Sprony Posted December 13, 2016 Report Posted December 13, 2016 This site is great: https://corrupt.af/ It simple lists every corrupt little thing going down. A great way to keep track of things since not a day goes by without an update. It stands for Corrupt As Fuck btw. Here's a little bit: Quote Among those considered for the post, Mr. Tillerson has perhaps the closest ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, having negotiated a 2012 energy partnership deal with Russia that Mr. Putin said could eventually be worth as much as $500 billion. In 2012, the Kremlin bestowed the country’s Order of Friendship decoration on Mr. Tillerson. […] Exxon has a large global presence, but this could introduce sticky conflicts of interest if Mr. Tillerson is selected. The company explores for oil and gas on six of the world’s continents and has operations in more than 50 countries. Mr. Tillerson, who is slated to retire next year, has a pension worth tens of millions of dollars, a value that could potentially be affected by State Department activities. For example, he could benefit from such potential department actions as the lifting of sanctions on Russia. Quote
D3ads Posted December 14, 2016 Author Report Posted December 14, 2016 Hmmm.. I'd take that site with salt, it's run by ex-Clinton campaign staffer Matt Ortega who couldn't possibly have an agenda, no doubt he's had some generous donations from the likes of George Soros at some point... In terms of Tillerson, I don't know much about the guy but he's an oil giant who's claimed he's out to make money in everything he does. It might surprise people here to hear this from me (or not) but whilst I'm all for having good relations for Russia and ending the standoff situation that exists currently... appointing a guy who received a medal of friendship from Putin is probably a step too far... Quote
Vorontsov Posted December 14, 2016 Report Posted December 14, 2016 4 hours ago, D3ads said: appointing a guy who received a medal of friendship from Putin is probably a step too far... It's just a prank bro D3ads and Jetsetlemming 2 Quote
D3ads Posted December 17, 2016 Author Report Posted December 17, 2016 Bwahaha.. sums it all up nicely.. "we're not asking for you to vote for Hillary Clinton" except.. yes.. yes you are. Wtf Saul.. no calling on you again! Sentura and Lizard 2 Quote
Vorontsov Posted December 17, 2016 Report Posted December 17, 2016 The opinion of a celebrity is going to sway anyone with self-respect? Buddy 1 Quote
Sprony Posted December 18, 2016 Report Posted December 18, 2016 23 hours ago, Vorontsov said: The opinion of a celebrity is going to sway anyone with self-respect? Well the Democrats certainly believed that Quote
Lizard Posted December 22, 2016 Report Posted December 22, 2016 2 hours ago, (HP) said: This is either a good joke or someone is really really stupid. Quote
-HP- Posted December 22, 2016 Report Posted December 22, 2016 https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/donald-trump-says-he-wants-to-greatly-strengthen-and-expand-us-nuclear-capabilitiy-a-radical-break-from-us-foreign-policy/2016/12/22/52745c22-c86e-11e6-85b5-76616a33048d_story.html?utm_term=.0e589b2a753c Someone didn't watch Dr Strangelove, because yeah we definitely need to be able to have the capacity to obliterate the world 2000x instead of our current lousy 1800x. I can't believe this demagogue is supposed to be the leader of the free world, and what I also can't believe is that there's people out there who think he's what the western world needs right now, right... I'm likely one of the most positive guys you'll ever met, and I can't shake the feeling that with this kind of thinking our civilization is fucked! Quote
El Moroes Posted December 22, 2016 Report Posted December 22, 2016 Each news about this man sounds like a joke...and is unfortunately not. That's crazy. Quote
Vorontsov Posted December 22, 2016 Report Posted December 22, 2016 Should have been Rand Paul, been rooting for him & his father since forever. Too bad he got taken out so early. Quote
Sentura Posted December 22, 2016 Report Posted December 22, 2016 On 12/17/2016 at 8:31 PM, Vorontsov said: The opinion of a celebrity is going to sway anyone with self-respect? I think you underestimate how many people have no self respect Vorontsov and Vaya 2 Quote
Minos Posted December 22, 2016 Report Posted December 22, 2016 What a beautiful world... https://www.thestreet.com/story/13935799/1/uranium-resources-shares-rise-as-trump-putin-vow-to-boost-nuclear-capability.html Quote
D3ads Posted December 23, 2016 Author Report Posted December 23, 2016 (edited) OH MY GOD AMERICA AND RUSSIA HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!! ..this isn't news, the hysteria isn't based on any situation that hasn't been the case during and after the Cold War. As usual MSM (especially the Washington Times, which is essentially hyperbole clickbait since the election) have taken an angle on this to make it sound as terrible as possible. Here's the thing you might miss if you're not paying attention... It's actually an anti-proliferation message. Quote The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes. In other words, until the whole world realises what should be common sense that nuclear weapons are a bad thing and that they should be scrapped, the US must strengthen it's arsenal just as Russia and other countries continue to do so. This makes sense given that much of the nuclear arsenal that the US has is aging, same with Russia. I agree with anyone that nuclear weapons are horrific and I'm all for them being scrapped but it will only happen when the whole world gets together to do it. People in this country like Corbyn want to get rid of our nuclear capabilities, but it's absolutely crazy to do so when a rogue state like North Korea is seeking to construct ICBMs... As for that video about how Trump is going to take over the media, it's not quite as idiotic as "2017 New Years Resolutions for White Guys" but it's close.. Btw.. for all this bs surrounding "fake news", this article is an eye opener: http://nypost.com/2016/12/22/the-fake-news-epidemic-that-doesnt-get-denounced/ We had the same crap following brexit, claims that hate crimes were on the rise. Only "hate crimes" can literally be someone reporting being offended by something Farage said on the television, or what people said in a conversation on the street. So whilst hate crimes obviously do exist, the data is skewed and some of it never even happened. Edited December 23, 2016 by D3ads Vorontsov 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.