1. Forums
  2. Discord
  3. About Mapcore
  4. Patreon Supporters
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Pages
  • Forum
  • More Options
  1. Mapcore
  2. Discussions
  3. Off-Topic

POTUS 2016

  • D3ads
  • November 2, 2016 at 11:16 PM
  • -HP-
    • November 9, 2016 at 9:20 PM
    • #81

    Kind of ironic when exactly 27 years ago today the whole world celebrated the falling of the Berlin Wall, 1989.

    And 27 years later, we're getting ready to build a new one.

    [Blocked Image: http://67.media.tumblr.com/7f5f424fa768b587bad11a5b26168f8d/tumblr_odevn8q8Ei1s7e5k5o1_1280.jpg]

  • Vorontsov
    • November 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM
    • #82

    I don't think he will go through with the wall, but if he does I would like to see how exactly he would pull it off. Also I don't think a nations border is comparable to the Berlin wall, hundreds of nations have secured borders. But there are nice doors here and there that you can pass through after being checked. I would agree with your analogy if he was building a wall to separate California from the rest of the US (just an example), but no such thing is being done.

  • Deathy
    • November 9, 2016 at 9:44 PM
    • #83

    The poll race was a close call, first on Florida and lastly on Pennsylvania, finally making it impossible to get her the victory. Most of the support for HC came from metropolitan regions concentrated (based on won states) from the east and west coasts, while Trump basically had the rest. This also showed almost always in inner-state results for rural counties going to Trump and urban to Clinton.

    So yes, the assumptions, that people were definitely fed up that politics weren't made in favour of them lead to a huge support for Trump. And although he had a lot of scandals in the past, he is a man of the media business. They wanted someone who would look good as a president (not literally, performance and appearance-wise), while having core topics at heart that affected the issues people had on their minds.

    Hillary Clinton on the other hand is an establishment hardliner who knows politics and acted way too intransparent in a lot of cases in the past, which made her a lot less appealing than a DJT, although you might say that Trumps transparency was to neglect/negate statements from the past. In a way, there was no lesser evil to choose from, it was the choice of the voting population to choose their lesser evil.

    Here's the interesting part for the next 4 years (especially for Europe):

    With Brexit and Trump to take effect in 2017 and also a few elections in Europe (in Germany with support in regional elections for populist parties up to 25%) there might also be a new strategy for EU-NATO military relations coming up, e.g. Germany and France announcing to cooperate more. Or "trading" agreements like TTIP and TISA seem unlikely at this point, or atleast postponed.

    Now, this might be a good message for some people on the other side of the big pond, but what I fear the most, is that people will have real anxieties in the US of A, because they may or may not lose some parts of their life, identification or freedoms. Nobody should assume that all Trump voters will slaughter illegal immigrants confirmed by the general vote, nonetheless all eyes should always be open to unjust actions and repression.

    P.S.: Oh yeah, with such a big majority as Republicans, it's time to get a federal Identity Document, so you can finally stop claiming voter fraud or rigged elections. Just a nice idea from Europe.

    P.P.S.: The wall is just a metaphor for better border control. Perhaps some better fence installations at the borders.

  • D3ads
    • November 9, 2016 at 10:23 PM
    • #84

    I'll address some of the points made in a bit, but first did anyone watch Trump's victory speech? I mean.. it's hardly amazing and he waffles on a bit like he tends to do but he thanks his supporters and reaches out to the Democrats and Republication voters who didn't want him and pledges to unify the country:

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • Steppenwolf
    • November 10, 2016 at 12:01 AM
    • #85
    Quote from (HP)

    2 hours ago, (HP) said: Kind of ironic when exactly 27 years ago today the whole world celebrated the falling of the Berlin Wall, 1989.

    And 27 years later, we're getting ready to build a new one.

    [Blocked Image: http://67.media.tumblr.com/7f5f424fa768b587bad11a5b26168f8d/tumblr_odevn8q8Ei1s7e5k5o1_1280.jpg]

    That's a false analogy. The Berlin wall got constructed by the East German government for the purpose to keep its own people in.

  • Sentura
    • November 10, 2016 at 1:02 AM
    • #86

    Some good points being made in this thread. I agree 100% with @FrieChamp - let's see how it pans out. @D3ads, pretty solid analysis, I came to many of the same conclusions. I definitely think if HRC had been elected and had opted for the NFZ we'd be closer to a nuclear war than ever. Even if a nuclear escalation wasn't in the cards, the destabilization of the area would cause Europe to be under much greater pressure than what we already have today.

