Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone!

This is my entry for the contest, a 5v5 competitive bomb defusal map. 

It is set around an abandoned Victorian Lunatic Asylum in the UK.

Screenshots:

Spoiler

 

3w9GcX0.jpgZUhZcle.jpg00cCrhP.jpgLcXBjhY.jpg6nqDJ43.jpgOf6WzRY.jpgF3VRTRY.jpgbWDxDxW.jpgBfXoCRk.jpg0pjGXWv.jpgHw2Mjqi.jpg

Steam Workshop Link :

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=864761519

 

I intend to keep improving the map after the contest, and would appreciate your opinion and feedback!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The overall aesthetic is really good. It feels like old Victorian architecture.

However, I do feel you've missed a trick, your overall brush work is really pleasing, but theres a lot of opportunity to add detail to the plain, flat and boring walls that are everywhere. some variation in texture and maybe some adornments like drain pipes and the like. 

Overall really nice! Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Ridders said:

The overall aesthetic is really good. It feels like old Victorian architecture.

However, I do feel you've missed a trick, your overall brush work is really pleasing, but theres a lot of opportunity to add detail to the plain, flat and boring walls that are everywhere. some variation in texture and maybe some adornments like drain pipes and the like. 

Overall really nice! Good luck.

Thank you! 

I agree that there is a lot of potential for detail, and specially due to the whole map happening around one main, big, building of similar texture, it is good to have some variation on the patterns.

Unfortunately I did not have enough time to do everything I wanted. It is definitely something I want to take a closer look after the competition. 

I appreciate your feedback! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theme, brush work and overall look is good. Your pathing is good and has purpose save for a few places (see below) but have you play tested it? I ran around in it today and here's some thoughts if you will (with pics):

-Long A is bit too long. One CT with an awp and full utility can lock down what is otherwise the complete right side of the map and pick the terrorists apart. For the T's it's a heavy investment map control wise and with A halls so close by it's a much more manageable route to the site. You need to find a way to add an extra dimension to Long A or shorten it to incentivize the terrorists to go there.

-Mid ends in a weird way. There's a sign that points to A but it's just a weird ladder thing that's easily punishable by the CT's and the B connector at the end does not create an alternate route. Rework lower Mid so that it rewards the T's for taking this area. 

-CT routes could use some imagination. There's only one way to rotate into B not counting heaven which has limited cover and is pretty exposed. Find a way to make these more dynamic and connect them to lower Mid.

Hope this helps. Looking forward to seeing more!

20171206224609_1.jpg

20171206224718_1.jpg

20171206224648_1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, DRZ said:

Theme, brush work and overall look is good. Your pathing is good and has purpose save for a few places (see below) but have you play tested it? I ran around in it today and here's some thoughts if you will (with pics):

-Long A is bit too long. One CT with an awp and full utility can lock down what is otherwise the complete right side of the map and pick the terrorists apart. For the T's it's a heavy investment map control wise and with A halls so close by it's a much more manageable route to the site. You need to find a way to add an extra dimension to Long A or shorten it to incentivize the terrorists to go there.

-Mid ends in a weird way. There's a sign that points to A but it's just a weird ladder thing that's easily punishable by the CT's and the B connector at the end does not create an alternate route. Rework lower Mid so that it rewards the T's for taking this area. 

-CT routes could use some imagination. There's only one way to rotate into B not counting heaven which has limited cover and is pretty exposed. Find a way to make these more dynamic and connect them to lower Mid.

Hope this helps. Looking forward to seeing more!

20171206224609_1.jpg

20171206224718_1.jpg

20171206224648_1.jpg

 

Thanks for the feedback.

 

-I have playtested the map a few times, but this version of the layout was not. The most recent change was the connection from mid to A. That is the reason it ends in a "weird" way, there was an idea to change it to the way it is here, but I couldn't actually test it. Here is a radar view of the earlier version. 

Spoiler

a14Jcfr.jpg

 

-Long A is long, but CTs don't have a lot of cover, I think they can get slowly pushed back to site by the Ts with the use of grenades. Short A and Long A work together to give alternative routes to the site with shorter and longer fire ranges.  It is a flank heavy map, so both teams need to be aware of that, either commit to a push or slowly retreat to safer positions.  But, maybe different angles from the entrances to A are not worth the utility? (do you think they are not rewarding for a split A?)

-Back to mid, as I mentioned, it was changed recently and I couldn't playtest it. It is a very risky path for the Ts to got up the ladder, but they can split both A and B site from the back, it is also very powerful. I need to playtest this layout, but one idea is to connect ladder to B and change/remove alternate mid and the second entrance to B. It is a big change an would make the layout more "standard".

-It is and interesting idea to change the CTs entrances to B and also connecting them with lower mid. Similar to an idea I had, but more dynamic I think it is worth a test.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think those are good ideas. Also, I think the earlier version of A is with the connection from Mid to A feels better. Move the A Long connector entrance up closer to where the driveway swings right, and now the CT's have another angle to worry about rotating T's. I think this will put emphasis on the angle into the site and solidify that choke point.

Happy to help with play testing or anything else if you need just drop me a message.

Also, congrats!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×