Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I doubt that they're fake, primarily because not only would faking something like that just be retarded, but also because those particular 3D paintings wouldn't be that difficult to produce if you do indeed have a projector giving you direct guidance as suggested. I am impressed a lot more by those street pavement images where the artist has obviously spent a lot of time working out the shading and angles needed to produce a 3D-looking image.

Sure, if they were extremely complex images with loads of detail I might suspect them of being fake, but the detail on these could be outputted by pretty much anybody if given a projector and some ladders. As for it only working from one angle... well that's the point. It couldn't be any other way.

Posted

I've seen world class photoshopping at Something Awful. This stuff is a grade below that. Plus, it's on a no-name website with no corroborative information. Smells too much like photoshoppery

Posted

hmm....ok so looked furhter...and I am no photoshop expert...but something about the edges of the color sections looks funky to me....and in that image with the big yellow target symbol, doesn't the upper image contain a wall mounted tv monitor, but the lower image does not have it? Wonder what the deal is with that. I did notice in that shot there is writing on the whiteboard in the lower image but not in the upper one.

Hmm...dunno...but...

i_want_to_believe-web.jpg

Posted

If you carefully inspect the placement of the lines and shapes you'll see that they're perfectly consistent between shots. You simply couldn't fake the distortion as convincingly as this without modeling the entire scene, projecting it virtually and doing an overlay, which is an inaccurate process anyway. It really would be easier to just do it than to try to fake it. The photo quality is ass but they are real.

The aliasing is an ugly artifact of the browser resizing the photos - right click -> View Image to see them larger and cleaner.

Izuno the monitor you mention is simply outside of the shot, you can see that it is mounted to a nearer wall than the one that the overhead pipe goes into in the second shot.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...