1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Vault
  3. Archived Forums
  4. Political Discussion

In war its interrogation, not torture you dumb U.N.!

  • mawibse
  • February 14, 2006 at 3:03 PM
  • mawibse
    • February 14, 2006 at 3:03 PM
    • #1

    A U.N. investigation has concluded that the United States committed acts amounting to torture at Guantanamo Bay.

    American officials said the most significant flaw of the report was that it judged U.S. treatment of detainees according to peacetime human rights laws. The United States contends it is in a state of conflict and should be judged according to the laws of war.

    So torture is not torture when in a war?

    http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/02/13/un ... index.html

  • st0lve
    • February 14, 2006 at 3:14 PM
    • #2

    Its torture no matter what situation.

  • The Postman
    • February 14, 2006 at 5:03 PM
    • #3

    It's torture no matter what. Cut the damned doublespeak out, Mawibse.

    Come on, what you're saying is tantamount to shouting "WHY DON'T YOU LOVE AMERICA?" in response to a valid accusation.

  • mawibse
    • February 14, 2006 at 5:42 PM
    • #4

    Perhaps the word torture is a bit misleading, we are talking about sleep deprivation, prolonged solitary confinement and force feeding of starvers, common "stress and duress" techniques. Not pulling fingernails or electric shocks!

    Also the U.N investigators has not even been to Guantanamo Bay, despite being invited.

    And The Postman, it's the validity of the accusations i'm discussing, not some persons lack of love for the biggest upholder of democratic values in the universe.

  • Fletch
    • February 14, 2006 at 6:13 PM
    • #5
    Quote from mawibse

    Perhaps the word torture is a bit misleading, we are talking about sleep deprivation, prolonged solitary confinement and force feeding of starvers, common "stress and duress" techniques. Not pulling fingernails or electric shocks!

    Yeah, don't forget the getting naked and piling up in human pyramids, having bags taped over your head as people take pictures to send home to loved ones Good thing they were being interrogated.

  • mawibse
    • February 14, 2006 at 6:33 PM
    • #6

    That was wrong.

    But I was refering to Guantanamo Bay, not an incident in war zone where the guards got out of hand, whom has been punished for their actions btw.

  • RD
    • February 14, 2006 at 6:41 PM
    • #7

    Id rather have my nails pulled out than my mind dying of white noise and sleep deprivation

  • The Postman
    • February 14, 2006 at 7:17 PM
    • #8
    Quote from Fletch

    Yeah, don't forget the getting naked and piling up in human pyramids, having bags taped over your head as people take pictures to send home to loved ones Good thing they were being interrogated.

    Or being put into sleeping bags and subjected to extreme heat after a massive beating.

    We don't torture though, nuh uh. Really. Serious here.

    Quote from mawibse

    That was wrong.But I was refering to Guantanamo Bay, not an incident in war zone where the guards got out of hand, whom has been punished for their actions btw.

    I'm sure it's just a few bad apples, and not supported, documented procedure. :

  • Lurker
    • February 14, 2006 at 7:55 PM
    • #9

    Question for mawibse:

    Have you been to Gitmo Bay?

    What makes statements made by your opposition conjecture and your's true?

    By the way, I'd like you to produce a credible source to back up your statement about the investigators being invited to Gitmo Bay and given access to the materials they needed. As far as I know of, no UN or human rights group has been allowed inside of the camp to do the necessary work to uncover the truth.

    Note: a source other than the one used in the CNN article, ie. someone not biased towards their own cause (Richard Grenell).

    I find it really sad that the government is attacking those who are looking out for the wellbeing of fellow human beings. Another example of the US government supporting a group when they support their position and casting them aside as crazies when they don't.

  • mawibse
    • February 14, 2006 at 9:27 PM
    • #10
    Quote from Lurker

    Have you been to Gitmo Bay?

    No, but its like a large prison run by millitaries.

    Is there something specific you want to know about it?

    Quote from Lurker

    What makes statements made by your opposition conjecture and your's true?

    Lets not get philosophical in this thread shall we.

    Quote from Lurker

    I'd like you to produce a credible source to back up your statement about the investigators being invited to Gitmo Bay

    http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.a ... 26&sid=WOR

    http://www.politicalcortex.com/story/20 ... 135746/024

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/n ... tmo01.html

    Quote from RD

    Id rather have my nails pulled out than my mind dying of white noise and sleep deprivation

    Well that sounds really tough n all but... I dont believe it for a second.

    Quote from Lurker

    Another example of the US government supporting a group when they support their position and casting them aside as crazies when they don't.

    Hmmm Wasn't there a really big smear campaign in the US of a UN weapon inspector prior to the Iraq invasion?

    Quote from The Postman

    I'm sure it's just a few bad apples, and not supported, documented procedure.

    So am I.

  • Lurker
    • February 14, 2006 at 9:43 PM
    • #11

    Ah, I just wanted to know what made you so sure you were right. Not so sure what makes your opinion more credible than the others voiced in this thread...?

  • RD
    • February 14, 2006 at 9:49 PM
    • #12
    Quote from mawibse

    Well that sounds really tough n all but... I dont believe it for a second.

    Ok maybe not, but those psychological tricks are just a little step down the ladder of horror

  • mawibse
    • February 14, 2006 at 10:05 PM
    • #13
    Quote from Lurker

    Not so sure what makes your opinion more credible than the others voiced in this thread...?

    It's not more credible, its an opinion, opinions are not meassured on credibility alone but mostly if and why you do or do not share them.

    Quote from RD

    but those psychological tricks are just a little step down the ladder of horror

    True, but like you said, they are a step down.

