mawibse Posted January 21, 2005 Report Posted January 21, 2005 I dont pick the easy ones, the Iraqis do. If they want to live between carbombs then its fine by me, but right now not even the suicidebombers want to live like that I'm a bit dense but I'll try to decipher what you posted; You are not taking the easy one by not caring if the Iraq invasion was good or bad, but the Iraqis are. The Iraqi population and even the suicide bombers don’t want to live like that but if they did it would be fine by you. *meep meep wooosh* Well you’re too clever for me cause your cho cho train of thoughts missed my station.
de@Gle Posted August 1, 2005 Report Posted August 1, 2005 Although it was stupid to go into Iraq with not even enough evidence of WMD, it was still a step in the war on terror. Sort of. :-/ Also, uh I was wondering the other day. Why does suicide bombers somtimes target Iraqi civilians? Don't they want to target the US? Its the civilians fault that the US took over Iraq. Why should they pay the price? I just don't understand... I don't like these guerillas and terrorists running Iraq either but you know what, thats just a matter of opinion, guess you pick the easy ones to care for eh? I dont pick the easy ones, the Iraqis do. If they want to live between carbombs then its fine by me, but right now not even the suicidebombers want to live like that I dont think suicide bombers want to live at all. :-x
Kosmo Posted August 1, 2005 Report Posted August 1, 2005 Although it was stupid to go into Iraq with not even enough evidence of WMD, it was still a step in the war on terror. Sort of. :-/ Yes, a step for the worse, and the London bombing only proofs that, the terrorists all around the world are even more pissed now than they were earlier, the fact that USA and it's faction of ouf of control military powers, spearheaded by some of the most idiotic men in the history of politicians and their inane decisions of locations to attack on their "war on terror" is just a proof that they are just targetting muslims and the terrorists counter it with targetting anything remotely western and christian. Also, uh I was wondering the other day. Why does suicide bombers somtimes target Iraqi civilians? Don't they want to target the US? Its the civilians fault that the US took over Iraq. Why should they pay the price? I just don't understand... You should consider thinking more about the word 'terrorist' and and less about 'rebel on the path on setting his people free from tyranny'.
de@Gle Posted August 6, 2005 Report Posted August 6, 2005 No I mean like. ok. Iraqi civilians were there before U.S. The terrorist dont want them to leave, just the U.S. I just don't see the point in terrorizing the people of Iraq when you'd think they'd target Americans. I don't know was just somthing I was pondering this. Well the whole "War on Terror" started with 9/11 (For Bush anyway.) sort of. Again I cant really say for I dont watch enough CNN or FOX.
Kosmo Posted August 6, 2005 Report Posted August 6, 2005 No I mean like. ok. Iraqi civilians were there before U.S. The terrorist dont want them to leave, just the U.S. I just don't see the point in terrorizing the people of Iraq when you'd think they'd target Americans. I don't know was just somthing I was pondering this. Yeah, I know what you are meaning, and it just confuses me too, why attack other muslims to get to the US/Nato troops. But what I think it means, is basically, they are creating civil unrest to make it harder for US/Nato troops to seize and control an area, like how'd you control total anarchy? AND the another idiotic brainchild of some not so intelligent terrorist warmonger, thinks that all civilians living in IRAQ are "supporting" the invaders because they let them control the country and are not starting a rebellion, and actually submitting to the "rigged" election of the invading force. Or so certain Aljazeera news network can inform us, and frankly, Aljazeera has been the only thing anywhere near the truth during this whole time, which is kinda sad. Well the whole "War on Terror" started with 9/11 (For Bush anyway.) sort of. Again I cant really say for I dont watch enough CNN or FOX. What 9/11 basically did, was it made the whole "War on Terror" a way for Bush to lauch for political rockstardom, and made a small CIA mission in to a global scale public circus. We should not forget that this whole "War on Terror" has been going for well over 20 years, and it was ran by CIA officials and it has had several campaigns through the globe during it's time.
Recommended Posts