Izuno wins the thread. ![]()
Posts by ⌐■_■
-
-
Quote from seir
+1
Nice colors too! At what ISO did you shoot it?
ISO was about 200 but I've added grain layer as overlay with a vignette to make it less clear.
Ah, that explains
thanks! -
Quote from moroes
Nice contrast Seir!
+1
Nice colors too! At what ISO did you shoot it?
-
A good friend of mine has the X100 and I've only heard positive things about it from him. He also takes it literally everywhere he goes. And apart from all that; he is a seriously talented professional photographer, so I guess that counts for few points too.

Anyone interested: http://www.jarnokraayvanger.nl/

-
[Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/tq6XM.jpg?1]
[Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/gLOqm.jpg?1]
-
I'm glad you're going to be fine!
Good luck with the recovery!! -
Yeah, APS-C sensors have technology on their side but still... Full Format is way more charming. I mean, that's about as close as you can get to analog photography with the advantages of digital image processing

-
Those two are out of my price range unfortunately..
The 5D seems a logical step in the future though.I have bought a Canon 1D Mark II with 51.000 clicks for € 425 euro's. The body.. it's... I have no words for it. This comes close though:
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.Thanks for replying sirs

-
Is the 60D actually that much better then the 50D? One thing that bothers me though, is their APC sized sensors. I really don't care about megapixel, I have no commercial plans. I just want image quality
Now I'm considering the 1D Mk 2 (APS-H size sensor beats the APS-C any day of the week).What kind of camera you shoot with Seir?

-
Quote
":dr21ohqz]Also, 5D is smaller, and lighter (40% lighter, 850 g vs 1,385 g) and it's already quite big, that fact alone is a killer for me in the 1Ds.
That's just your subconscious way of telling you, you would never have what it takes to own that camera
Thanks for the replies!

I'm talking about the 5D MK1 vs the 1Ds MK1, pardon me. And I'm actually more in love with the bulky 1 series design then I am with the lighter (and probably more practical) 5D design. I know it's probably just mindfuck but I want to have the feeling my camera is a tank.
The extra weight also enables me to be a little tiny bit more steady while taking shots.But damnit, now you got me looking at the 5D MK2 again..

-
Hey guys,
So far I've owned the Canon D30, 10D, 20D, 30D 50D and the nikon D200 (in a 6 year lifespan) Now I've just sold my 50D and I'm thinking about either spending my money on a used Canon 1Ds or a Canon 5D. I'm not really considering Nikon, since I already have my own collection of EF lenses. Another thing: I can buy a used 1D (without the s) for exactly 300 euros (with box, extra battery and everything originally included). Is the 1Ds worth the extra 200 euros (considering I'm not into commercial photography and 123900238Mb file sizes)? I must say I'm charmed by the features the D1 has for the price albeit that 4.2 mp seems a little bit... primitive. Anyway, my next camera will probably be my ''friend'' the next couple of years since I feel that I must stop trying out all these different bodies
.Things I regard as important are ergonomics (being a big fan of the eos 1 bodies), durability, sensor size and quality (and since I've only owned APS-C based dslr's I'd really like to try full frame) and fast and reliable focus.
Things I disregard: mega pixel quantity, built in flashes.
I know this is a really specific question and I'm not sure how many experienced photographers Mapcore has, but I figure it's worth the shot


-
-
-
-
not sure what kind of pussy you guys are / were used to????


model looks killer tho

-
This video has been removed by the user.

-
those shots brought me to the edge of my seat

-
loving it!
if there would be a way to make the illuminated strokes less contrasty and bright, i think it'll even look better. not sure though.. 
-
-
that's harsh... i'm no specialist on this subject, but shouldn't Obsidian have ringed a bell about this before? seems a bit shady though to put into a contract that a bonus is being given based on some random value rather then a part of the gross revenue's.