It's 2006 and we still don't have [insert your request here]

Quote from Cybbe

lol. Bst dk nkm qt evr

qft

My guess is that since the father of all good games has left blizz, they are afraid to make a sequel (because it'll probably suck), so they just milk WoW instead, will do for the next decade. Which is fine by me.

Quote from FMPONE

I can't speak for the engine as a whole, but in Gears of War the levels load ridiculously fast for how good they look, and it makes playing the game much more addicting.

yeah it does load rather quickly but I'm not a fan of the LODs in GoW, too often I see the switch rather blatantly in front of me. (I dont own it I was playin on vivi's)

Its a great game though..

stalker chadow of chernobyl

We still don't have Fallout3: Van Buren or that Troika game.

Quote from st0lve

We still don't have Fallout3: Van Buren or that Troika game.

also we don't have Fallout Online which would be the ultimate game.

They are unlikely to reach any higher quality than in the original SCBW anyways. But still I think they should give it a try.

Quote from Skjalg

My guess is that since the father of all good games has left blizz, they are afraid to make a sequel (because it'll probably suck), so they just milk WoW instead, will do for the next decade. Which is fine by me.

ummm and who might that be ?

Well several has left to create Flagship, Castaway, Arenanet, Red 5, etc.

... and we still haven't got an internet connection.

no wait.. thats just me.

Quote from JAL

also we don't have Fallout Online which would be the ultimate game.

But; Fool was never even announced by Interplay until like 2 weeks ago. Yes, by Interplay. But I doubt that it will be popular, since most Fallout followers want all FO games to be turnbased.http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=33688

2006 and still have no real girlfriends