KingNic Posted September 22, 2004 Report Posted September 22, 2004 As I said, the gameplay point is moot. I'll retract that the gameplay is bad. In my opinion, it is bad. Ok? I stand by the rest of my argument. And yes I have played it. I played it for half an hour at a friends house, and failed to have fun. I then grabbed the demo, and I got through 2 levels before realising that I find 'painting by numbers' to be more fun. Throughout the demo, I started to look closely at the graphics. I find Doom fun, I find Serious Sam fun. They're not deep, but they're just so OTT that they become fun. Doom3 is incredibly simple, and takes itself seriously, that I do not like. Quote
InsaneSingingBlender Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 amazing youve played 30 minutes! j00 r now 1337 gamepl@y kn0wer also you say that the shadows are too sharp. it takes incredible computing power to render real time soft shadows so shhh unless you have a gig video card and 5 gig ram Quote
KingNic Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 Why should I waste more than half an hour of my time if I haven't enjoyed a single moment of it so far? Well gee, sorry all for having an opinion that's different and not based on hype. Quote
GrayFox Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 You said you enjoyed Serious Sam and Doom but still you think Doom 3 is too simple? Quote
FrieChamp Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 On what machine did you play Doom3 on? Pentium II 466 mhz and a Voodoo 2? Jesus...open your eyes while playing... Quote
CrazyMAC Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 i think gameplay points are rubbish as its the same as the first one!!! why would you expect anything diffrent !??!?!~ doom = doom3 (in short) YOUR FIRED KING NIC! have your desk cleared by 2 Quote
mawibse Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 DoomIII looks awesome, but it wont do a European city as good as Source does. Source looks awesome, but it wont do a sci-fi horror corridor shooter as good as DoomIII does. DoomIII was fun, if you like corridor horror shooters, like HL1. HL2 isn't out yet but trying to take out a Strider looks like loads of fun. Wadda you say, should we start comparing Band of brotherens with Vampire: Blood wines next? Clearly they are so vintage now that DoomIII is out, cause grphx is everything! :roll: Quote
mikezilla Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 you say that like its a good point. Quote
RD Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 I think the doom3 gameplay is medium. Doom1 and 2 had better, cuz the rooms were giant and there were hundreds of enemies u could mow down. Doom3 is all tight corridors and theres no long range or even medium range combat which kinda ruins it for me Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.