    There are of course (many) negatives to his presidency, but overall I just hope he has the mind to put his business above his personal beliefs. In which case everything is probably not going to be as bad as we imagine.

  • -HP-
    • November 10, 2016 at 1:55 AM
    • #87
    Quote from Steppenwolf

    1 hour ago, Steppenwolf said: That's a false analogy. The Berlin wall got constructed by the East German government for the purpose to keep its own people in.

    Yeah I know that, my point was that walls fix nothing, quite the contrary.

  • Radu
    • November 10, 2016 at 6:40 AM
    • #88
    Quote from D3ads

    8 hours ago, D3ads said: I'll address some of the points made in a bit, but first did anyone watch Trump's victory speech? I mean.. it's hardly amazing and he waffles on a bit like he tends to do but he thanks his supporters and reaches out to the Democrats and Republication voters who didn't want him and pledges to unify the country:

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    The way he gesticulates and speaks makes one think of highschool prom queens. Just my two cents.

  • Skybex
    • November 10, 2016 at 10:06 AM
    • #89

    This does not come at all as a surprise to me that he won, but first I will point out that I had no horse in this race. I have been following Trump since before the primaries simply because he was an entertaining character, listened to a lot of his speeches and read up on his proposed ideas. For me this whole ordeal was like watching a soap opera.

    But I have to say that the liberals/left brought this on themselves. I has been clear for a long time that the "ordinary" people feel very disenfranchised by the status quo. The biggest most recent example being the brexit result, but also the rise of more right wing parties over Europe. The left recently have been pushing too far left with crazy ideas such as safe spaces, trigger warnings, what toilets trans people should use as well as more every day things that people care about such as immigration, BLM and certain socialist views. So much of this goes against what many ordinary people care about that you end up with groups such as the alt right cropping up. It feels that a lot of people just want to push back against all this neo liberal ideology.

    Then of course you have the whole political ruling class thing. Clinton represents everything that supporters of both Sanders and Trump were against. You couldn't have a more clear cut case of someone being more of the same, yet they pushed so hard for her to be the nomination and in doing so cheated a very popular Sanders out of the nomination which of course made much of his voter base go over to Trump.

    And then of course you have the attacks. Anyone who didn't think Trump was "Orange Hitler" is and uneducated racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic. They tried these attacks on people who wanted to leave the EU with brexit and it backfired. Trumps opponents in the primaries tried it and it backfired. And then Clinton tried it and it backfired. All while the media is reporting such obviously biased news that it turned so many people away from them and reinforces that the media is in Clinton's pocket. The polls are saying that Clinton is ahead, but Trump is bringing in many thousands of people to his almost daily rallies while Clinton's rally every few weeks gets a couple of hundred at best. Clinton has such strong supporters that she needs to invest millions into CTR to blanket online communities to support her. Then you have all the criminal activities that they tried to deflect onto Trump. All of this just united all the Trump supporters and turned off so many on the fence people to just avoid Clintons horror story.

    In this soap opera I watched for over a year, Clinton is the clear cut villain of the story while Trump is the anti hero and Sanders the defeated hero.

    http://i.imgur.com/8o8MKrM.gifv

  • dux
    • November 10, 2016 at 1:38 PM
    • #90

    I found this an interesting read.

    Quote

    Quote

    Needless to say I was right. Hillary had no plan against Trump. She used the same attacks against Trump that his Republican rivals did: he's a bigot, a racist, a blah blah blah. That didn't work in the primaries and it didn't work in the general election.

    As I stated back in March there is no political strategy to beat Trump. He's not playing by political rules, that's the whole point. I did see two paths to beating him, and neither was about Hillary:

    The first strategy was Bernie winning the Democratic Primaries. He had the swag, the charisma, the cuddly Grandpa mentality. His appeal was the same as that of Biden: Go-lucky, real, passionate. Unfortunately he was running against the Clinton Machine/DNC and he got churned out like a hunk of beef.

    The second strategy was Bernie, yes THAT Bernie, again. He should have been the VP even though Hillary leans center way more than progressive. Her inability to negotiate was her undoing. It's not just about the Bernie voters that refused to vote Hillary, it was about their enthusiasm. Like it or not they were a ground-game unlike anything anyone's ever seen. The ridiculous amount of donations, the millions of phone calls, the millions of doors knocked. Their passion was most needed against Trump.

