Low DX9 looks like FarCry 
The lowest one is ugly, looks like an unlighted Source level . Just hope I won't have to use that one. The extreme one I guess is just to impress people 
sweet jesus @ DX10 one, so many subtleties there that just pull the whole picture together. i love the rays of light going through the trees and the way the rocks really "pop", or maybe that's because they're actually models there? 
Quote from MrH2o"Also note that the beta includes an Extreme option that is greyed out as no commercially available hardware can produce the settings at a satisfactory frame rate."
ah ah ah ah !
How did they tested this then? WIth a super computer? 
I'm kinda bummed that a game is already out that will rape my relatively new comp.
":b1q0497q]
ah ah ah ah !
How did they tested this then? WIth a super computer?
render it, just like anything else.also, parallax mapping: wooooow.
":qix8jdm7]
ah ah ah ah !
How did they tested this then? WIth a super computer?
Whats your spec Mr HP
Aye, I think High DX9 is fine for me. I'm not using Vista on my work machine, and I'm not quite sure if I'm gonna bother getting a new computer for this.
Oh and Low looks way worse than FarCry imo, lighting is unbelievably terrible.
Quote from Algorsweet jesus @ DX10 one, so many subtleties there that just pull the whole picture together. i love the rays of light going through the trees and the way the rocks really "pop", or maybe that's because they're actually models there?
The small rocks/pebbles aren't models, it's a texture that makes use of the parallax mapping 
Quote from MrH2oah ah ah ah !
How did they tested this then? WIth a super computer?
Whats your spec Mr HP
x800XT
2gb ram
AMD dual core, 4600+
This baby looks so awesome on High detail!
Christ, even Far Cry looks better than the lowest setting 
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
