Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm using the UE4 FPS template as a base. According to its scale, 256 x 256 x 256 in UT1 translates to roughly 500 x 500 x 500 in UE4.

Collision and lightmaps in this current state are completely screwed. I made some basic BSP prototype and converted to static meshes. This conversion step causes a lot of issues with lightmaps and collision.

UE4 with a 1366 x 768 screen isn't good. It has so many menus and windows that you really need two screens to work properly with it.

Ideas for UE4 version:

- 3D trims
- Flickering light effect for all tourches
- Water caustics. Not raytracing, just some cool projected texture
- Textures now can have displacement, normals, Physically Based
- Higher triangle count, mostly due to round columns and trim

https://postimg.cc/gallery/cs04sd3

Clipboard01.jpg

Clipboard02.jpg

Clipboard03.jpg

A bit of achitectural research

texture-1.png

texture-wall.png

How-to-Add-Character-and-Charm-to-Boring

117588583-antique-white-columns-roman-co

texture-floor.png

 

Edited by 0kelvin
Posted (edited)

Untitled-1.jpg

I've learned the very basics to model the basic shapes in blender. Still have to master boolean operations though.

In UT I was limited to 8 - 16 sided cylinders, in UE4 I'm going up to 64.

IT's much easier to work with multiples of ten than with powers of two.

Edited by 0kelvin
Posted
21 hours ago, 0kelvin said:

Untitled-1.jpg

I've learned the very basics to model the basic shapes in blender. Still have to master boolean operations though.

In UT I was limited to 8 - 16 sided cylinders, in UE4 I'm going up to 64.

IT's much easier to work with multiples of ten than with powers of two.

Cool progress!

I've worked with both grid styles (multiples of ten or powers of two), and I prefer powers of two, because it breaks down nicely:

8 - 4 - 2 - 1 - 0.5 - 0.25 - 0.125

Whereas with 5, you get a lot of broken numbers:

5 - 2.5 - 1.25 - 0.625 etc...

Posted

arch.jpg

circular.jpg

dome.jpg

I decided to get rid of the middle ramp because it feels out of place. It was then that I realized that the syymmetrical design feels better suited for CTF, not FFA. I decided to remove the middle bridge as well.

Posted (edited)

new4.jpg

Placeholder material and some trim.

The symmetric design of this map makes it a good place to use the modern modular approach.

The columns were going to be square, but after some research I decided to make round columns. I'm going to bevel the arches too.

door-church-door-input-ornament-portal-o

termos-da-arquitetura-abadia.jpg

Edited by 0kelvin
Posted (edited)

Square where the trims meet.

trim-block.jpg


preview8.jpg


previe10.jpg

Not sure. A statue fills up that dead end nicely.
preview9.jpg


preview11.jpg

preview14.jpg

Not sure about the ceiling. I can have 3 circular relief decorations or just one. The ceiling can be flat, or half flat, half curved.
preview12.jpg


preview13.jpg

 

Edited by 0kelvin
Posted

preview17.jpg

preview18.jpg

preview19.jpg

I'm trying to learn how to make materials. Smooth faces makes the lighting soft, but the angle is still not right. The texture maps, including the normal maps, are stretched because I'm having a hard time with UV maps.

Posted (edited)

Cool, good luck with the materials! 
Must say the second screenshot doesn't look right to me. Wood is sort of an unexpected material in among all the stone of this type of building. So I went back and checked your reference images. If you want to use wood, probably try and avoid sandwiching it between those black trims. That makes the entire area feel tight. Instead do something like this reference you showed:

MFTHK3.jpg.dfa6eef6739e65e38ba1627f1f9102ec.jpg

There is only wood for floor and walls and then a clean cut with a wooden trim to the white of the ceilings. Also I would suggest reducing the tile size of the individual panels. Again, I like the small shapes of this image.
Keep it up! 

Edited by Freaky_Banana
Refernece
Posted (edited)

That texture isn't wood. It's stretched because the UV is wrong.depositphotos_94503786-stock-photo-grung

I just realized that smooth stone surface doesn't match "ancient". My map is more similar to the American Museum of Natural History than to the Pantheon.

Untitled-2.jpg

I think that tourches aren't going to be bright enough. Every photo of a corridor with tourches on walls look way too dark.

Edited by 0kelvin
  • 1 year later...
Posted

I just realized that I made a mistake in this map that is going to result in me scrapping it.

I over-focused on the architecture and now that I'm looking at the floorplan, I didn't notice that the corridors are too narrow. The gameplay is not going to work because the player's flow is very bad. Not only that, I misjudged how complicated the architecture would be and honestly, it's not something I would be able to do.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Mapcore Supporters

    aphexjh       Badroenis       celery⭐      EGO DEATH ⭐      Freaky_Banana      FMPONE ⭐      Harry Godden      JimWood ⭐      JSadones      poLemin      Vaya

    Funds go towards hosting and license costs, Discord server boosts, and more. If you'd like to donate, check out our Patreon announcement.

×
×
  • Create New...