Bush "Troubled" by Gay Marriages in SF

[RD]

Anyways this is just my theory, not facts. I believe homosexuality is a mental issue, not a genetic inheritance.

i have my facts and u have ur beliefs keep them to urself but dont force it onto me!!!!!(¦)

[Guest John Kerry]

ATTENTION DD!!!!! AWNSER MY QUESTION

DD, i understand and i kinda agree with what your saying.. but i wanna ask you a question and see what you think... i know someone who has had like 2 or 3 kids... (i stoped counting after 1)... she was a total slut.. she would sleep with anything with a dick... her kids got taken away and put up in foster care.. now i know the person that got them, shes a good person, known her most of my life and she will probably make it far in life but lets say she likes women... what would you rather have... a kid that has a single mom that is a pimple on the ass of society living off food stamps and sleeping around... or a kid growing up in a nice home were they just happen to have 2 mommys or daddys...

[DD]

Anyways this is just my theory, not facts. I believe homosexuality is a mental issue, not a genetic inheritance.

i have my facts and u have ur beliefs keep them to urself but dont force it onto me!!!!!(¦)

Correction, you have your beliefs, I have my facts and beliefs I don't mean to force anything on to you.

Urban... I don't really know your lesbian friend. I personally would give her a mental evaluation before giving her a child. Then I would have people annually check on the child a lot at first, and less and less overtime. Finally, I'd also say its best to keep the child in a orphan home (so long as its not a christian home or quran!) for the time being, perhaps the child would be lucky enough to get adopted by a more traditional family. But if the child couldn't find a home after a short time period and the Lesbian checks out, then I think the child would be better under the guidance of a big ol bull dike rather than a crazy slut.

[Fletch]

well. i hereby give up every trying to argue with DD

[mawibse]

I meant natural in the form of giving birth. But yeah I can see how adoption is natural.

Natural, how so? (and don’t give me another stupid animal analogy)

And what do you mean by “natural�

To me that’s one of the stupidest words ever, who gives a shit if something is “natural†or not, besides hippies?

Using glasses is friggin unnatural, still you’re f*****g stupid if you don’t use them.

Because you don't have mental issues in the subject of sexual preference? Just think about it, how would a natural gay gene spread?

.. “natural gay gene� Lol!

You haven’t really thought about this much have you?

Think again how stuff in the genes “spreadâ€, what I thought was basic biology knowledge is that many things in you’re DNA lies dormant waiting for the right conditions to kick in.

There are pre sex age terminal illnesses and infertility that spread through the genes, it’s not like they appear every generation.

$hit I thought the big fuss about the “criminal†genes should have given it away, just because you have it doesn’t mean you’re a criminal just that the probability is much higher. The conditions must be met.

Geez this is low..

I don't exactly know how gay people would reproduce besides the fact that they would pretend to be straight for generation upon generation until now! Seem's unlikely to me.

It’s not like it’s unheard of, not even uncommon amongst them.

I know many cases where gay people have reproduced, guess you have to be clever to see how?

Just because you have an unusual sexual orientation doesn’t mean all other instincts are different.

But that's not a bad gene, and I'm not saying diversity is a bad thing. Please try to keep what I say in context, you seem to love misquoting me and taking what I say and totally screwing it up. I wouldn't really mind but your starting to make me look bad when its something I never said or even implied.

*desperately tries to find me quoting DD, and saying he says “diversity is a bad thingâ€*

Oh dear, I cant find any!!!

Oh god, he makes me look bad with something I never said or even implied!!!!

.. Seriously dude, wtf are you talking about??

… but since I’m in quotetopia:

I don't mind homosexuals, let them marry if they want, but I don't believe they should have children, why? I believe that homosexuality is completely mental (issues), not inherited.

What da f**k does if being gay is inherited or mental have to do with they should not have kids??? Logic?? *taps DD on the head* HELLO!!!!

if they can't form a baby naturally, well then they shouldn't have one. Harsh points, but very valid!

Valid? As in because it’s yours?

If they can’t have hearing naturally, well then they shouldn’t hear, harsh but valid!

