lol Microsoft

[dux]

Microsoft top brass have decided to axe plans to open a bar on their Redmond campus.

The bar - named Spitfire - was almost completed when Microsoft abruptly pulled the plug, and when I say almost completed, I mean they had deals with food and drink distributors, hung signs announcing the opening and hired 22 staff. Spitfire was due to open tomorrow.

Microsoft spokesman Lou Gellos had this to say, "The goal was always to create a cool gathering place for employees, but to do so in a manner that's consistent with a business environment. We took a second look at that, and we were sensitive to the business environment. We decided we should do something more appropriate, and that meant not having a pub."

Perhaps I'm biased, after all, I come from the UK, a nation of drinkers, but this seems like a bit of an own goal for Microsoft. I can't imagine that many employees were going to be stumbling into their cubicles blind drunk.

Bar owner Jonathan Sposato was equally baffled: "I am completely stunned and disappointed by the decision," he said, "I am confused by the sudden change of heart." Sposato declined to comment on how much he and his partner had invested in the project, only saying that it was 'a lot'.

He hopes that it won't have to come to litigation, pointing out that the site could easily be turned into an alcohol free restaurant.

and:

A federal judge has ordered Microsoft to pay $380 million for infringing on a patent from Uniloc.

Uniloc, in California, makes software that prevents you from installing the same program on multiple machines. The suit claims that Microsoft XP and Office do a bit too much of the same thing, thereby infringing on Uniloc's patent.

The suit began six years ago but this week the court finally ruled in Uniloc's favor. Unsurprisingly, Microsoft is looking to appeal against the judgment.

"We are very disappointed in the jury verdict. We believe that we do not infringe, that the patent is invalid and that this award of damages is legally and factually unsupported," said Microsoft spokesman David Bowermaster.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/vi ... es-The-Bar

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/vi ... on-Lawsuit

[Jetsetlemming]

Really weird on the MS bar thing. I can't help but wonder what higher-up somehow completely didn't notice construction, staff, paying for, and managing a full bar on-site until the day before it was supposed to open, then was so offended by the concept that they killed it completely, refusing to even turn it into an alcohol free restaurant.

[Thrik]

That's just idiotic. That kind of thing is good for company morale.

[Sentura]

i agree on the notion that the first one is pretty idiotic, but the second one i think is a fault of US patents. so now you can apparently patent certain code, and if someone accidentally writes some code the same way, you can sue them? so technically because i made a method/function that gives me access to x, i can patent it and sue everyone else using anything remotely similar? bullshit.

[Jetsetlemming]

US patent law has a lot of bullshit. The patent office seems to just accept everything and let the courts and lawyers figure out what's actually right or not. Lots of patenting really vague generic shit, lots of constant grandfathering of copyright lengths (fuck you Disney), etc.

http://w2.eff.org/patent/

[D3ads]

That's just idiotic. That kind of thing is good for company morale.

Agreed 100%, they're going to have a lot of unhappy employees now...

[Sentura]

That's just idiotic. That kind of thing is good for company morale.

Agreed 100%, they're going to have a lot of unhappy employees now...

as opposed to the tons of happy employees microsoft is known for?

[Skjalg]

That's just idiotic. That kind of thing is good for company morale.

Agreed 100%, they're going to have a lot of unhappy employees now...

as opposed to the tons of happy employees microsoft is known for?

Isn't it the other way around?

[Sentura]

well i was being sarcastic

[Skjalg]

I know.

Which is why I ment "Isn't microsoft known for having satisfied workers?".