    Yes, Bernie campaigned for Hillary during the general election, but it was no longer the same. Bernie used to be their guy, their champion that could fight against the 1%, for $15 minimum wage, free healthcare, and free tuition. He couldn't do that while campaigning for Hillary without being on the ballot because everyone knew she didn't really care about any of that.

    So what was Hillary left with? No passion, no drive, no enthusiasm, no Bernie, no Presidency. She was too proud, and that, ladies and gents, is what Trump exposed to perfection.

    Yes folks, Trump is a master strategist, and he knew Hillary's weakness was her stoic character. During the campaign you often heard Hillary mention that the Republicans have been attacking her for 30 years and never found anything to hurt her. She wore that as a badge of honor, she thought that made her stronger. But, as Trump had done in the Republican Primaries, he took the quality his opponents covet most and he turned it on its head.

    Crooked Hillary. Hillary Rotten Clinton. Drain the Swamp. Lock her up.

    Much like Picasso's abstract paintings, Trump's brush strokes made little sense to most people. Yes, she's a political power house, yes she's a stalwart in her convictions. But that also makes her stiff in her beliefs. The world is ever-changing, how can someone maintain their convictions for 30+ years unless they're crooked and a cheat? How can they maintain power with the elites unless their entire cesspool of a swamp was also polluted? Lock her up.

    Trump took her stoicism and grounded it into a pulp. His first attack on Hillary during the general election was that "If she wasn't playing the woman card she wouldn't even get 5% of the vote." BOOM, head shot. How did Hillary respond? "If fighting for women's rights and equal pay is playing the woman card, then deal. Me. IN!"

    This played perfectly into Trump's hand. He knew she'd be defiant in being a woman and take that attack personally. He used her soundbites to wedge a gap between men and women voters. The male vote wasn't 2:1 for Trump because they were misogynists, it was because Hillary's words excluded their existence. Remember 'The Art of War'? It's all about divide and conquer. When did Hillary ever talk about men's issues? Never. While Hillary thought she was being stoic in protecting the woman card, Trump was actually playing the man card.

    I could go on and on, but truth be told I haven't slept yet and I've written too much as is. If you're interested in reading more I'll post again tomorrow. There's plenty to talk about. How Trump had more Hispanic voters than any Republican in history, how Trump had more LGBT voters than any Republican in history (even though his VP is the biggest anti-LGBT in politics), or how Trump ended up with 48% of the woman vote even after those Access Hollywood tapes.

    Regardless of how you feel about the election, it truly was a masterful performance by Donald Trump. One that will go down in history as not only the most shocking victory, but I would dare say the most expertly perfected victory in US political history.

    Display More
  • -HP-
    • November 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM
    • #91

    The fun begins... we're witnessing exactly the same thing we saw with brexit

    https://twitter.com/i/moments/796417517157830656

  • Vorontsov
    • November 10, 2016 at 6:49 PM
    • #92

    Anecdotal evidence. Meanwhile Soros is funding protests against Trump's presidency and public+private property is being destroyed & violence incited. No one talks about the Clinton thugs that beat up an old Trump supporter and stole his car... because he supported a different candidate. One side of the spectrum aren't the only victims, none of this "holier than thou" bs.

  • -HP-
    • November 10, 2016 at 6:50 PM
    • #93
    Quote from dux

    5 hours ago, dux said: The first strategy was Bernie winning the Democratic Primaries. He had the swag, the charisma, the cuddly Grandpa mentality. His appeal was the same as that of Biden: Go-lucky, real, passionate. Unfortunately he was running against the Clinton Machine/DNC and he got churned out like a hunk of beef.

    The second strategy was Bernie, yes THAT Bernie, again. He should have been the VP even though Hillary leans center way more than progressive. Her inability to negotiate was her undoing. It's not just about the Bernie voters that refused to vote Hillary, it was about their enthusiasm. Like it or not they were a ground-game unlike anything anyone's ever seen. The ridiculous amount of donations, the millions of phone calls, the millions of doors knocked. Their passion was most needed against Trump.

