GTA 6 (or whatever they end up naming it) is under development as confirmed by Rockstar
Quote Many of you have been asking about a new entry in the Grand Theft Auto series. With every new project, our goal is always to significantly move beyond what we've previously delivered. We're pleased to confirm that active development for the next entry in the series is underway.
Quote from leplubodeslapin10 hours ago, leplubodeslapin said: In case someone's interested in it, i wrote a page on my portfolio about my work on Deathloop :
Félicitations 
Do you still do engineering work on the side or is it now a long distant memory?
A recent promotional mural in Warsaw that mimics the changing dynamics of the game between day and night
[Blocked Image: https://i.redd.it/tmu6adx84ve81.jpg]
Mafia II 2010
Main Theme (Matúš Široký, Adam Kuruc)
Quote from will2kOn 1/10/2022 at 10:40 PM, will2k said:
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
It's out now and it looks like it's getting good steam user reviews
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1792250/Se…iberian_Mayhem/
A new Crysis also means a new CryEngine (v5.7 or probably 6.0) with potentially new gamesdk and assets to play with
Crysis 4 (Working Title) Announcement
The Polish prodigy virtuoso
Quote from Niller^.-On 1/18/2022 at 5:36 PM, Niller^.- said:
For the indoor shot, I would consider having a slight differentiation in lighting between the actual indoor lighting (ceiling fluorescent lamps or wall lamps) and the sunlight from the skylight. A play on yellow/white or light-orange/light-blue wouldn't go amiss instead of similar light tint for indoor and outdoor.
Quote from NikiOoOn 1/15/2022 at 12:09 PM, NikiOo said: http://# Reveal hidden contents [Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIvoGrAX0AAl0Te?format=jpg&name=4096x4096]
I bet if you set out to do it, you could make this scene photorealistic. Remove the fantasy scaffoldings, make the water less blue, reduce the bloom, replace the cartoon grass with grass thay looks like real grass, and undo the Instagram filter. They definitely weren't going for realistic here. And you can't make the excuse that the technology isn't there yet.
That's why I previously posted that it's up to the artist; mediocre assets and/or wrong parameters and the photorealism goes out the window.
In contrast, here's a scene in UE 4.27 with full ray tracing that's bordering on photorealistic (different artist)
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJElX-pWUAAVEps?format=jpg&name=4096x4096]
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJElYx2XwA0MW_A?format=jpg&name=4096x4096]
Looks like DL2 will get the DL1 treatment
Quote Want to know what will happen AFTER the premiere? We guarantee to expand the world of Dying Light 2 Stay Human for at least 5 years post launch with new stories, locations, in-game events and all the fun stuff you love!
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJFDfzuXMAotFSr?format=jpg&name=large]
Quote from FMPONE7 hours ago, FMPONE said: asset quality almost seems to differ in the shots, I find this whole rock set pretty unconvincing
It all depends on the artist and what asset quality/megascans they use. One artist could use medium quality meshes/materials or wrongly set up parameters, and the scene automatically looks artificial/phony. As with any engine/tools, Nanite/Lumen tech is there in UE5, it's how you use them.
Here's another batch of shots from another artist:
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FI_GLHEXIAY6c6M?format=png&name=4096x4096]
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FI_GLHIXsAoahY3?format=png&name=4096x4096]
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FI_GZmvWQAgd6ql?format=png&name=4096x4096]
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FI_GgT7XoAUwpHB?format=jpg&name=4096x4096]
[Blocked Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FI_GgUSXMAYPkcO?format=jpg&name=4096x4096]