… and retarded, lets remove that kind of elitist logic from the genepool.

best to keep the child in a orphan home (so long as its not a christian home or quran!) for the time being

… yeah an orphan home is a perfect place to spend a little extra time in, better then being with a rug eater or two who might infect the poor kid with impure, non reproducing, thoughts. I’m not being sarcastic! Naaah, in no way I tell you!

perhaps the child would be lucky enough to get adopted by a more traditional family.

That is not a Christian family I presume, perhaps not any kind of religion? Traditional my ass!

I believe the more and more able bodied, healthy, productive humans exist, the better our society could be.

I see you left out smart/intelligent, which gives me a hint that you also want to be in this better “more able bodied, healthy, productive human†society of yours.

Not that I’d want you’re horror for a better society but I don’t see why homos can’t be “more able bodied, healthy and productive�? I guess they don’t fit you’re image of a “better†society?

*shudders*

and I'm not saying diversity is a bad thing

….. If you remove everything you don’t like from the gene pool (making all more able bodied, healthy and productive) you think you’d make it more diverse???

No!

Yes!

[Guest The_Postman]

INTERNET POLITICAL DISCUSSION #2578972586

RESULTS: Both parties refuse to budge.

PAST RESULTS (in all internet political discussions): Both parties refuse to budge.

[mikezilla]

i think posteh is wrong.

discuss.

[Guest The_Postman]

I have yet to hear one good reason why gays should not be allowed to marry each other. Basically, I'm hearing these arguments.

1. Gays are going against nature.

This is like saying "OMG LEFT-HANDED PEOPLE ARE UNNATURAL". No dipshit, they're just in the minority.

2. Gays can't have children, therefore they should not marry.

What exactly does the ability to produce offspring have to do with entering into a committed lifelong relationship with someone you love and being able to have access to the many advantages of marriage? Less fucktards in my way is just fine with me.

3. Gay marriage is wrong because it makes God cry.

Well why don't we go ahead and ban atheist marriages too shitcock. Religions don't have a monopoly on the institution of marriage.

Seriously, what is the strongest argument for not allowing same-sex marriage? Nothing I've heard comes close to being logical. It just seems like a bunch of bigoted "OMG IT MAKES ME UNCOMFORTABLE" arguments.

[RD]

the koran says homosexuality is a sin

they can marry, have kids, do evrything they want. Only god is allowed to stop them, and humans can point them to the koran

[Guest The_Postman]

Okay, if the Koran thing is a joke, it's wearing very very thin.

[DD]

Beh. People against the marrage should be put in gas chambers.

Mawisbe, I'm not even going to bother reading all your bullshit, you talk to much, STFU. You took pretty much everything I said and misinterpreted it. You also contradict yourself far too much. My point: I don't care what you have to say.

[mawibse]

Beh. People against the marrage should be put in gas chambers.

Whatever not believing in marrage are I bet it’s worth a trip to DD’s concentration camp.

Mawisbe

... silly willy, its mawibse! :roll:

I'm not even going to bother reading all your bullshit, you talk to much, STFU.

Warping you’re fragile little mind am I?

You took pretty much everything I said and misinterpreted it.

As if. You pretty much suck at explaining what you mean then, that or you change you’re mind all the time.

You also contradict yourself far too much.

Yes I don’t!

My point: I don't care what you have to say.

... that sounds like something you’d say after realizing you’d loose the discussion.. Not that you'd care...

*BWAWK CHICKEN BWAWK!*

[Taylor]

The problem people (at least Bush) have with gay marriage is nothing to do with people hating gays in the slightest. It has nothing to do with them being able to bare children, or warp their children or the fact it, apparently, goes against nature.

It's because of religion, I know we have lots of trendy net atheists here who like to constantly, and ironically, state how other peoples beliefs are lesser to theirs, but that's kind of moot. marriage takes place in a big chapel, is carried out by priest and the vows are read out of a Holy Writ in front of a big statue of Jesus. Cock and bum fun is against Christian beliefs, so a country allowing gays to go in their to get married is going to anger a lot of people; especially the Church which isn't exactly a group of people you want to piss off.

While most people accept gays and have nothing against them, whether or not they should be able to marry is still very-much open for debate and it does not make people homophobic or close-minded.

[Fletch]

especially the Church which isn't exactly a group of people you want to piss off.

but my life would be so dull if i didn't have the church to piss off

[Taylor]

As long as you're not in a position such as world leader, it's a-ok.