Jump to content

Oh that wacky EA


Fletch

Recommended Posts

First, EA Montreal sends a letter to Ubisoft saying Ubisoft should treat their employees better...

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6143439.html

... and then EA lays off 5% of their workforce.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3147689

Wheel of Morality Moral Number 12: If you're going to fire off a public letter to take pot shots at your rival, coordinate it with the head office first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol...non-complete clauses are often bullshit. You have a right to work. People in this industry move in and out and around all the time. It's pretty hard to deny people the right to work, especially if you have specialized talents like game programming/art/design. So I agree with EA on that point.

As for laying off 5% of the work force...

Interesting that they laid off staff from studios all over. That implies that it was not a single project that was completed or folded, but rather EA was looking for ways to simply cut production cost across the board. So they thinned things out all over the company. Or it implies that a certain function within their studio system was trimmed and possibily centralized. I'm guessing it was really a cost issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubth that these clauses are legal. Everybody has a right to work and can free choose where he wants to work.

EA tried to hire 5 core people at the same time from the original splinter cell team a while back and that was the only time that Ubisoft enforced the clause. The whole thing was taken to court and the judge ruled in favor of Ubisoft.

As for the 5% and the affected EA studios, I have only heard reports about Vancouver, Tiburon and Redwood Shores being affected so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EA tried to hire 5 core people at the same time from the original splinter cell team a while back and that was the only time that Ubisoft enforced the clause. The whole thing was taken to court and the judge ruled in favor of Ubisoft.

Now as rumor has it, the guy who did this was the same guy who issued this letter, formerly an employee of Ubi? Is that correct? Because that makes it really funny.

From an outsider's perspective based on what I've seen here and elsewhere, it sounds like the clause is there only for fuckover attempts and almost all employees can do what they want without fear of legal issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are extremely valid in America. Almost every industry seems them in some forms. Pilots from certain airlines can't fly for other airlines for 3-6 months usually. Microsoft uses these for all their top people. The music industry slaps them on virtually every middle or top act. It's just good business insurance. It adds less incentive to quit for some other offer.

The only times they're usually voided is if they are poorly written, or if they are deemed excessive (like prohibitting you to work for a competitor for a full year or something where you would lose everything you own because you can't work).

As for the argument that it restricts your rights, that is essentially what any contract is. You agree to have certain rights restricted in order for compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Mapcore Supporters

    Our incredible Patreon supporters keep Mapcore's lights on. If you'd like to donate, check out our Patreon announcement.

    Note: This is brand new! The format will be tweaked and rolled out to more pages soon.

×
×
  • Create New...