film it wouldn't do it justice. They've kind of

    Quote

    set up this big story arc about a huge criminal organisation that we've only scratched the surface of (Will Mr White become the new

    Blofeld?!), and I imagine they'll keep that developing for at least two more films.

    However the action and everything else more than made up for any storytelling dissatisfaction and to be honest there's nothing that wrong with the storytelling — it just isn't as neat and tidy as Casino Royale's. Well worth watching.

  • D3ads
    • November 13, 2008 at 12:00 AM
    • #39

    Uhh...

    Quote

    Mr White was the guy they were interogating at the beginning wasn't he? I thought he got shot and killed in the gun fight that followed?

  • ctswin
    • November 13, 2008 at 1:52 AM
    • #40
    Quote from D3ads

    Uhh...

    Quote

    No, he escaped and then was last seen at the Opera

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. How to Use a Free Kundali Maker for Accurate Future Predictions

    astr09
    July 23, 2026 at 6:35 AM
  2. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  3. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  4. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  5. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  6. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  7. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  8. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  9. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  10. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™