Sentura Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 I was surprised to hear they did not want to work on MW2. If a lot these allegations are true, pretty shitty of Activision. It just sounds to me like IW is actually populated by intelligent people. ethics != intelligence Quote
Rick_D Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 http://kotaku.com/5493218/modern-warfar ... lous-price IW employees trying to get paid! Quote
Jetsetlemming Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 $15 for five maps doesn't seem all that crazy ridiculous to me, unless they're bad maps or something. It's not like there's some alternate source of maps for Modern Warfare 2 after all Quote
Ginger Lord Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 Doesn't seem overpriced to me either, £2/$3 a map is a bargain compared to the Burnout Paradise DLC. Not that I have MW2 anyway Quote
Mazy Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 I don't think the price is that bad if you're still really into the game. I've fallen off the MW2 train, it's all about BC2 for me now. However if you're still totally into MW2 then it's probably a price worth paying, even if two of them are repackaged COD4 maps The one taking place in an apartment complex, which there was a loading screen picture released/leaked of, looked pretty cool. Still slightly irritated with the way things went after I got the COD4 DLC tho, really wanted to try out the maps and every time it was about to change to a DLC map everybody vetoed it. As a result I maybe played the COD4 maps 3 times each, since apparently no one else wanted to try out the stuff they paid extra for. Sigh. Quote
Izuno Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 So the two fired execs signed with a talent agency... http://www.industrygamers.com/news/mode ... ts-agency/ Discuss. I think it is only a matter of time before current IW staff gets poached given how it is basically impossible to enforce non-compete clauses in California based on residents' right to work. It is a question of when, not if. I just hope we get new good games out of whatever they do next. Quote
dux Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 Just for irony's sake, I'd love to see them get signed by EA. As, I may be wrong here, wasn't the reason IW got started was to get away from the MOH train that EA was doing, much like activision is now doing with COD? Quote
Furyo Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 I certainly hope (and would be very very surprised if they don't) they form a brand new studio, that will remain independent through and through and sign with the likes to EAP for distribution. Even if they can't get most of IW to relocate to this new gig (which I like to think they could) the moment the word gets out they'll have thousands of applicants to pick through. They have the money, they have the talent pool and they sure as hell can get a new engine. Tri facta, completed. Quote
KungFuSquirrel Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 Just for irony's sake, I'd love to see them get signed by EA. As, I may be wrong here, wasn't the reason IW got started was to get away from the MOH train that EA was doing, much like activision is now doing with COD? I think Furyo's absolutely right about EAP - it's really the way to go if you've got your own funding. And a very different beast than EA, though new-look EA remains a marked improvement over old EA even if the old stigma still stands. Quote
Sentura Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 Just for irony's sake, I'd love to see them get signed by EA. As, I may be wrong here, wasn't the reason IW got started was to get away from the MOH train that EA was doing, much like activision is now doing with COD? I think Furyo's absolutely right about EAP - it's really the way to go if you've got your own funding. And a very different beast than EA, though new-look EA remains a marked improvement over old EA even if the old stigma still stands. i agree, EA since around 2006-2007 has improved substantially. Quote
Zacker Posted March 15, 2010 Report Posted March 15, 2010 the cluster fuck continues: http://kotaku.com/5491675/rumor-why-cal ... ing-around apperently the other emplyoees are sticking around despite meager pay becasue activision hasnt paid out the promised royalties to them either ! and they probably wont for a while in order to keep the emplyoees from mass deflecting ... i hate these kind of buisness methods *anger* Forcing employees to stay with those kind of methods is the same as forcing employees to sneak in midget porn everywhere in your products. As in, that is what I hope the employees do if this is the case. Quote
Skjalg Posted March 16, 2010 Report Posted March 16, 2010 didnt valve employees do that? Sneak in midgets? Quote
Sentura Posted March 16, 2010 Report Posted March 16, 2010 i'd hardly call it sneaking since they had achievements with certain gnomes... Quote
Bluestrike Posted March 16, 2010 Report Posted March 16, 2010 $15 for five maps doesn't seem all that crazy ridiculous to me, unless they're bad maps or something. It's not like there's some alternate source of maps for Modern Warfare 2 after all If there was an alternate source for maps they could not charge the $15 and get away with it. As predicted there is no mapeditor so they can charge dlc. Seems Ruse is going the same way, Ubi claiming that creating such large maps is not something outside the average user's skill. So I bet there is going to be paid dlc. Its all about money these days Quote
st0lve Posted March 17, 2010 Report Posted March 17, 2010 Actually, that's $15 for 3 new maps, and 2 old ones. Come on :ssj: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.