Zyn Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7123582.stm The companies behind Call of Duty and World of Warcraft are merging in a deal which could shake up the global video games industry. Activision and Blizzard have said they will form "the world's most profitable games business" in a deal worth $18.8bn (£9.15bn). US-based Activision also makes hit console games such as the Tony Hawk series and Guitar Hero. Nine million people pay a monthly subscription to play World of Warcraft. Oh snap! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dux Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 World of Guitars Online set during WW2 Normandy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrik Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 That would certainly produce one behemoth of a company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zyn Posted December 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 It has begun : http://www.activisionblizzard.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 how much $$ would blizzard already have got for WoW ? Isnt it enough to build a spacestation or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KungFuSquirrel Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Enough to put $2 billion in this deal to ATVI's $1 billion. Curious what this will mean for some of the ATVI-owned studios, they were already closing down and merging a number of them (Shaba, Luxoflux, and Z-axis I think all got closed/merged into Treyarch, as did Gray Matter). IW, Neversoft, and Treyarch are probably gold but the non-LA studios like Raven, VV, etc. don't seem to get as much love. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e-freak Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 if they close raven they go to far - i mean - raven is gaming-history, you can't simply shut it down don't the anglosachsian countries have a Antitrust Division? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skjalg Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 my hope is that blizzard will influence enough to keep most of em. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Algor Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Sweet cuppin' cakes, that is some deal... It will be interesting to see what becomes of this, as with what happens to Bioware/Pandemic now. Though I would have preferred a better name... Actablizzard, Blizzavision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warby Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 can i has stockz please ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SixThree Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 can i has stockz please ? Get in line! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Coming Spring 2008 from Activision Blizzard - Diablo 3. Interact with other players at the local Applebee's! Engage in PvP battles at the UFC/TapOut arena! Heal your wounds with Pepsi rejuvination potions! Buy and upgrade weapons at Cabela's, Wal-Mart, and Bass Pro Shops! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bl1tz Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 I don't see much good coming of this. Activision is probably the most shameless in terms of wanting its devs to crank out the same franchised shit year after year. You know they won't want Blizzard to do anything other than something with the name Starcraft, Warcraft or Diablo for the next 10 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 I think Blizzard would be fine with that to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrik Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 They've already been doing it for 10 years without Activision, so doing it for another 10 years wouldn't exactly be much of a surprise. Although publishers can be a bit of a pain, it does seem like they catch a bit too much flak for stuff that's just as much down to the developers and audience a lot of the time too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.