Buying Adobe CS4

[e-freak]

I don't know if it's the right subforum but it's kinda industry related and not so much offtopic.

This year university started for me and I'm looking into getting a student Version of the new Adobe CS4 products. I am looking into the Production Premium Suite but there are two things I need to check:

InDesign is not included and I'd appreciate to use it but the only way to get it is paying 200€ extra - can anyone name a good alternative?

Dreamweaver is not included and I'm not sure if it's essential or not for web-development. Flash Pro is included and I think it covers up all the tasks but in how far is Dreamweaver special?

How important is Version Cue and is it of any use? The Premium Production is the only Suite not including it and I think it could be usefull but I've never worked with it before.

Additional: Lightroom 2 seems to be a blast but costs another 100€ extra - anyone knows how much Photoshop and Bridge can compensate the missing features (I really liked the DB functions in Lightroom and the feature to cook one picture and copy the settings to any other picture in the DB plus all changes are always saved as recepts and not baked into the picture)

[hessi]

regarding indesign: i was once all about indesign for making my notes as exam preparation, but then i gave LaTeX a closer look and for what i can say: it's like all the way to go. you can get it for free and there is tons of addons and literature on the web. once you get a hang of it you can make professional looking documents in no time. save the money for indesign on something better!

[Minos]

There's no way you can survive without Dreamweaver If you are going to work with websites, it's worthy every penny

As for an alternative for InDesign you can get Quark Xpress, but I have no idea on how costly it is and I wouldn't recommend any of them unless you are going to work with magazines, newspapers etc.. because they are very specific and costly software.

[e-freak]

Ok, LaTeX is nice, I knew that tool for quite a while but never figured it as an alternative but well that seems to fit, thanks for the tip.

Quark Xpress seams to be costly as well and I'm not working fullstop on magazines and I think I don't need it then (and the Uni-Computers still hold InDesign if I work on one of these machines)

but may I ask: What's the special thing about dreamweaver? And my work-profile will be most likely to create flash-games and flash-apps in the beginning and web-design most probably only as a side-effect. Is Dreamweaver more of a technical or a design software? (lots of questions )

[Minos]

The good thing is that it's both a technical and design software. Writing HTML/CSS without it is extremely painful and slow. Trust me, even if you are only doing simple pages you are totally going to need DW and HTML as flash sites really suck.

Sure you can look for free alternatives but DW is definitely the top software when it comes to designing sites.

[Ginger Lord]

Dreamweavers like Microsoft Frontpage.

Except not shitty, conforms to web standards and is about a billion times better all round.

[Thrik]

InDesign is primarily used for magazine/brochure production. Indeed, it's one of the industry standards in this respect, much like Photoshop is the industry standard for web design and texturing. Its direct and only real competitor is Quark. I'd say it has absolutely no relevance to web design at all.

If you're planning on going into web design, you'll really need to be able to write the HTML and CSS yourself. This is pretty much an industry standard skill now, and in fact employers will often want to see proficiency in Javascript and the ability to work around languages such as ASP.NET and PHP too. The convenience of Dreamweaver is nice, but for complex design it's not really very good (browser bugs will get ya).

The best way to learn to write HTML and CSS is to force yourself to use a text editor (even if it's a fancy one) and avoid the visual editors like Dreamweaver, which sacrifice control for ease of use — kind of like using an automatic seamless texture generator instead of editing it yourself. It's actually not very hard, but it can seem daunting at first. I've essentially taught someone to write good XHTML and CSS in a matter of weeks so it's not going to take years.

It's not clear what exactly you're doing at university, but as someone who's been a full-time web designer for two years I can say you don't really need much beyond Photoshop and Flash to do the job well. Dreamweaver is an excellent visual HTML editor, but practically all professional web companies have their (X)HTML written by hand nowadays. I do use Dreamweaver, but I only use the 'Code' part of it.

[e-freak]

Yes, I learned HTML and CSS when I was 13 and I'm pretty sure I don't lack in that field (hopefully ). Webdesing is just a border thing of the study-path, main focus is on games and animations.

The thing "Dreamweaver is like Frontpage" is ok for me - I don't need to spend the 100€ on that one then. And I'm pretty sure now I can do the print-layouts I may need in LaTex or at university's computers if needed. As said: Print and Web are only small things we seem to cover up, mostly to help presenting our projects and not as full courses.

Thanks everyone for the replies.

Anyone having a clue about the Lightroom-thingie aswell? I really like it but it's another 120€ on the 320€ I have to pay for the Production Suite. Maybe some one has used it already professional or can tell in how far it's relevant (I like it but does it justify the extra cost?)

[aevirex]

regarding indesign: i was once all about indesign for making my notes as exam preparation, but then i gave LaTeX a closer look and for what i can say: it's like all the way to go. you can get it for free and there is tons of addons and literature on the web. once you get a hang of it you can make professional looking documents in no time. save the money for indesign on something better!

I wish there was a voting function on Mapcore, because for mentioning LaTeX you deserve being upvoted! LaTeX simply does it right and if you happen to be a typography fetishist (like I am), there is imo nothing that comes close. :]

[Thrik]

Lightroom is definitely geared towards photographers, and works best when you have lots of photos to process. If you have anything less than 'many', Photoshop is probably preferable. You don't really need the beginning-to-end flow that Lightroom offers.

[Buddy]

Lightroom is definitely geared towards photographers, and works best when you have lots of photos to process. If you have anything less than 'many', Photoshop is probably preferable. You don't really need the beginning-to-end flow that Lightroom offers.

I would personally pick DxO rather than Lightroom.

[e-freak]

yay that's the thing - I'm handling about 13000 fotos a year and I think that's quite alot

[Thrik]

I'd go with Lightroom or an equivalent, then. That is a lot of photos!

I handle a reasonable amount, and it does get a little tiresome using Photoshop sometimes. It clearly just isn't designed for going through loads of images and tweaking their colour levels and whatnot, whereas Lightroom is directly designed for this. It can be made easier with Photoshop actions and bulk saves, but it's not the same.

I did use Lightroom briefly and was impressed by what I saw, anyway. It's easier to kind of 'get into' processing a fuckload of photos, if that makes sense.

Don't forget Adobe typically has 30-day trials for everything, so there's no reason to take anything from information alone. Give them a go!

[Hourences]

I had a more or less related question, would anyone advice against buying second hand PS ? Saves quite a bit of money, but there is a catch perhaps? How does that work with the license.

[Chunks]

I'm pretty sure that violates the licensing agreement. You may as well be pirating.

To give you an idea... At work we got audited by Autodesk and they threatened to fine us just because we were still using old version of their software. Evidentally, per the contract when we bought some new licenses we were supposed to have gotten rid of the older versions.

Commercial licenses are pretty strict, you can't resell them.