D3ads Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 ...why did they bother? http://www.quake2evolved.com/blurforum/ ... genumber=1 I laughed so hard at those comparison screenshots, dear God... Quote
e-freak Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 i that hud any higher resoluted than 64 pixels? Quote
KungFuSquirrel Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 Oh my god, no dynamic lighting???? My faith in humanity is shattered. Seriously, that's the game. The hud they could have beefed up, sure, and I will go on a limb and say that the control setup screen is a bit ass, but the rest looks fine to me.... still better looking than some titles in the PC sector. Solid and consistent art direction will generally trump flashy features. Quote
st0lve Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 Wow, another franchise that UBI milk for what it's worth, just what I said in #Mapcore yesterday Quote
SnipaMasta Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 still better looking than some titles in the PC sector. Are you being serious? It doensn't look that great, but eh, gameplay > graphics. Although I wouldn't feel happy paying full money for that. Quote
Warby Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 i was really looking forward to this and the lowres hud and splashscreen dont bother me at all but wtf on the controll binding window .... the AIM is bieng bound to 4 keys instead of the mouse W T F ????? Quote
Minos Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 aw the hud looks really shitty :/ The game still looks awsome though. Quote
aevirex Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 I really don't know what it is, bu this game looked better on my Gamecube than on PC The controlscheme looks shitty too, however i do understand why they chose it, if you could use the mouse (and maybe strafe too) the game would be too fast and too easy. it worked quite well on gamecube and ps2 but i don't think it will work on pc... Quote
Ginger Lord Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 The PC is a PS2 port whereas the GC version was a visual remake so its visually superior. lol worthy indeed. Quote
e-freak Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 Notice to the Main-Coder: Next time do not hardcode "mat_fullbright 1" into the default application ^^ Quote
Mazy Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 IMO still one of the best looking games around (GC version that is), and its like 2 years old. It's a fucking disgrace what they did to that PC port :G But it is one of the best games made, so I guess its okay to play the PC port if you're cheap enough not to buy a Wii or GC (PS2 port should be okay too I guess) :G /me hides Quote
KungFuSquirrel Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 er, ok, I missed the comparison. The content is fine, but the new lighting is a bit of an artistic abortion. Quote
Tequila Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 There is no lighting. Absolutely tragic. Quote
Warby Posted February 6, 2007 Report Posted February 6, 2007 seriously WHAT THE FUCK they delayed the game twice so that they have enough time to completely fuck it up ????? id rather play the ps2 version on my pc with pcsx2 than that ! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.