Large signature images?

[chips]

Urgh, this forum has only just started, and I'm already seeing signatures that take up half my screen >_<

So, who's up for a limit? It's not like you arent going to be able to express your artistic skill and saving my bandwidth/screenspace at the same time.

note: Size mentioned in poll is just an example, but something close to that.

[CrazyMAC]

400*130 wud be nice but i voted top one anyway

[FrieChamp]

Right Chips, your enormous signature has offended me for long enough by now

Na seriously, 360x90 or something around that should be big enough.

[Guest John Kerry]

mines 403x138 and im not gonna change it.. but i do belive we should set SOME kind of rules for screen filling sigs..

edit: changed it a little.. made some parts transparent

[CrazyMAC]

see mines and urbans are ruffly the same soooo i have come to the conclusion that this is the most common size ~

/me runs far far away

[KidDynamite]

ya, i kinda like the 400x130 rule thats a nice size, then again i don't even have a sig so not like it matters to me lol. but i hate seeing like 250x700 sigs so annoying.

[engineer]

fuck you all

[Mazy]

purn the imaged plz

[OL]

big signatures are pone

[Guest The_Postman]

purn the imaged plz

Pazl

[JynxDaddy]

big sigs sux, just wait for everyone to get good sigs then yeh

[Guest John Kerry]

your saying my sig aint good?

[JynxDaddy]

all them stupid big sigs have to go, and crazy mac needs a bettar one that isnt just a block a green D:

[CrazyMAC]

:\ its not a block of green just your puter can't view PNG's coz u uber suck like ol and plz mine is a dynamic sig....just not very dynamic atm

[OL]

:\ its not a block of green just your puter can't view PNG's coz u uber suck like ol and plz mine is a dynamic sig....just not very dynamic atm

shhh