[Blocked Image: http://i40.tinypic.com/fog1lf.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i40.tinypic.com/20qe2z7.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i39.tinypic.com/dom8hw.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i44.tinypic.com/b9jbzt.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i41.tinypic.com/2sadzz4.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i39.tinypic.com/2ih6kao.jpg]
Thanks for the cc dude. I agree with what you said and I debated for a while whether or not to post some of the worse images of the set, but I figured I could get more crits on those regarding shooting options like f/stops and ISO speed.
The last image was shot in a session along with about 1,3GB of photos and was the only one I even converted from RAW off the camera.
I'll keep that shit in mind.
Pretty recently I got to try out my dad's Nikon D200 and have been experimenting with it.
Still learning how to use most of the features on it, so any criticism is welcome 
[Blocked Image: http://s5.tinypic.com/2ni8fte.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i42.tinypic.com/2z56m2s.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i42.tinypic.com/10s63go.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i44.tinypic.com/f23pt5.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i42.tinypic.com/2dvstig.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i40.tinypic.com/mc7wb5.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i40.tinypic.com/35hei2w.jpg]
[Blocked Image: http://i39.tinypic.com/6dsjz8.jpg]
Quote from JeanPaulThen you are the guys that think having un-edited images as final products is okay, I guess not everyone can be a photographer
Such arrogance 
Not trying to flame or anything, just feel that sort of stuff needs to be called out.
Just because you've posted some cool photos doesn't really give you the right to judge what makes people photographers. Art is in the eye of the beholder and any attempt of convincing people otherwise is an act of snobbery.
Anyway, I looked at all the photos in this thread and I really like them, though I do agree with previous posters about putting more sky into the vertical ones.
I think blaming the platform for bad stability is jumping to conclusions, they're different developers, different routines and procedures, and above all... different standards.
I have no doubt that fallout 3 will be well "ported" to the PC, but the point I'm making is that it shouldn't have to be "ported" to begin with. Bugs or stability isn't my concern either... my concern is that so many facets of the game seem to be optimized/centered around both the console as a platform, and as a demographic. Case in point; the slow-motion scenes... obviously aimed at the kind of person who has an xbox and all the halo games and thinks teabagging is funny. Sure, it'll be cool the first three or four times... but seriously... every single time I critically hit?
Am I the only one seriously bothered/concerned with the fact that the devs act like they're only making it for consoles?
Every single demo/preview is done on a 360 and all the interfaces seem engineered towards consoles in general, I know 360s are easier to bring to conventions and stuff, but all the online previews and in-house videos are clearly being controlled with something other than a mouse.
The only thing that really jumps out at me is the tiled water outside... increase the scale or make your own water 
Man, I would love to contribute some custom content once this is released.
Any plans for a level editor or is it all models?
Quote from DvSThis goes inside the LightmappedGeneric bracket.
"LightmappedGeneric_DX9_hdr"
{
"$envmaptint" "[x x x]"
}This goes inside the LightmappedGeneric bracket.
[Blocked Image: http://www.wickedlasers.com/images/products/secondary/136.jpg]
Why? I'm not sure...
who wouldn't want a GREEN laser? 
Quote from JeanPauluse crysis for dat
But it's not an island! 
Looks good, but you could easily optimize the UV better simply by moving the top triangle thing down to the space below it.
Also, it would look a lot better with a reflection property. Make it shiny
EDIT: I can see now that they are indeed reflective, but it really isn't obvious. Perhaps make the windows slightly darker to make the reflection easier to make out?
Must be hard, modeling unknown territory 
Looks great though.
Icelandic (Björk/Sigur Rós) but not quite their style.
I like it, the warning stripes look a bit overused in the last shot though, and the sharpen filter sort of hurts too look at.
Quote from st0lveI don't understand VATS at all. Looks like it's a super powered turnbased system... Kinda weird. I didn't see any actionpoints placed, maybe the low res did all of that. And isn't it possible to miss? Hell with 15% he still hits and blows the hell out of anything in sight.
It's a demo, they're not going to make it possible to miss in the demo since obviously you want to see him kill shit, not miss.
Quote from st0lveTo me, it did kinda look like a generic shooter, if you are skilled, I don't see the point of using VATS, since you'll probably be able to do it quicker in your own way. I would have loved to see some of the dialogue, and them showing off examples where your speech skills actually had something to say (1 char., 1 int. + lowest speech in FO
).
I don't think skill will matter much. Probably the game will just select a VATS hit location when you aim yourself but it will still have the same chance to hit/miss.
Speech gameplay is prone to revealing plot etc so they'll probably hold off on that.
Consolitis
If halo players and all they stand for could be consolidated into a single person, I'd like to kill that person 
