Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Then u agree ur own opinion is ignorant. U might think the movie deserves 4,5 stars, but me and the rest of the internet isnt u.

Your saying all others on the internet besides me agree with you? You have proven my point.

And just for the record, I give it 5 out of 5.

No thats not what im saying. When judging a movie u dont just think of ur own opinion. U like it and give it 5 stars, but this has nothing to do with the movie really deserving it. Ur overlooking its obvious flaws becaus u liked the tripod sounds or somthing or u think u understand spielbergs deeper meaning. But u shouldnt have to read the original novel or investigate spielbergs motives to enjoy it.

This movie will definitely not go down history as a classic or a masterpiece. A 4 or 5 star movie is a classic masterpiece.

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Then u agree ur own opinion is ignorant. U might think the movie deserves 4,5 stars, but me and the rest of the internet isnt u.

Your saying all others on the internet besides me agree with you? You have proven my point.

And just for the record, I give it 5 out of 5.

No thats not what im saying. When judging a movie u dont just think of ur own opinion. U like it and give it 5 stars, but this has nothing to do with the movie really deserving it. Ur overlooking its obvious flaws becaus u liked the tripod sounds or somthing or u think u understand spielbergs deeper meaning. But u shouldnt have to read the original novel or investigate spielbergs motives to enjoy it.

This movie will definitely not go down history as a classic or a masterpiece. A 4 or 5 star movie is a classic masterpiece.

Who needs to award arbitrary scores to everything anyway? Films, games, music - all an experience rather than something maths can handle. Every single person will feel differently about every single thing, some more so than others.

Posted

Then u agree ur own opinion is ignorant. U might think the movie deserves 4,5 stars, but me and the rest of the internet isnt u.

Your saying all others on the internet besides me agree with you? You have proven my point.

And just for the record, I give it 5 out of 5.

No thats not what im saying. When judging a movie u dont just think of ur own opinion. U like it and give it 5 stars, but this has nothing to do with the movie really deserving it. Ur overlooking its obvious flaws becaus u liked the tripod sounds or somthing or u think u understand spielbergs deeper meaning. But u shouldnt have to read the original novel or investigate spielbergs motives to enjoy it.

This movie will definitely not go down history as a classic or a masterpiece. A 4 or 5 star movie is a classic masterpiece.

Like I said before, my opinion is totally non-biased.

Posted

worst line of the movie was probably

IS IT TERRORISTS=!=!=!=!?!??!?!

I wanted to get up and leave right then and there. Pathetic.

what do you think a 10 year old girl would ask if the city's are blowing up? especially an american one?

it's clever.

Posted

Best line is like (i dont remember exactly)

TOM: This is from someplace else

SON: U mean like Europe

TOM: NO xxx(sum name i forgot), not Europe!

Evrybody laughed in the cinema there (because were all from europe). Also when Tom threw a ball thru his window and a peanut butter slice of bread on another window were great and had most ppl laughing, including me

Posted

worst line of the movie was probably

IS IT TERRORISTS=!=!=!=!?!??!?!

I wanted to get up and leave right then and there. Pathetic.

This is exactly what I meant by people clinging to the most irrelevant parts of a movie and then kind of "give up" on the film. Pathetic.

Posted

Evrybody laughed in the cinema there (because were all from europe). Also when Tom threw a ball thru his window and a peanut butter slice of bread on another window were great and had most ppl laughing, including me

Yeah, got the same laughs at the same parts here.

Posted

Likewise :) I enjoyed the film but its not a classic. Its an entertaining diversion, but it doesn't leave much of a lasting impression. Too many occasions in which Mr.Cruise NEARLY lost his life, and every time there was some sort of line or barrier, him and his family were ALWAYS at the front. It was too much "him him him" - why did it have to be him he spotted the birds resting on the tripod, or him that used the grenades to destroy one? Why did it have to be him and his family alone that made it into Tim Robbin's basement, or had a working car? How everything around the plane wreck was destroyed...except their working car? Just a bit too contrived, conincidental, and overall too damn lucky for the family.

So yeah, enjoyable, but I think people are trying to turn it into something it isn't by making it out to be some sort of classic.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...