My photo thread
-
-
You are circling things I didnt even add in photoshop
-
wow then it's a big fail on my side

but please give some insight on that background because it looks totally wrong on my computer o_O
-
The background was added in post processed (photoshop bscly) but some of the other things you circled were in the original image
I do see what you are talking about being a line on the end of the shadow but not even an entire photo class could notice it on my 16 x 20 print I had for critique. So naturally I wondered why you would think its that big of a deal
-
well I only "critizied" what i circled red and that seems to be all photoshop related stuff then (as you said the bg is pp.) it's not a big deal for a "fun" photography but imagine you are doing shots for some kind of pr-campaign you'd have to think about the background implantation and that's why im pointing it out here. it's nothing wrong with just pasting some background in but it really helps a lot if you think about exact layermasks or fill options (easy multiply or add + rough layermask would have done the job already). It's nitpicky to point it out maybe but I'd rather have a bunch of critics than a class full of people who don't see it at all.
-
More
http://flickr.com/photos/jeanpaultron/s ... 162996013/
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3134/317 ... dd0b_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1034/317 ... 58d3_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1347/317 ... 389a_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3084/317 ... c908_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1057/317 ... 2bf1_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3255/317 ... 64b2_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3099/317 ... 7a5f_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1086/317 ... b2da_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1033/317 ... b420_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3109/317 ... c3cc_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1057/317 ... 39db_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1130/317 ... a086_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3077/317 ... 8fb2_b.jpg
I hope you like them
-
Wow that was very inspirational!
-
More
from santa fe
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3529/318 ... b3f93c.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/318 ... 274ccb.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3326/318 ... a8f6_b.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/318 ... fdf7e4.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3459/318 ... 78c342.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3421/318 ... e7de7e.jpg
see the rest here
-
The 3rd and 6th shot are amazing! you really have a nice, and original style, keep posting your photos!

-
How is this for a portrait?

[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3407/3219304904_6cacc81cf5_o.jpg]
-
woha, interesting look. i like the DOF in there but the image composition is a bit confusing. He's on the left side of the pic and looking to the left so there's too much "wasted" (uninteresting) space on his right. Also I'd have gone further away for a half-total shot or closer to really only get the part above his armpit to avoid that high-contrast spot with the "white" background and the black shirt around it. Lighting is cool, no dropshadows, yet modelling the face very well. Don't know if you have a kicker set up in there - can't really see one, for the particular image I'd not even be sure if it'd work but might be something that can add additional depth. I like that you left alot of space above his head, really adds to the composition's proportions.
-
-
fantastic perspective - kinda looks like you photgraphed the photographers as your main subject
really cool. color gradient (or vignetting) helps the picture as well (dunno if it's intentionally). like 
-
So awesome!
I visit this thread from time to time for inspiration!

-
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3330/3307941842_875ebf5cbd_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3314/3307111355_49c78de782_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3585/3307941396_b18ee979c0_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3451/3307110839_4ed5763eeb_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3525/3307110601_c86b77dde1_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3380/3307940628_a048391bbb_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3501/3307110071_7721b19984_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3485/3307939900_5945b7871b_o.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3660/3307940144_5da245667e_o.jpg]
The color was kept in on purpose, it didnt look as awesome when it was perfectly white balanced. It took a while to get the right look for the first few, but I like how it turned out
-
[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3314/3307111355_49c78de782_o.jpg]
Wow, this one is my absolute favorite!, only thing that bothers me a little is that the sky is really empty and plain...
They all look amazing, nice environments, great lighting, great atmosphere!
Nothing to add except for one thing that caught my eye, in your first pic (the one with the ghost
) there is a lens flare in the bottom left corner, It doesn't really fit in with the photo IMO... -
great pics! what punky said: the sky looks a bit plain, no gradient, no texture.
-
Welcome to my town. 100% overcast most of the time

Oh and that lens flare wasnt added pp, it was in the original shot.
-
I really love the first one of the last batch and its atmosphere. Great work!
Quote from JeanPaulWelcome to my town. 100% overcast most of the time

Arf...
I think you could profit from that though. Are you into HDRi a little bit? Overcast skies are often freaking amazing, using a HDR treatment. They give to the shot a very strong atmosphere and by seeing your shot with this abandoned building, sure you could catch some breathtaking photos.
-
Well, for starters, HDR photography is an abomination. Its disgusting and over used. My opinion on this wont change unless the technology drastically changes or the photo community learns how to do it correctly (overdone ugliness) But even after that I am still not sold on what it does to images, its soft and the colors are ugly. And if I were to do HDR in these situations I would have been there triple the current long ass time I was there as HDR requires bracketing all your shots either 2, 3, or five exposures up and down. (not that bullshit single shot HDR you see everywhere (even though there are some companies that are close to cameras being able to shoot all single shots with the dynamic tonal range of a bracketed image)) And with how long some of these shots took to take, I didn't feel like doing that. Anywhoo...
My town's overcast is not a normal one, its a 'lake effect' overcast. Instead of cool cloud formations and awesome dark grey clouds or anything of the like, its a solid 50% grey gradient most of the time. No cloud shapes/formations or anything, just a low lying grey. (fucking shoot me now) so even with HDR, you still wont get anything from the sky.
Oh and my grandmother

[Blocked Image: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3630/3330552282_ac1398b71c_o.jpg]
-
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!