Fallout 3

No, our fallout 3 hating word is law

Actually, i pretty much enjoyed oblivion, I did all the quests and had some quite fun times. Maybe not as much as morrowind => http://kokosovar.free.fr/morrowind1.jpg , mostly because of the random based environment which kill all the fun of exploration, but fun nonetheless.

I like the elder-scrolls for what they are, but a fallout oriented elder-scroll is making me angryyyyy !!!!

Quote from Sentura

different blokes different strokes. just because you don't like it doesn't mean anybody else can't.

When the running\walking animations make you look like you moondance forwards, then you cannot call that nice. As a game critic, you should have an eye for that.

I'm not saying this cause it's FO3 by Beth, but because it looks like crap.

People who haven't tried the originals:

http://%7boption%7d

Quote from st0lve

People who haven't tried the originals:http://%7boption%7d

Nice extra content, just got fallout 1 =)

oh ps. all the money goes to interplay, and high sales would show them that people still love their old games

awesome, for that money I'm obviously buying it.

I'm not gonna play it right away tho, there's too much shit on my "to-play" list.

We sent them a cake

http://bethblog.com/

[Blocked Image: http://static.bethsoft.com/blog/Launch%20025.jpg]

Wow thats fucking awesome luka!

I'd so gonna buy such a cake

oh man, that's really nice of you guys! Nice cake indeed!

Edit:

GT review: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/42126.html

Quote from Pericolos0

i really don't get game reviewers. They are saying the game has a lot of flaws and glitches that would be really bad in other games, animations are bad and the characters look like static dolls, geometry is repetitive. Then they say but the game is really big so we can forgive all that! 9.4!!!!!!! Jesus christ.

I'll still be getting it later on because it's fallout though.

That's because they are getting paid to give it a good review.

Quote from kleinluka

We sent them a cake http://bethblog.com/

[Blocked Image: http://static.bethsoft.com/blog/Launch%20025.jpg]

Looks like a thing nma-fallout would do... only they would poison the cake before.

Quote from dux

That's because they are getting paid to give it a good review.

Is the game review world really that corrupt?

Just bought the game last night, played it for only about 2 hours though. So far, very well done, a lot of fun. I will agree, the lighting in this game is something to be desired, it's fairly lack luster. But overall... I'm excited to play again tonight. I just got a sawed off shotgun, which means I'll be planning on having a lot of fun tonight with the game.

That’s a nice looking cake

My copy got shipped out today so it should be with me tomorrow. I ordered the collectors edition so it comes in the big metal lunch box. I mostly want it for the making of and art book..... and the game I suppose.

Quote from Minotauro

Looks like a thing nma-fallout would do... only they would poison the cake before.

lol so true

the text would be "I hope you all get critical hit to the GROIN for 1032 pts of damage"

fucking brilliant thing with the cake, klein. i applaud you!

also, twiz: remember the kane&lynch scandal last year? i'd say there's a chance that the review world is corrupt.

Who really thinks that? I mean, come on, look at all these reviews. Anybody who seriously suggests all these are due to corrupt journalism needs their head screwed on. Ockham's Razor, people; maybe the simple explanation is that, I dunno, the game is actually really fuckin' good?

Also, 10/10 does not mean a game is perfect. Nobody rates things like that, else nothing would ever get that rating. People giving something 10/10, or 5/5, do so to say "right now this is the mutt's nuts, go buy it". Something can be flawed but still so awesome that it's a (or THE) standout example of a given genre.