no surprise, but how the fuck is mattdamon a free username lol
Posts by Vilham
-
-
Very jelly, looks great.
-
Exactly the same liam, have yet to play it. Doubt I ever will. For me it's gone a very similar direction to CoD, after the piece of shit that was MW2 I haven't touched them.
-
Quote from Thrik
The deutsche welle is apparently the same thing france 24 is, and you too don't know about it, that's amazing

I didn't knew you could have a tv channel broadcasting what your country "thinks" on the international scene (like maybe it's not the opinion of the majority of the citizens in the country), it's paid with your taxes, and you didn't know about it. I'm blown away

That is weird. I'm aware that there's a global BBC entity (both channel and news site I think), yet we can't even access the website in the UK without proxies and the channel certainly isn't aired here. I remember stumbling upon it one day and it telling me I can't view it because it's not funded by the UK TV license system. It doesn't tend to come up in UK search results either. It feels like these things are set up specifically to speak for us without letting us have any idea what's being said...
BBC world service is paid for by licensing out shows/channels to foreign networks and selling box sets. Basically it has nothing to do with the state funded (which I'm not even sure you can classify the BBC as, the money never passes through the state, there is merely a law stating you must have a license if you own a TV, which the BBC has to argue they deserve over another channel every few years) BBC, it is its own entity.
-
Quote from Minos
Let's not forget other important state owned outlets: PBS, BBC, Deustche Welle and France 24.
RT's mission is to provide Russia's perspective on current affairs, this is on their frontpage if I'm not mistaken. To me, that's what makes it special. When something happens you can compare what CNN/FOX are reporting against RT and use a middle ground to paint a picture of reality. The truth usually stands in between two extremes.
I'll reserve my judgement for Putin's actions for later, but so far not a single person has been hurt as a direct result of his actions in Crimea and that's a fact.
The BBC is not state owned.
-
keep in mind that displacements won't effect vis and thus if you don't block behind them with no draw your performance will be shit.
-
Quote from D3adsDisplay More
Whilst I wont disagree on your point about communism, Soviet leaders did not however nearly wipe out an entire people in a direct campaign of genocide. The largest number of people killed in the USSR were under Stalin, an ethnic Georgian and out of those killed the majority were Russians.
When exactly was Russian law changed? The constitution allows for a president to serve a six year term which can be renewed once upon winning the election again. After this, the leader must step down and sit out from running for office in the next election. Putin was voted into office after Yeltsin during the elections in 2000. In the 2004 election he was voted in for a second term. In 2008 he stepped down and was not allowed to run for office. Medvedev won the elections instead and was president for a six year term appointing Putin as PM. In 2012, since he was able to run again, he ran for a new term and won.
Sure, those elections were deemed as being unfair and corrupt (most of it coming from claims of the OCSE, known for being anti-Russian). If Putin was/is a "dictator", he'd just change the constitution to make him president for life and hold mock elections where the results would be 90% + (like the faux elections by Saddam and Bashar al-Assad) as it is, in the latest election even with the alleged fraudulent votes ommited, would still result in victory. Putin is very popular in Russia and the majority of those who are against him are those from the Communist Party and those who dislike him for not being Nationalist enough (they would like him to be more firm on the West and not have so many relations with the EU/US). It's worth noting that his popularity at the moment is extremely high because of Sochi, the gay Propaganda bill (around 85% of the population supports that) and now the invasion of Crimea to protect Russia's interests. That can change though obviously, if the situation in Ukraine escalates and Russians start dying in an actual war...
On the other points:
- On imprisoning political rivals: ...like who exactly? How many political rivals does Putin actually have? Navalny? Pussy Riot?!!
- Separatist movements? Chechnya? Read what I said in the post above. The only people interested in Chechen independence are fanatics and terrorists, vast majority of Chechens are happy under Kadyrov under his own islamic leadership.
- Pretty much only state media? There are nearly 100,000 media outlets in Russia, 10 of which are state owned... yeah that's really "pretty much only state media" clearly...
Ultimately I've made it clear I'm no supporter of Russia's actions in Crimea, I understand their position but invasion of a neighbour is not the way to go about it. We will have to just wait and see what happens here...
"The constitution allows for a president to serve a six year term " changed under Medvedev (quite blatently under Putins orders, he couldn't have done it during his own term that would have been a tad too obvious) to allow Putin to serve another 12 years, guess what will happen then, he will sit down for a term, allow one of his cronies to be president and its a sure bet that Putin will be back for another 12 years. Definitely democracy.
" Separatist movements? Chechnya? Read what I said in the post above. The only people interested in Chechen independence are fanatics and terrorists, vast majority of Chechens are happy under Kadyrov under his own islamic leadership." Yeah, Putin enacted a law that makes secessionist demands a crime, punishable by 3 years in jail and 5 years if done through any form of media. Totally not a dictator.
"Pretty much only state media? There are nearly 100,000 media outlets in Russia, 10 of which are state owned... yeah that's really "pretty much only state media" clearly..." As Friechamp said, literally every single one of the largest media outlets are owned by the state (run by Putin), Putin or his friends.
"On imprisoning political rivals: ...like who exactly? How many political rivals does Putin actually have? Navalny? Pussy Riot?!!" http://www.khodorkovsky.com/memorials-full…ners-in-russia/ Locking up business and political rivals is pretty much what Russia is world known for doing.
That you think Russia is a country to be admired stuns me.
-
Quote from ESToomere
Kinda completely not. Both of those (although in the case of Iraq it was via falsified documents) had broad support across the world. Both were carried out by international coalitions.
Depends on where you're looking at it.
I find the western world largely biased towards the US.
Russia has been the "great evil" before sliced bread, difference with the US being that they don't give a fuck and MOSTLY don't hide it.
No it really doesn't, it wasn't only the western world that oked afgan and iraq.
Russia was the great evil. The communist murdered more people than Hitler for fucks sake.
Russia is a "democracy" that has had its law changed to let the same guy run for the same office beyond what was legally allowed and used a clause to blatently side step the entire principle of democracy, that imprisons political rivals, that has pretty much only state run media, that despite having its own separatist movements that are killed by the Russian state and who quite clearly doesn't give a damn about self determination hypocritically invades another country to "protect the rights of Russian speaking citizens and self determination" when no one has even died and aren't under any current threat of being repressed.
I mean seriously... I know the world isn't black and white, that western countries carry out some pretty fucked up stuff. But it pales in comparison to how Russia would rule the world if it was a dominate super power.
-
-
Yeah the new version is definitely better, Its a bit too snipy atm, needs some more cover and doglegs or atleast visibility blocking from certain angles.
-
These HBO miniseries are generally pretty good. They can actually have a good plot as there is a clear end.
-
yup, not going to happen. Definitely calling their bluff.
-
same, willjosephy.com

