RAGE

fuck me that looks incredible....

"Living, breathing, cinematic experience" made me laugh

The animations on characters look strange, or is it just me?

Looks gorgeous~~

Also, John Goodman is awesome but his voice doesn't really fit that character IMO, as in when I see that character his voice doesn't feel like it could come from him :G

same... I always think about it when watching the trailers

Incredible set pieces

It looks incredible, looks like ID are resetting the goalposts of graphical detail just as they've done many times before. Crysis about to be dethroned

[Blocked Image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/deathcrush/rage_is_the_new_graphics_king.jpg]

Quote from D3ads

It looks incredible, looks like ID are resetting the goalposts of graphical detail just as they've done many times before. Crysis about to be dethroned [Blocked Image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v221/deathcrush/rage_is_the_new_graphics_king.jpg]

I doubt it really . After seeing the Carmack talk, some of the blurry screenshots they released and how in the trailers they only show setpice/far shots, I feel textures are going to be blurrrrrry. Carmack even said so himself. Granted, it does still all look nice all together, but Crysis 2's graphical fidelity can't be matched I think, especially with the new updates and DX11.

Sure, they have graphical fidelity with Crysis 2... But the environment is pretty boring. It's just a city, not exactly hard to re-create a city is it! (I'm not doubting the amount of time that went into it). Rage at least has its own world and art style, and I would much rather work on something more fictional than city-building.

Rage > Crysis 2.

Quote from PogoP

Sure, they have graphical fidelity with Crysis 2... But the environment is pretty boring. It's just a city, not exactly hard to re-create a city is it!.

Oh dude.. you have no idea what you're talking about. Making an intact city or recent destroyed city is much harder than making post-apocaliptic or natural environments like a jungle.

On a tottaly destroied environment (like post apocaliptic) you put a rubble pile in the middle of the road, and it's ok, you put a destroyed pillar in the middle the road, and it's ok, you get away with a lot of stuff, cos it's destroyed.

Same with jungle environments, you quickly brush a few trees, bushes and grass, and shit looks real.

Recreating a city, you need to follow rules, loads of them. Something as small as putting a street sign in the middle of the sidewalk, instead of the edge, and you'll see how it will stand out like a sore thumb, the eye can tell in a second there's something wrong there; that's something you can't have on more stylized / natural / destroyed environments.

they both look utterly awesome in their own way. from what I have seen of rage the art style seems more cohesive though. but that's just because they have an actual theme, "the real world" is not really a theme, more a goalpost.

Yeah that's what I was getting at, I didn't word myself very well. I'm just saying it's more fun to work on something artistic rather than just re-creating the real world. That shit aint art yo.

Still, Crysis does look good and I know a lot of hard work went into it.

I'm not going to have enough monies for all these $60 titles

Im so getting it. Looks and sounds great! And i´m a sucker for post-apocalyptic games.

Watched Breaking Bad last night and was surprised to see this...

Haha yeah, LOVE Breaking Bad but I hate that Rage is made out to be a lightgun game :G But it serves a purpose in terms of the plot

saw that too and was offended by the lightgun ness