That's not advertising, that's sponsoring.
There is a big difference between the two.
That's not advertising, that's sponsoring.
There is a big difference between the two.
Hmmm not bad... I would like to say a thing or two about more interesting ceiling structures though.
The eggfart series was fairly played if I remember correctly. Hmmm but that was crystal~
Well that too, but it's still a landmark for HL 1 mapping. That map brings so many good memories
~~
Who wouldn't have? It's one of HL's best maps imo.
Classic mazzle map depth and complexity, lovely! I want more!
~~ And I want something more mazzle like features added.
Oh yus... Mazy's HL1 maps were phenomenal ![]()
Phenomenal~!
maz.... kissmeyer was the bomb~~ it always inspired me to map~
Warm liquid goo is from the first Austin Powers~
Yet you fail to give reasoned explanations to why a person should believe in something supernatural and illogical, characterized by extreme naivism.
Do you expect me to believe in something that was created before man knew what gravity is or that the earth is round, or the fact that christianity is not the only religion to exist on this planet? One can say that christianity itself has undergone countless evolutionary transformations while abolishing smaller and weaker religions along its path.
Why must everything be explained? What exactly is religion and why are there so many and differing versions of how our world came into existence? What is time for that matter?
Ignorance. Desperate attempts to explain the unknown. Attempts to create structure and meaning into our simple lives. This is where evolution once more comes in: put two groups of people in two highly different and enclosed areas. After a while you will notice two new and distinct cultures with unique subcultures, values and beliefs, ideologies, etc.
Nexus,
just WTF are you on?
It's not a bullsquid, it's a bullchicken!
What's with all the shitty movies recently?
... and Campaignjunkie~
Yeah it was a shame. The majority of the team who used to work on the HL1 version have moved on.
I don't really see anything special in it, an overly simplistic, brief, naive, and uncritical summary of globalization using only two tertiary sources.
My opinion is no. I expect such marketing to backfire in the long run. Neither does such marketing represent my values or my view of effective advertising. It's still a very very generic commercial which is something that should be avoided in a world where the amount of commercial clutter is still increasing.