Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I really don't think it looks that great. I understand they're going for a 80s, VHS vibe, but it just looks overwhemingly colourful, and not in a nice way. It's kinda hard to see what's going on.

photo-thumb-14442.jpg?_r=1365634750

PS I TOTALLY GET WHERE YOU ARE COMING FROM

Same here. I love it, but I would love it even more if I could see what was happening.

Posted (edited)

I would take this over FC3 any day.

For the art? Because gameplay seems perfectly the same, probably leaning much more toward shooting but looks just like a re-skinning.

While the art, as I said, I like it; I'm annoyed by some animations that look choppy and I'm not a huge fan of gratuitous offensive animation+sentences (i'm afraid they'll be quite repetetive instead of punctuation marks).

Besides its a standalone experiement to get them different style of games, taking risks, etc. By using the FC3 name, which I said before, I assume is the only way to generate enough attention to do so

I totally get that, but can you blame me because it pisses me off? :) I'm feeling cheated, as well as lots of gamers posting elsewhere.

I personally encourage spin-offs, but I like consistent and cohesive experiences, not blatant commercial operations. But maybe on the flip side, some execs there are thinking they are being straight with us "look, this is the same game reskinned, we tell you, you know it". Either case, this doesn't seem to me going so far as taking real risks. (Talking as a gamer here.)

Edited by blackdog
Posted (edited)

I would take this over FC3 any day.

For the art? Because gameplay seems perfectly the same, probably leaning much more toward shooting but looks just like a re-skinning.

While the art, as I said, I like it; I'm annoyed by some animations that look choppy and I'm not a huge fan of gratuitous offensive animation+sentences (i'm afraid they'll be quite repetetive instead of punctuation marks).

Besides its a standalone experiement to get them different style of games, taking risks, etc. By using the FC3 name, which I said before, I assume is the only way to generate enough attention to do so

I totally get that, but can you blame me because it pisses me off? :) I'm feeling cheated, as well as lots of gamers posting elsewhere.

I personally encourage spin-offs, but I like consistent and cohesive experiences, not blatant commercial operations. But maybe on the flip side, some execs there are thinking they are being straight with us "look, this is the same game reskinned, we tell you, you know it". Either case, this doesn't seem to me going so far as taking real risks. (Talking as a gamer here.)

Not blaming you for anything, just explaining, because I know, the reasons it got made.

Edited by Dark
Posted

What the hell is that anyway? a DLC? But it looks like a new game. wtf, I am confused.

Edit: Okay, I shouldnt ask stupid questions before looking anything up! Gawd, this looks pretty fucking badass, I really wanna play FC3 so bad, but I need to finish Tomb Raider first, can't wait, this is looking killer!

Posted (edited)

a friend is playing the leaked version. Seems a pretty complete version indeed! he said that is amazing shooter. And make some jokes of nowadays shooters' lame tutorials and lame storyline, etc...

And you guys saw that the pre order is already avaliable on steam right? probably ubi was forced to release it early.

The ost is rad

https://soundcloud.com/powerglove

Edited by Thurnip

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...