st0lve Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 You really thing so Sentura? HL2 Ep2 is gonna be isometric and turn based combat. Do you think that people would be like "oh fine, no problem"? You have to be kidding. About me not wanting a Fallout 3 game, is because the game Bethesda is making, isn't Fallout 3. It's the 5th game in the Fallout series, except that Fallout "3" (aka this) is so far off, that Brotherhood of Steel is more correct when it comes to the storyline and such. If it was a spin-off, it would be ok, but calling it Fallout 3 is just wrong. Peris, there are more than 11 angry guys over at NMA, and you can't forget Duck and Cover, RPG Codex and all the other smaller sites who actually want a "true" sequel, and not this. By "true" sequel, that doesn't mean that they have to use 1998 tech, but just making a game that is "correct" when it comes to art style, storyline and such, cause for now, they have failed with 80% of what we've seen in the pictures.. Quote
Sentura Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 making a game that is "correct" when it comes to art style, storyline and such, cause for now, they have failed with 80% of what we've seen in the pictures.. how would you propose that? the same art (from what i can deduct from various sketches and the teaser) looks like fallout. but please, if you know how to make the "real" fallout style, why not go tell them personally? i mean, it's not like it's gonna help by posting the same thing over and over again here. also you seem worried by the story, which is sort of weird. even if we do take in account that the first two games were linked (although through a missing generation), the third installment doesn't have to follow that line. i don't get why you are so overzealous over this. Quote
st0lve Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 Read this; there is a section about style: http://www.nma-fallout.com/article.php?id=37054 Quick sample; the super mutants: http://www.nma-fallout.com/forum/album_page.php?pic_id=2286 Quote
KoKo5oVaR Posted June 22, 2007 Author Report Posted June 22, 2007 It's more a conflict between industrial game developing and the little studios of before actually, to me though .. Quote
Thrik Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 st0lve, stop geeking out and just wait for the game to be released before you write it off. Jesus. This thread has become incredibly sad. Quote
Rick_D Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 http://www.nma-fallout.com/article.php?id=37054 that is the whiniest, most annoying article ever written by a bunch of geek fanboys with nothing better to do with their time than whine about shit that if they cared about so deeply would be working on themselves. pathetic. F3 looks pretty good and bethesda are amazing, guess quality breeds jealousy or something. Quote
Chunks Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 The fanboys wouldn't ever be satisfied regardless. I just don't understand their logic. Bethesda is there to make money and noone is going to buy an isometric turn based strategy game. Frankly, I'm happy as hell to hear that the franchise was bought because interplay certainly wasn't going to ever be in the position to make it. First person combat is where it is at right now and it is a no-brainer that is the direction they should go in. I have high hopes for this game, but at the same time I will be prepared to see some of the flaws from oblivion, but hopefully not. I just don't get fanboyism. I can't stand reading those boards Quote
Minos Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 eww stop reading those boards st0lve NMA is awesome for fanart and general Fallout content but those geeks are annoying as fuck. Of course Fallout 3 isn't going to be anything like the original games... it's not even being made by the same guys, what could you expect. Quote
Thrik Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 One unfortunate thing about old classics getting a modern sequel is that the old fans always want nothing more than essentially the same game but with better graphics. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but depending on the game it might simply not work and be that successful in a modern climate. I mean, they are professionals. They probably know better than most what's actually going to work for the majority of gamers, especially if you take into account their portfolio. Let them get the fucking game out before you go on a zealous rampage of criticism. Quote
Rick_D Posted June 22, 2007 Report Posted June 22, 2007 amen some of their released content looks great anyway - I am really looking forward to this and I imagine I'll only get more interested as they release more stuff. Quote
KoKo5oVaR Posted June 23, 2007 Author Report Posted June 23, 2007 Honestly, i don't really care if they change the gameplay as long as they keep as much as they can the universe. Still, just to remember, this is how good oblivion voice actors were in the french version http://kokosovar.free.fr/lameoblivionsounds.mp3 And this pretty much frighten me. If they provide again such bad acting, especially if it's fallout, i'll be obliged to buy the game in export. Or most likely : bittorenting it... Quote
Minos Posted June 23, 2007 Report Posted June 23, 2007 http://kokosovar.free.fr/lameoblivionsounds.mp3 aahahaha... ..hahahaha ...hahahah hahaha... I can already picture pipboy running around the Den killing kids and yelling like that Quote
st0lve Posted July 1, 2007 Report Posted July 1, 2007 They have removed groin shot. What a fucking horrible mistake. Quote
Sentura Posted July 2, 2007 Report Posted July 2, 2007 can someone please lock this thread already? it might be a bit selfish but i am getting tired of st0lve's bickering. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.