Hidden & Dangerous 3 (or remake) by anyone!
A new WWII game with the feeling of Day Of Defeat, the Size of Battlefield and alot of diff maps and units
Hidden & Dangerous 3 (or remake) by anyone!
A new WWII game with the feeling of Day Of Defeat, the Size of Battlefield and alot of diff maps and units
Warhammer 40k skinned over Bad Company 2. Would be so goooood!
I'd love a World War I game with high production values. Shite guns, mustard gas and horses with gas masks! Fuck yeah!
Or 3rd person action game based on the Napoleonic Wars.
Half-Life 1 for the iPod (any iOs remake). Could use UDK.
An anniversary version of tomb raider 2 and 3 ![]()
Quote from ChimerayDisplay MoreSingle player - co-op with a bit of endgame MMO influence, special abilitiesThis is a long shot, but I usually don't like MMO's for a variety of reasons. Anyhow, perhaps I'd like it if it was something like this:
Starts of as a single player (or make that co-op?) experience like a decent RPG has that gradually turns into an engame MMO in which the setting is modern/futuristic like with special abilities.
The beginning has a nice opening, you might not even have special abilities at first. Also, not superman stuff... Something like the tv series "Heroes" but more subtle like in the movie "Push".
Not "you've been spawned into an ugly open world, go kill some rats". After the single player kind of experience where you've been introduced to the game and after a decent finale, the game starts to open up into endgame MMO. You're basically skipping the first big shitty half MMO's have. The environment should be immersive, believable. A city, scientific facilities, whatever. First normal, then stuff goes wrong, environment changes...?
Of decent single player RPG quality. Not, here's a plane... We put some shit onto it. The majority of players is apparantly ok with that nowadays, but all new MMO's suffer from it, there's no immersion at all.
So yeah, basically... the beginning puts you into the game in a nice way, it's awsome. You don't want to grind to get amazing gear or whatever, no rush. You're just playing the game! Gradually when you know what's going on you're getting abilities and by the end of it, you're thrown into the MMO aspect of the game.
In the MMO engame part there's instances, battlefields and the storyline continues with big battles.
So the whole beginning of your everyday MMO is bypassed and has decent storytelling. No grind, no shitty beginner quests. Just a nice single player experience and you use the character you developed in the MMO engame and it's all about having fun with friends and teamplay. See it like a prolonged single player game.
I'm not even sure I would like it, very experimental... Perhaps I would, I honestly don't know.
Or perhaps I just don't like MMO's as a whole?
Not as much of a long shot as you might think.
Quote from DarkWarhammer 40k skinned over Bad Company 2. Would be so goooood!
Something like this?
Quote from SereniusSomething like this?
I'm looking forward to this, but its an mmo, and I would love to just see many games skinned over top of BC2. The gameplay/destruction is perfect for so many themes. Warhammer would just be perfect in medium to small sized maps like BC2 has. Plus I highly doubt anyone other than dice could have such a good engine to use for it ![]()
but bc2 isn't fun ![]()
i played BC2 for the first time today but i rage quit after getting owned by snipers
Someone, somewhere, anywhere: Take up the mantle of Dark Messiah of Might and Magic. I haven't seen a single game do what Dark Messiah did with combat, melee, and feeling like you're actually IN a world since then. Arkane was supposedly keeping those ideas going with their next game, but then that got all unfortunate n shit
I'd personally like to see another Heretic and Hexen released. Id software seems to be slacking. Doom 3 was ok, but I expected a Heretic 3 and Hexen 3 as well to follow with the old times.
Quote from OrpheusI hate to point this out but since when does millions of people playing something equate to "Fun"?
LOL, really? I'm not going to answer this. Especially since this game is not new anymore. My point is, that a game as successful in multiplayer since 1942, people love Battlefield period.
Lets just assume its to pass the time then ![]()
Quote from Minotauroi played BC2 for the first time today but i rage quit after getting owned by snipers
Come play with Dark and I instead =P.
Quote from DarkLOL, really? I'm not going to answer this.
It wasn't argument inducing. It was conversationally based. Millions play with their food daily. That's not fun. Millions used to think it was acceptable to play with little kids ... I don't think the kids thought it was very fun.
My point however is, how do millions of people doing something necessarily equate to something? If I were gonna prove a point that a given game is fun, I'd NEVER use other people's opinion to win my argument. I'd win it all by myself or not attempt to convince anyone otherwise.
Quote from OrpheusIt wasn't argument inducing. It was conversationally based. Millions play with their food daily. That's not fun. Millions used to think it was acceptable to play with little kids ... I don't think the kids thought it was very fun.
My point however is, how do millions of people doing something necessarily equate to something? If I were gonna prove a point that a given game is fun, I'd NEVER use other people's opinion to win my argument. I'd win it all by myself or not attempt to convince anyone otherwise.
And you have a degree in all of these facts? And guess what, Battlefield is fun. I win ![]()
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!