Yeah, they're all so subjective. I've found a few sites where I tend to agree with most of the reviews (Eurogamer ftw), so I tend to skim over their take on stuff when it comes out but even then I've greatly enjoyed some games that review in the 60s and 70s and hated games that review in the 80s and 90s.
PCGamer's Bioshock review
-
-
Game reviews suck
The best thing you can do is go to a review consensus site or check forums, sites like Gamespot are next to worthless for honesty and integrity. And official magazines are...
complete crap
-
I love PC Gamer because they gave us the highest score of any magazine or site...but KFS heh...I can just see the rage through the computer screen any time you see "PC Gamer"
On topic, did anyone really expect Bioshock to score any lower than high 90s?
-
Quote from Bl1tz
I love PC Gamer because they gave us the highest score of any magazine or site...but KFS heh...I can just see the rage through the computer screen any time you see "PC Gamer"On topic, did anyone really expect Bioshock to score any lower than high 90s?
I think there was alot of concern the game wouldn't live up to its own hype
-
http://www.mazy.com for the best reviews of all the best games on all the best platforms

-
Quote from Skjalg
http://www.mazy.com for the best reviews of all the best games on all the best platforms

OMGF ZIDANE COFFEE MAKER REVIEW!!!
-
Yeah, sticking to one place (or even a few) for reviews is risky business. I tend to use Metacritic as a good judge; search for the game, get the average score of dozens and dozens of respectable game sites.
-
-
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!