1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

Valve creates micro-transaction steam support

  • arhurt
  • September 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM
  • Taylor
    • October 24, 2010 at 10:18 AM
    • #61

    Agreed, every game needs shameless monetisation.

  • Campaignjunkie
    • October 24, 2010 at 5:33 PM
    • #62

    Well there's certainly no point in shameful monetization.

  • twiz
    • October 24, 2010 at 6:51 PM
    • #63

    haha seriously? You're against a way for the mod community & budding developers to make a little cash along the way?

    For stuff like map retextures or skins or shit like that, it would be client side only. Same with any 'custom' sounds. If you didn't want any thing but regular old TF2, no hats, no retextures, no whatever, you should be able to have that, for sure. But not allowing people who want to spend money on custom stuff just because it's "shameless monetization"?

    I don't see the problem with a TF2 player wanting a hat/new fountain/giant purple dildo instead of the wrench, being willing to pay a couple bucks for it, and a modder actually receiving a portion of that couple bucks for spending a few hours modeling a giant fucking purple dildo. Maybe three, the animations can be tricky on those.

  • Skjalg
    • October 25, 2010 at 10:02 AM
    • #64

    Why should games be different than how the rest of the world operates?

    If you buy a car and want to pimp it with a omgwtfbbq stereo, why shouldn't you be allowed? Is that shameful monetization as well by the evil car-manufacturor that allows you to pimp your ride? Or are they smart to allow the owner of the car to do excactly that?

    or even a simpler example. Is pimping yourself with a new hat that costs 20$ any different than pimping your ingame avatar with a hat?

    If you're one of those that never goes out then your ingame hat probably gets seen more by more people, so its probably a better investment Unless ofcourse you live in a country where a hat is necessary for survival

  • Taylor
    • October 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM
    • #65

    Car stereos are usually not a cosmetic change, and different models are usually not handed out free or by lottery depending by different manufacturers. Err, I can't use this metaphor.

    But, I was being serious anyway. Totally serious. I like the concept of buying a game and then offered functionally valueless assets for additional money or to circumvent a badly designed and/or rigged random drop systems. The idea of buying a game then paying £17.50 on a crocodile hat fills me with nothing but excitement, and the idea this could be taken to its logical conclusion and extrapolated to every single aspect of the game even more so.

    Hopefully in the future they can give me a credit card gun, and I can just go around clicking on every single asset in the game and charge myself sums of money for my own ‘personalised’ ‘experience.’ And if this could be done in an exploitive way that fuels buying on impulse, jealousy and peer pressure then even better! In fact I’d like every game to forgo aesthetic sensibilities, consistency and possibly even its own art direction; in favour of a player brought mish-mash of gimmicky crap.

  • Buddy
    • October 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM
    • #66

    I can't tell who's sarcastic and who's not atm.

  • -HP-
    • October 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM
    • #67
    Quote from Buddy

    I can't tell who's sarcastic and who's not atm.

  • twiz
    • October 25, 2010 at 3:09 PM
    • #68

    [Blocked Image: http://forums.mapcore.net/download/file.php?avatar=1286_1279841782.jpg]

    Just want to say, Taylor, that I agree with you in that I think anyone who spends real money on a fuckin virtual hat is an idiot. I would never do such a thing. The only DLC I've ever paid for was a couple extra songs for rock band a few years ago, and that's actually functional content, not virtual Barbie.

    But the fact is... people are idiots. staggering numbers of them are complete morons. You probably know some, cough-d3-cough.

    Also, these idiots have money. Who knows how they got it, but they did. Probably a drooling contest or something. We, the modding community(which I am completely not a part of besides hanging around here), have the opportunity to benefit from this! And why shouldn't we?

    One thing to note, is this is nothing different from all the other DLC systems out there, except that modders can make money from it. so its either:

    big producers make big money selling hats to fools.

    big producers make big money selling hats to fools, and some modders get some scraps thrown their way too.

    Take your pick. DLC ain't going anywhere, not with that kind of cash flow.

    (I hope I didn't offend any hat-owners in here :derp: )

  • Duff-e
    • October 25, 2010 at 3:50 PM
    • #69

    I don't know about idiots so much as have disposable income or are under 18 and get all their money from their parents.

    People buy expensive shit all the time that has 0 utility, in fact sometimes the less utility it has the more expensive it is.

    If you're going to play the game then the goal is to be at the receiving end of transactions with these willingly ignorant people not to sit on the sidelines in your tattered rags preaching about fiscal responsibility.

  • Defrag
    • October 25, 2010 at 10:58 PM
    • #70
    Quote

    Hopefully in the future they can give me a credit card gun, and I can just go around clicking on every single asset in the game and charge myself sums of money for my own ‘personalised’ ‘experience.’ And if this could be done in an exploitive way that fuels buying on impulse, jealousy and peer pressure then even better! In fact I’d like every game to forgo aesthetic sensibilities, consistency and possibly even its own art direction; in favour of a player brought mish-mash of gimmicky crap.

    lollin'

  • Skjalg
    • October 26, 2010 at 8:44 AM
    • #71

    I think people should be allowed to do stuff that they think are fun as long as it doesnt hurt other people. Buying a purple hat for your TF2 character doesn't hurt anyone. And I wouldn't really go so far as to call them stupid just because they are doing what they think is funny.

    Stupid is loathing people that knows how to have a good time

  • Taylor
    • October 26, 2010 at 9:12 AM
    • #72

    Burned

  • 2d-chris
    • October 26, 2010 at 9:38 AM
    • #73

    i dunno, back in the day all this shit was a free downloadable skin replacement from websites, dildo knifes and other fun items paying for it is nuts

  • twiz
    • October 26, 2010 at 12:21 PM
    • #74
    Quote from Skjalg

    Stupid is loathing people that knows how to have a good time

  • dux
    • October 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM
    • #75
    Quote from Skjalg

    I think people should be allowed to do stuff that they think are fun as long as it doesnt hurt other people. Buying a purple hat for your TF2 character doesn't hurt anyone. And I wouldn't really go so far as to call them stupid just because they are doing what they think is funny.Stupid is loathing people that knows how to have a good time

    Oh way to be a killjoy skjalg

  • arhurt
    • October 26, 2010 at 12:57 PM
    • #76

    The free content is still going to be available... maybe there will be fewer releases due to a mix of people trying to come up with better models (good thing) and others thinking that not releasing it will increase the odds of valve selecting them (not true).

    So if you want to replace all the sounds with your voice, have dildo knifes and reskin TF2 with resident evil characters, by all means do.

    As for levels what I think they could implement is a kind of community voting/rating system and simply make the commitment to purchase the top ranking custom levels from time to time.

  • zaphod
    • October 26, 2010 at 6:41 PM
    • #77

    You know you are getting old when you start dismissing emerging trends with the phrase "back in the day".

  • -HP-
    • October 26, 2010 at 10:18 PM
    • #78

    Back in the days we play shooters with a mouse.

  • 2d-chris
    • October 27, 2010 at 9:34 AM
    • #79

  • Nysuatro
    • October 27, 2010 at 10:06 AM
    • #80

    I guess a lot can be changed with good marketing. I mis the time where I used a free homer model to play counterstrike.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Tangerine

    Harry Poster
    July 18, 2026 at 11:10 AM
  2. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  3. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  4. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  5. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  6. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  7. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  8. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  9. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  10. Classic Maps Reborn For CS2

    SillySpaceCat
    May 31, 2026 at 10:33 PM

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™