Jump to content

Mitch Mitchell

Members
  • Content Count

    172
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mitch Mitchell

  • Rank
    Regular

Profile Information

  • Real Name
    Mitch Mitchell

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Does it have a one-click 'align all vertexes to grid' option/command? (haven't used it yet, just wondering)
  2. Ah Crysis, the most overpriced bench-marking tool ever released
  3. I think this is how I feel about this game:
  4. On the controller? Never bothered me - but you can turn the brightness down in the settings.
  5. Oh, totally. MS do have a compression/decompression, but the details are as you say; scarce. I'll say it again, this round will be a mirror'd example of the XB360/PS3 32-bit war we saw in the 90's/00's - which was (I think) the longest console war ever...2005-2017 (commenced/discontinued date for both consoles) and, I think the PS5/XBSX consoles appear to very much be consoles that are glorified upgrades over the PS4/XB1 models.
  6. Perhaps it will, perhaps it won't - but decompressing on-the-fly is dependent on the type/sort/variety of your compression type, for which XB does not appear to have of the same quality, comparatively speaking. So - that is the bottleneck I spoke of. http://www.radgametools.com/oodlekraken.htm
  7. True, And what devs need are platforms that: 1) Allow for backwards compatibility to existing stock. 2) Allow for full and complete usage of the hardware with no bottlenecks. 3) Allow for the least amount of restrictions on design...so, not having to worry about packaging up levels/maps would be a key part of that (for PS5) versus the XBSX using 'off the shelf' hardware, like they drove through the tech warehouse and just filled up the cart with stuff and slammed it together. the way XBSX has an exhaust at the top...not the greatest way to extract heat out of a box, and, is probably the worst thing people would want under/next to, their tv... PS5 has a better toolbox for devs than XBSX, I suspect.
  8. Which part? The "I think MS has the lead" or "but will lose by a gnats hair" ? If the former, it is down to the perception as MS is quoting TFLOP numbers in their marketing and are pushing these numbers as a key barometer of performance. If the latter, that is because of the developer-centrist design of the PS5. XBSX will no doubt be pushed by numbers and it is akin to a Lamborghini Countach in how it was marketed. Big, impressive design. Big numbers. Yet, hard to get in and out of, brake discs like milk-bottle tops, and over-heated so badly you could not get the windows open fast enough, which was hard, given the fact the windows didn't work properly anyway. But hey, it looked cool, right? If XBSX is the Countach, PS5 will be the Countach with air-con, ABS, better fuel efficiency and sat-nav
  9. Mind=Blown I need to take along walk in the country to get over this. Sadly, that's not possible right now...maybe I'll go play with my lego and build de_Dust2
  10. XBSX Pro: Hardware Con: Cost of ownership What we want: Absolutely no dedication of system resources being applied to anything other than games, whilst playing games; movies whilst playing movies; tv whilst watching tv and more importantly, for the second time: games whilst playing games. PS5 Pro: Hardware and developer-centric Con: UI/GUI/UX (historically) What we want: A new PlayStation. I know, it sounds kinda crazy, but it really is at the center of our desire: a new PlayStation. Not a new games console, but a new PlayStation. There has always been something very 'Japanese' about the PlayStation, almost as if the designers came down from Mount Fuji with a smile on their face and joy in their hearts, eager and willing to bring that joy to others with ingenuous reverence and indifference to what others were doing at the time. PlayStation was different, unique and very very very clever. PlayStation is not another games console, it is a PlayStation. Emphasis on PLAY. On a technical level, I think Sony has won this round. On a perceptual level, I think MS has the lead, but will lose by a gnats hair as this round will be very very very similar to the XB360/PS3 round, wherein the difference wasn't very high (1 million units to PS3?). As an aside to this, and from a developer standpoint: how due we feel about Real-Time, now that lightmaps are no longer going to be a requirement? And games install sizes are going to be significantly reduced for the same reason? We will need the basic texture for sure, but no more lightmaps? That's quite a reduction pre-runtime and runtime. Very interested in this, and, coming back to the comparisons between MS and Sony; as Sony has a gargantuan lead over MS for decompressing textures in real-time, what is MS going to do when developers cannot use MS for game worlds that require rapid speed of loading? Is it going to be like GTA3 all over again, when you have to wait for the games console to load the adjacent segment of the map, poised at the ready, unable to take your eyes off the screen because when it (finally) loads, you are traveling at100 miles per hour and might hit a truck and die? The thing about developers is that they cannot go back. You give developers tools and they will use them with reverence, and, they will have to have uncomfortable conversations with the higher-ups along the lines of 'we cannot make the XBSX load the map that fast...you need to make the map smaller, or introduce a game mechanic to stop players moving so fast'. XBSX will break games that require fast loading, AFAICT.
  11. So, we don't know? Someone call Dave, and get him to confirm one way or another as to the original locality of de_dust2, because this is not gonna go away anytime soon. I know "3kliksphilip" is on here sometimes, he might have a hotline to contact DJ on this... This, is getting to be an interesting point of contention about one of the most famous maps ever made - <3 all
  12. This is a Valve response (Jess Cliffe, co-creator of Counter-Strike) to the question as to whether the game/level/map was originally based in Morocco, and that bringing the new revamped version of de_Dust2 was attempting to return to that location as best it could. Unless DJ himself wishes to get on a train from Suffolk to my yard and tell me otherwise, I'm going with this as the basis for my answer. As always, I humbly stand to be corrected - and again, I do apologize for my earlier misunderstanding.
  13. I've looked into this at length now, and cannot find anything to support the idea that De_Dust2 is located in the middle-east, but on the other side of Africa.
  14. We might be talking cross-purposes here, but I've re-read your original comments and I think I have confused what you wrote with something else somehow. Apps for the misunderstanding. The original map of de_Dust2 going back to the very first iteration is based on Morocco.
  15. I think you'll find the original basis for the map was Morocco, which although is close to the middle-east, it's north-west African coastal area.
×
×
  • Create New...