Section_Ei8ht Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,3 ... 78,00.html APPLE'S IPOD PATENT GAFFE Computer firm Apple may have to pay Microsoft £6 for each iPod it sells after a huge licensing lapse. Lawyers at Bill Gates' firm filed a patent for technology behind the hugely successful digital music player two months before Apple. The US Patent Office has ruled that Microsoft has the right to charge competitors a licence fee for each iPod sold. Furious, Apple has said it will appeal the decision but at the moment it looks as though the firm will be paying a high price for the success of its product. The iPod was launched in November 2001 but Apple waited until July 2002 to file for a patent; Microsoft snuck in to license some of the technology the previous May. David Kaefer, Microsoft's director of intellectual property licensing, said it was open to letting other firms patent its innovations. He said: "In general, our policy is to allow others to license our patents so they can use our innovative methods in their products. "Microsoft and Apple have previously licensed their respective patent portfolios to one another and we maintain a good working relationship with Apple." The dispute comes days after Microsoft declared war on the iPod and pledged to come up with a series of rivals. So far, 21 million iPods have been sold worldwide, 18 million in the last year alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von*ferret Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 haha owned. I want one badly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanielAragon Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 as much as i hate to say it, i dont think pc will make any goos rivals...i dont like apple too much, but i love my ipod...thats the only thing i like about them...the ipod heh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bic-B@ll Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 \m/ iriver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazy Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 yikes D: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RD Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 "may" being the keyword Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skdr Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 I was JUST about to say that RD. It's a huge MAY in this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 Microsoft is best! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosmo Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 So no one finds it suspicious that MS filet the patent two months before Apple. I'm not saying who sold who what and who did industrial espionage over what in where, but I just don't get it who Apple was so "careless" not to check if the patent for one of their product is not colliding with THEIR BIGGEST RIVAL. And we all know Apple, they are like a 600 pound gorilla when it comes to patents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrik Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 Yes, it's important to remember that Apple are always Nazi little arses with their patents. It's totally hilarious to see them potentially enjoying their own medicine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mojo Posted August 17, 2005 Report Share Posted August 17, 2005 So far, 21 million iPods have been sold worldwide, 18 million in the last year alone. That doesn't even make sense. Sure its possible, but that is a shitload of iPods Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.