    Yes, Bernie campaigned for Hillary during the general election, but it was no longer the same. Bernie used to be their guy, their champion that could fight against the 1%, for $15 minimum wage, free healthcare, and free tuition. He couldn't do that while campaigning for Hillary without being on the ballot because everyone knew she didn't really care about any of that.

    So what was Hillary left with? No passion, no drive, no enthusiasm, no Bernie, no Presidency. She was too proud, and that, ladies and gents, is what Trump exposed to perfection.

    This is proven to be true over and over again! The DNC brought this on themselves, and on us. They just ruined the country they spent the last 8 years building. Bernie was the only weapon they had.


    [Blocked Image: https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15036481_198898693893086_8857840001148685390_n.jpg?oh=5cb378a808b1c6f828eb0c3108a38f69&oe=5897420A]


    [Blocked Image: https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14925613_658722100975487_7852154603680495522_n.jpg?oh=247101db42c97f17a02a73dbc05d99da&oe=58C62A45]

  • dux
    • November 11, 2016 at 2:54 AM
    • #94

    History. Like it or not.

    [Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/HNtyANM.jpg]

  • Buddy
    • November 11, 2016 at 11:45 AM
    • #95
    Quote from dux

    8 hours ago, dux said: History. Like it or not.

    [Blocked Image: http://i.imgur.com/HNtyANM.jpg]

    Yeah, first orange president!

  • FrieChamp
    • November 11, 2016 at 1:30 PM
    • #96

    http://imgur.com/gallery/47h4y

    http://i.imgur.com/PALJ4oz.gifv

  • blackdog
    • November 11, 2016 at 1:48 PM
    • #97

    Damn election, masses of Americans now seem to want to move to Canada (and new Zealand or Australia) so much their website has been crashing. My dream to move to Canada could stay like that if they follow suit :(

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/mobile.nyt…l?client=safari

    http://qz.com/832374/donald-…-stop-crashing/

  • Vaya
    • November 11, 2016 at 2:30 PM
    • #98

    If the DNC doesn't drop this whole identity-based politics mantra then we're looking at 8 years of trump.

    https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=white males&src=typd

    being inclusive means speaking on behalf of all people- not just the minorities.

  • Seldoon182
    • November 11, 2016 at 5:01 PM
    • #99

    People mix politic and professionalization of politic. Here's an example of professionalization of politic :

    [Blocked Image: https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7TKtvFXI0rqQvLTG/giphy.gif]

    Politics isn't about to put a ballot every 5 years. Politic is "I'm the only one to know what I want".

  • -HP-
    • November 11, 2016 at 6:19 PM
    • #100
    Quote from Vaya

    3 hours ago, Vaya said: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=white males&src=typd

    being inclusive means speaking on behalf of all people- not just the minorities.

    When the unexplainable happens, people love pointing fingers so at least they have some sort of a scapegoat and who else is a better candidate than blaming "white males the patriarchy" for the worlds problems, that's just so not true it baffles me the left can be this regressive and flat out ignorant. Along with the DNC fuckup, I believe It's the reason liberals lost the election. These people are to the left what the tea party is to the right therefor it's harder and harder to find a middle ground in today's politics, it could have gone either way, it's a pendulum.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login
Discord

The Mapcore Discord is our lively IRC channel of the 2000s reborn. Chat about level design, gaming, and more.

Latest Posts

  1. Why is data science needed

    shilpa
    July 17, 2026 at 12:39 PM
  2. Any of the old guard still around? D:

    Warby
    July 12, 2026 at 8:23 PM
  3. About our archived forums

    Thrik
    June 30, 2026 at 2:12 PM
  4. Mapcore Discord

    mason_fan123
    June 24, 2026 at 8:52 PM
  5. [CS2] Valley

    Serialmapper
    June 22, 2026 at 11:56 AM
  6. Free Music / SFX Resource - Over 2500 Tracks

    Eric Matyas
    June 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM
  7. Pango [WIP]

    Elowen
    June 11, 2026 at 10:13 AM
  8. [CS2] Dvina

    Jeremy Rivera
    June 11, 2026 at 10:03 AM
  9. Bridges 2.0 by NEXSIDE, MAP SHOWCASE. ( Steam Workshop )

    MrTrane18
    June 1, 2026 at 7:46 PM
  10. Classic Maps Reborn For CS2

    SillySpaceCat
    May 31, 2026 at 10:33 PM

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 10 Guests
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Contact
Powered by WoltLab Suite™