Jump to content
MadsenFK

[CS:GO] Riverside (WIP)

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Shibou said:

Looks nice so far, but what happened to the other map? :D

I really didn't like the theme that we were going for on that map, and if we were gonna change that up, it would require a lot of work (I'm a bit lazy tbh)

Choosing two themes in one map was a bit hard for us to accomplish.

And I also didn't really enjoy myself when I was mapping.

 

and thanks!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I mainly played mid in the playtest I can only really comment on this area.

Mid played poorly in my opinion. As a CT it was difficult to hold, even with a perfect smoke down. Once T's had gotten mid there was no way to retake it, since T's can also use the route from their way onto A. The open drop towards CT spawn further established T's dominance in mid.

Kind of a nitpick here, but both ways from mid towards A and B leads to a drop-zone on the site. This isn't really an issue, but feels a bit samey.

Keep the work up! :) Logic out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/6/2016 at 11:16 AM, Logic said:

Since I mainly played mid in the playtest I can only really comment on this area.

Mid played poorly in my opinion. As a CT it was difficult to hold, even with a perfect smoke down. Once T's had gotten mid there was no way to retake it, since T's can also use the route from their way onto A. The open drop towards CT spawn further established T's dominance in mid.

Kind of a nitpick here, but both ways from mid towards A and B leads to a drop-zone on the site. This isn't really an issue, but feels a bit samey.

Keep the work up! :) Logic out!

You're right, it did play pretty poorly. I already have an idea in mind that might work out, so I'll do some work here this weekend.

Thanks! :)

On 12/6/2016 at 11:00 PM, rosk said:

I didn't like some features of B so here's what I would change:

fLRUEBF.jpg

I'll try that! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello people.

It's been little over a month now, and I've pretty much just taken a break from map making overall. But a lot still has changed since the last update (just details actually)

Next update will be released very soon, since I still need to pack the files and get it compiled.

EDIT: Well, compile fucking failed. Stuck on PortalFlow: 9... for over 2 hours now. Last compile in total was only 1½ hours which was yesterday.

 
Edited by madsenfk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/9/2016 at 9:06 AM, madsenfk said:

Hello people.

It's been little over a month now, and I've pretty much just taken a break from map making overall. But a lot still has changed since the last update (just details actually)

Next update will be released very soon, since I still need to pack the files and get it compiled.

EDIT: Well, compile fucking failed. Stuck on PortalFlow: 9... for over 2 hours now. Last compile in total was only 1½ hours which was yesterday.

 

Minimal optimization pass would fix that for you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9.10.2016 at 3:06 PM, madsenfk said:

EDIT: Well, compile fucking failed. Stuck on PortalFlow: 9... for over 2 hours now. Last compile in total was only 1½ hours which was yesterday.

Don't worry, we had the same thing for oakwood. Our compile times jumped from 45 minutes to four hours within two days of detailwork. Just run the compile in CompilePalX. That won't lag your computer, so you're free to do anything during compile time (although of course, the more you do, the more time your compile will take). For us the compile took around 4 hours (approximated 2 and a half of which were spent on PortalFlow 9...).

We hope this helps :) !

Cheers!

Edited by Freaky_Banana

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now when I look around, not much has actually changed in terms of details.

Wires has more slack, some small inaccessible areas and stuff.

But oh well. If you want to check it out then go ahead.

(btw, the radar was made in a hurry, so that's why It's not that good)

Download

Have some screenshots:

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

Is this enough slack?

Edited by madsenfk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from what i can see from the screenshots i think the map looks solid with interesting angles. one thing what the map could maybe use is a landmark or something that makes the map visually more unique like the empire building does in de_empire or the chinatown area in de_chinatown.looking forward to its progression  :v

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...