e-freak Posted February 15, 2011 Report Posted February 15, 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12453422 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12446405 the test is on it's highpoint right now Can't wait until this becomes real! Quote
Serenius Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 Sweetness! One step closer to opening a gateway to hell on Mars. Quote
dux Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 "But there isn't enough money" Space flight and exploration shouldn't cost money, this is going to be our salvation one day I think. The sooner they can do stuff without the constraints of a stupid budget, the better. Quote
Thrik Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 Well someone needs to make all the stuff they need, so the money needs to come from somewhere — whether that be paying the company that supplies the UltraRocket2000 metal or the guy who has to dig the ore out in the first place. Until everyone is willing to work for free it'll never be costless. Which is a shame because I really want to go cruise some galaxies. Quote
dux Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 Just get it all from china, they work for peanuts. Or they can get the first go in the rocket ship. Quote
-HP- Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 Just make sure you don't hire a certain Doctor Betruger for the expedition. Quote
Minos Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 The day Russia lands the first men on Mars will be the best day of D3ad's life. Quote
Sentura Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 Sweetness! One step closer to opening a gateway to hell on Mars. you mean so we can find the mass effect gate and get the hell out of here right Quote
the0rthopaedicsurgeon Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 "But there isn't enough money" Space flight and exploration shouldn't cost money, this is going to be our salvation one day I think. The sooner they can do stuff without the constraints of a stupid budget, the better. The Apollo programme made back $14 for every dollar the US spent on it. They probably wouldn't get back so much these days because it was all totally new at the time, but you'd make so much money from a mission to Mars (and eventually asteroid mining, I think one asteroid contains several times the USA's total wealth in raw materials). The problem is that the money would be made through jobs, research etc which wouldn't be obvious to the public. That's why they waste money sending people into orbit to do pointless experiments on the ISS, because it's the easiest way for NASA to show they're actually spending their (tiny) budget on something. Quote
Seldoon182 Posted February 19, 2011 Report Posted February 19, 2011 I'm pretty sure USA will landing on mars before the Russian! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VASIMR 29 days with this technology instead of 8 mouths! Quote
e-freak Posted February 19, 2011 Author Report Posted February 19, 2011 problem is - on both sides of the fence they rather invest in rockets that can fly to the next country than to the next planet. i remember reading in 2000 about possibilities to going to mars within the decade. plans changed since then, although sometimes they look similar: Quote
⌐■_■ Posted February 20, 2011 Report Posted February 20, 2011 looks like it's about damn time we create an alien enemy then. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.