-
This is almost exactly how I feel about the game: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-02-25-banished-review
-
More homes man, atleast 1 house per 2 adults if not 1 house per adult.
-
not sure if rzl is the one sorting the playtest tonight as he hasn't read my message with the map, so im gunna post it here:
-
lots of people are impatient. I would honestly think that is the main reason.
-
Got 170 people now, passed up on 29 nomads as I didn't think I would be able to support them at the moment. Need to expand some more resource posts for food and wood with some houses first.
-
Quote from Minos
This is a city builder, just like Sim City where the goal is just to build. I don't remember ever playing those scenarios in Sim City
I wouldn't worry about that in the long run, they are going to add mod support soon and I expect the community to make some really crazy modes. Hoping they get steamworks support for that.I've been struggling to have more than 130 people in my towns. I can never get enough firewood, and every 10 years or so famine suddenly strikes and half my population is gone. I even had a tornado right after I controlled a famine which reduced my town to 20 people or so lol
Pogos, how are you dealing with food and materials when you expand? Everytime I expanded too fast that bit me in the ass later on... I can never get enough firewood, even though I upgraded most of the houses to stone. I guess the problem is that I don't have a market in the city's center.
This has far more in common with Pharaoh than sim city. Pharaoh or Caesar both had campaigns that were great and made each mission enjoyable and challenging.
Quote from MinosSeems like the woodcutters never cut firewood fast enough. But that could be because people in my town generally have to walk quite a bit to get to the nearest stockpile, and since the woodcutters can't cope with demand they never have any stock. That causes people to be always picking small quantities instead of stashing their homes with firewood for long periods of time. I guess a market would fix that problem but I have no space for it
.By the way, a nice trick is to get hunters cabins as early as possible, they provide leather which a tailor can use to make clothes which have a really high price when trading. (You are going to need a lot of those to acquire your first seeds/livestock on hard)
Anyways, restarting again and let's see how far I can take this new one

I have 144 people at the moment and 3 woodcutters, 2 markets provide for my town. Never seem to have a shortage, infact cut wood is one of my main exports with tools and clothes. Half my houses are stone half are wood.
-
Quote from KoKo5oVaR
What worries me a bit is the repetitiveness, maybe the guy will add more stuff ? i mean in pharaoh for example, you had scenarios where the resources were limited, the setting for arable grounds, rivers, cliffs etc weren't the same, and you had objectives for the scenario like growing a city of 3000 people, sell a certain quantity of manufactured products, or build motherfucking pyramids.
Cause it's fun to learn the mechanics of a city builder, but once you know them it's like playing an FPS on the same map over and over, it's gets pretty repetitive if you don't have any scenarios to adapt your knowledge to.
Still that's looks super good and i will buy it anyway

Yeah all these indie games are basically ignoring campaigns and scenarios in favour of just sandbox, for me sandbox is only satisfying for so long. I much prefer a campaign or scenarios where there are certain conditions and each game takes a couple hours.