    And in a war you certainly take a few steps up that ladder.

  • The Postman
    • February 14, 2006 at 11:13 PM
    • #14

    Mawibse, what would it take for you to admit that we torture people? We have documented videos of prisoner beatings, accounts of "renditioning" ( :roll: ) techniques that have killed prisoners, literally hundreds of photos from Abu Grahib and Gitmo, accusations by the EU of CIA run secret prisons in Poland (the irony of the placement is not lost on me). What does it take? The president admitting personally "We torture people, what are you gonna do about it? Ha!" I get the feeling then you'd simply justify it.

  • Scraps
    • February 14, 2006 at 11:16 PM
    • #15
    Quote from mawibse

    A U.N. investigation has concluded that the United States committed acts amounting to torture at Guantanamo Bay.American officials said the most significant flaw of the report was that it judged U.S. treatment of detainees according to peacetime human rights laws. The United States contends it is in a state of conflict and should be judged according to the laws of war.

    So torture is not torture when in a war?

    http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/02/13/un ... index.html

    If we're in a war, how come they aren't accorded POW rights?

  • The Postman
    • February 14, 2006 at 11:18 PM
    • #16
    Quote from Scraps

    If we're in a war, how come they aren't accorded POW rights?

    Because we have an Att. Gen. that referred to the Geneva Conventions as "quaint."

    Quote

    Gonzales authored a controversial memo in January of 2002 that explored whether Article III of the Geneva Convention even applied to Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters captured in Afghanistan and held in concentration facilities around the world, including Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The memo made several arguments both for and against providing Article III protection to Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters. He concluded that Article III was outdated and ill-suited for dealing with captured Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters. He described as "quaint" the provisions that require providing captured Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters "commissary privileges, scrip, athletic uniforms, and scientific instruments". He also argued that existing military regulations and instructions from the President were more than adequate to ensure that the principles of the Geneva Convention would be applied. He also argued that undefined language in the Geneva Convention, such as "outrages upon personal dignity" and "inhuman treatment", could make officials and military leaders subject to the War Crimes Act of 1996 if mistreatment was discovered.

  • Scraps
    • February 14, 2006 at 11:20 PM
    • #17
    Quote from The Postman

    Because we have an Att. Gen. that referred to the Geneva Conventions as "quaint."

    Holy crap, that sounds like an answer to a relevant question. Are you sure that was Gonzales saying that? You must have caught him on the third week of the third month of a leap year because for as far as I know, he doesn't answer relevant questions.

  • Lurker
    • February 14, 2006 at 11:57 PM
    • #18
    Quote from Scraps

    If we're in a war, how come they aren't accorded POW rights?

    Technically, it's not a war, except everyone including Congress and the President calls it a war. So it isn't a war, but it is? See?

    Yeah, I was and am just as confused.

    As far as I'm concerned, this is a classic tale of treating your enemies with the respect you would want your own people to be treated by your enemy iif they happened to be captured. Seriously, POWs and those kidnapped in iIraq et al are just as deserving to life as everyone else, but I find it hard to give out sympathy to those policy-makers who deem it necessary to add fine print the legislation so they have a loophole big enough to torture people without consequence.

    For being such Christian people, I fail to see why the White House still harbours not a good bone in their collective body.

  • mawibse
    • February 15, 2006 at 8:49 AM
    • #19
    Quote from Lurker

    Mawibse, what would it take for you to admit that we torture people?

    Nothing, if you think that sleep deprivation is torture then fine, then we torture.

    But I'd like to point out that sleep deprivation is a long step from pulling fingernails and electro treatment to testicles, at least in my book.

    Quote from Scraps

    If we're in a war, how come they aren't accorded POW rights?

    POW's are accorded POW's rights, but those in Guantanamo is not because they broke the laws of war; like using civilians as shields, wearing civilian clothes and not a unified uniform, using not allowed tactics such as pretending to be medical staff and such. You know, basic Geneva stuff.

    Quote from Lurker

    Technically, it's not a war

    Because?

    Quote from Lurker

    As far as I'm concerned, this is a classic tale of treating your enemies with the respect you would want your own people to be treated by your enemy iif they happened to be captured.

    War isn't as noble as you think it is. You KILL your enemies.

    When someone KILLS your friends its damn hard to having respect towards those who did it. Especially when they constantly break the Geneva conventions, cut their captured prisoners heads off and knowingly targets civilians.

    Quote from Lurker

    I find it hard to give out sympathy to those policy-makers who deem it necessary to add fine print the legislation so they have a loophole big enough to torture people without consequence.

    I agree that there shouldn't be any changes in legislations for such, if you need to step outside the conventional interrogation methods there should be possible consequences enough so you don't do it to often.

  • RD
    • February 15, 2006 at 5:45 PM
    • #20
    Quote from mawibse

    Nothing, if you think that sleep deprivation is torture then fine, then we torture.

    But I'd like to point out that sleep deprivation is a long step from pulling fingernails and electro treatment to testicles, at least in my book.

    Sleep deprivation AKA unlimited solitary confinement in rooms filled with strobing lights and white noise, naked, exposed to extreme heat and cold and chained in positions that are designed to cause maximum stress on the muscles . After 5 minutes you will wish they pulled your nails out. The only step down the ladder is there are no visible scars

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  2. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  3. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  4. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Thrik
    June 20, 2026 at 10:11 PM
  5. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  6. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  7. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  8. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  9. Classic Maps Reborn For CS2

    SillySpaceCat
    May 31, 2026 at 10:33 PM
  10. [CS2] Dvina

    Pulbusha
    May 29, 2026 at 5:54 PM
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™